ULTRA 55 Review - Michael Fremer of Stereophile Magazine

Damon Von Schweikert

WBF Technical Expert
Sep 15, 2016
118
264
195
California
www.vonschweikert.com
"Overall, the Von Schweikert ULTRA 55 measurements indicate excellent audio engineering." - John Atkinson

"Whatever the measurements might say - I won't see them until after the review - I found the ULTRA 55 to be among the more timbrally neutral and pleasing speakers I've reviewed, from the very first listen. They served every musical genre well and are highly competitive in the $100,000/pair price region. If you're shopping in that price range, I recommend an audition." - Michael Fremer

"When I sat in the off-center seat in my room, the ULTRA 55's imaged very well; indeed, they produced the least spatial and timbral shift I've encountered from a loudspeaker in my room. This wasn't surprising because it's what I've experienced at shows and it's what Von Schweikert claims its speakers do especially well. This is NOT advertising hype: I can't recall another speaker I've reviewed or owned that was so well behaved off-axis. These speakers do NOT beam or produce sharp off-axis edges or abrupt timbral shifts." - Michael Fremer

For the full review with much greater insight into this design, we encourage you to read the current issue of Stereophile Magazine. That's Volume 43, Number 7. Enjoy!

Stereophile Vol 43, NO 7.jpg
 
Damon and Leif, congrats on the review. I was wondering about the HF rolloff shown in Atkinson’s measurements. Is what we’re seeing consistent with the design goal, or is it an artifact of the way he does the sort of averaged spaced measurement?
 
Congratulations Damon and Leif!
 
I was wondering about the HF rolloff shown in Atkinson’s measurements...

In my experience a rear-firing tweeter has worthwhile perceptual benefits which are not obvious from the measurements, but its contribution can end up being a bit "too much" if the main tweeter's isn't "voiced" with the rear-firing tweeter in mind.

And Von Schweikert Audio has long been expert in the use of rear-firing tweeters.

Albert's speakers impressed the heck out of me the first time I heard them, almost two decades ago. As a planar guy, I was hearing them do something which sounded (or maybe "felt") right to me, something which was absent from all the other rooms with "conventional" speakers. When I looked at the back of his speaker, what I had been hearing suddenly made more sense.
 
Last edited:
Fantastic news for VS and look forward to reading the review.
 
In my experience a rear-firing tweeter has worthwhile perceptual benefits which are not obvious from the measurements, but its contribution can end up being a bit "too much" if the main tweeter's isn't "voiced" with the rear-firing tweeter in mind.

And Von Schweikert Audio has long been expert in the use of rear-firing tweeters.

Albert's speakers impressed the heck out of me the first time I heard them, almost two decades ago. As a planar guy, I was hearing them do something which sounded (or maybe "felt") right to me, something which was absent from all the other rooms with "conventional" speakers. When I looked at the back of his speaker, what I had been hearing suddenly made more sense.

I think you’re right on the money, Duke, and frankly I suspected it has something to do with the way JA does his spaced measurement. I have never at a show heard any VSA speaker show a lack of properly balanced treble energy with respect to the rest of the frequency range. As a matter of fact, the VSA’s are among a very very few brands of speakers where there’s (to me, anyway) a proper frequency balance pretty much no matter where you sit - near the speaker, further away, dead center, off axis). It’s about as beautifully seamless as I’ve heard. Enough so among other things to where I now live happily with the E SE as my main speaker pair. There’s nothing missing in my listening space. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: PierreB and Leif S
Damon and Leif, congrats on the review. I was wondering about the HF rolloff shown in Atkinson’s measurements. Is what we’re seeing consistent with the design goal, or is it an artifact of the way he does the sort of averaged spaced measurement?
Hi Tony,

I will talk about this shortly. I haven't had time to do this yet but I will. And I will be posting other measurements. The short answer is when you take a bunch of measurements from on axis to extreme off axis and average them, the tweeter response should look like that. But I will go more in depth about this.

All the best
 
Thank you, Leif. :D
 
The extreme
Hi Tony,

I will talk about this shortly. I haven't had time to do this yet but I will. And I will be posting other measurements. The short answer is when you take a bunch of measurements from on axis to extreme off axis and average them, the tweeter response should look like that. But I will go more in depth about this.

