Wadax Reference Dac and Server arrive
- Thread starter Mike Lavigne
- Start date
You're not the only one. I am pairing an SS DAC with tube amplification as well. And no, to Mike's point, the quite linear Octave amplification, extended at both frequency extremes, doesn't "cover up" a digital signature. It's actually pretty brutal in being unkind to flaws, which is good, because it forces you to solve problems, rather than masking them.
I have taken care of artifacts that might have been attributed to digital, also in the past by myself, but weren't digital ones after all. These were mainly acoustic issues of and within my room, and power issues.
Having said that, reclocking of the signal between CD transport and DAC was essential as well.
Last edited:
About the music apps, knowing the internals of how these stuffs actually works there should be no SQ difference as long as all things are kept equal. There is no actual “better.”
Music apps should only has one job: controlling what files go to the player. If the file is bit perfect, it means they have not changed the file. If one changes things about the music in Roon, Taiko TAS/XDMS, Lumin app, Aurender app or dCS Mosaic... then the file is no longer bit-perfect. It is different.
I hope the music apps always acquits themself of their task in the future. There is no real difference in absolute performance and it only comes down to the preference of the listener.
So after all, the SQ should depends on the quality of the original recordings and the quality of music server/streamer.
It’s all a matter of preference so as long as you’re enjoying the whole experience and listening more then you’re on the right track.
I
I have been pairing a solid state dac (Tidal Camira lately but before that inter alia DCS) with tube amplification (Kondo preamp and poweramps) for many years. And I will keep doing this with adding the Wadax Reference dac. Bought the latter about three weeks ago and I hope to receive it at the end of this month.
I don't begin to agree with that Steve. There is a difference between TAS and Roon with my Extreme, less after the latest Roon change but still evident. Maybe something to do with how busy the software is?
Yes, I know there is the difference between TAS/XDMS and Roon on the Taiko Extreme. Like I said, I hope the music apps can acquit themself of their main task in the future and do not change anything about music in them. If these stuffs actually work, there should be no SQ difference as long as all things are kept equal. There is no actual “better.” Andrew of dCS also said this.
Hi Micro
My system has gone through a few iterations starting with Single ended Triodes for more than a decade, and arriving at the latest iteration as follows:
Streamer for Youtube and TV: Rose RS 150
DAC: Wadax Reference
Amp: Naim Statement
Speakers: Magico M-Pro
I listen to jazz, acoustic unplugged pop albums and classical music most of the time.
I use mainly solo Pianos for auditioning gears
For large full range speakers, I use vocal recordings, for small 2 way speaker systems, I use large scale orchestral works
Thanks
This is just not true. Music software does so much more than just send bits to the DAC. For example, Roon is constantly creating network traffic doing various tasks. This could all be happening while the music is playing, which causes the processor to be multi-tasking. In addition, all the music players may be checking the music sources (NAS, hard drive, streaming) to check for updates. Some also load music into RAM waiting to be played. When does this happen? There is so much going on in addition to sending data to the DAC.
Victor is member V-Squared; he was with Elliot and i the first night with the Wadax. his system is listed in his Signature here. he lives in Northern Calif but is considering moving to the Seattle, so is doing an extended stay here right now.
Wadax Reference Dac and Server arrive
great listening day yesterday from noon on. back and forth between the Wadax chain and MSB/Extreme chain once in the afternoon, plus i did play 2 Lp's for that reference. we were joined by a WBF member (MSB Ref dac owner) for dinner and then listening till 11pm, and did 4 switches between the...
www.whatsbestforum.com
he also put together this M9-MSB system for his friend, as well as has assisted Alon Wolf with the A/C power grid design for the main M9 Magico listening room.
Magico M9
Magico M9 installation with MSB electronics Wow, absolutely beautiful!
www.whatsbestforum.com
Seems like we are about to have another Roon explosion. I believe a lot of us know that some/most people on WBF who own Taiko units prefer Taiko music management SW. Nothing wrong with that.
In this post @Mike Lavigne has decided to go with a Wadax Server using Roon. This doesn't mean Taiko with TAS isn't a great unit, it just means he chose something different.
All I can say is congrats on the Wadax Reference DAC and Server. I know if I had that combo all I would be doing is listening to music!
In this post @Mike Lavigne has decided to go with a Wadax Server using Roon. This doesn't mean Taiko with TAS isn't a great unit, it just means he chose something different.
All I can say is congrats on the Wadax Reference DAC and Server. I know if I had that combo all I would be doing is listening to music!
jonyung, are you using a server for Roon Core? If so which one (if not Wadax)? Thanks.
Ohh, if everything is like you said, why there isn't the difference between Mosaic and Roon about SQ? I don't know how TAS/XDMS is but I believe Andrew because he is the representation of dCS to answer this problem on the