All the best


Isn't the extreme off axis important , i was told the avg of direct on axis vs off is a better indicator as to how the loudspeakers will sound in room ..
 
Cool. How times and prices have changed - I remember when I bought my 4.5's and they were like 6K :) Still had AIR and the GAIN circuit, similar size drivers, same bass extension, bigger cabinets but certainly not the quality of finish.

The 55's must sound unbelievable.
 
the measurements are +/-10 db. I do notice the larger the bass peak around 100 hz the more reviewers tend to like them, if i'm interpreting corr
620VS55fig5.jpg
ectly? There's those that would look at the room response and scratch these off the list.
 
the measurements are +/-10 db. I do notice the larger the bass peak around 100 hz the more reviewers tend to like them, if i'm interpreting corr
620VS55fig5.jpg
ectly? There's those that would look at the room response and scratch these off the list.
John has always measured speakers this way. We were thrilled to have our very first speaker ever measured by John. As well as a review by Michael Fremer.
Unfortunately this is an averaged response. This is a measurement that is not important to me. If you read in the review, Michael states he has never reviewed or owned a pair of speakers that behaved so well off axis. He also states this about every room he has covered of ours at the audio shows. The speakers completely disappear. Every seat in the house is a great seat. This wouldn't be possible if you were lacking treble energy. Every VSA owner knows this about our speakers. That you can get up and walk around the room and there is little to no change in the tonality. You can stand directly in between the speakers and it sounds damn near as if your sitting out in the middle of the room. If you look at the Magico M2 review you will see how the M2's tweeter response is very similar. Now my measurements of the tweeter off axis don't show this extreme of a roll off. This is why this measurement means absolutely nothing to do with the performance of this speaker or how the ear/brain mechanism processes. Michael's room does have a nasty bump in the bass frequency but not as audibly noticeable as the graph shows. I would have some tube traps in the corners if the ULTRA 55's were the speakers to stay in that room. But his Alexx speakers when set up are in those corners. The measurement I'm posting is the ULTRA 55's 10 feet apart with the microphone in the listening position equal lateral to the speakers with no room boundaries(free air) in our factory. This is the measurement I care about. Not an averaged response as shown.
Damon and I will be talking about certain things covered in this review and why they are important to us.
20200131_134252.jpg
And this is without the rear ribbon in play since I have no back wall for the ribbon to play off of.
 
Usually the speakers I prefer end up with measured rolled off treble. My point was more about how deceiving measurements can be when shopping from home
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leif S
As a 14-year Von Schweikert owner, I can unequivocally say that this debate about on axis/off axis measurements is NOT really important. As with power amplifiers, the measurements are nice to know but at the end of the day when I'm listening to music, the graphs and internet debates mean very little.

Anyone who has had the chance to listen to VSA products knows that when listening on or off axis (which I do frequently) there is no change in energy, timber or frequency shifts. The music remains seamless at all listening levels. This VSA characteristic is present throughout the entire product range from the Unifield 2 to the Ultra 11. I have listen to them all.
 
Last edited:
The old saying is that the XO is the heart of the loudspeaker. With VSA this is certainly the truth. They were doing cascades while everybody else was staying rigidly with 1st order because that was what the customers wanted of believed to be best. As everyone now knows, wide coverage is not 1st order's strongest suit while they are perfectly fine for a solo listener.

I entertain in my room a lot, at least before this $&^%$ pandemic, so even coverage is huge for me. When people come for auditions, I typically sit at the left wing seat beside the equipment racks right in the line of fire of the left loudspeaker. I can't tell you what a godsend it is not to be assaulted from that angle for what sometimes is 3 or 4 hours.

Here's a vid shot with what must have been an early iphone of the now 3 generations old VSA speaker taken from the rickety wing chair. Mikey is spot on, it isn't marketing hype. Someone can actually stand between you and one of the speakers and the stage doesn't collapse. I've only experienced this to this extent with VSA and Genesis.

 
Someone can actually stand between you and one of the speakers and the stage doesn't collapse. I've only experienced this to this extent with VSA and Genesis.

Very interesting observation. I can't help but notice that VSA and Genesis have this in common: Both use rear-firing drivers very intelligently.

(To my ears the Von Schweikerts tend to have the more neutral voicing of the two, but my sample sizes are not very large.)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: JackD201

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu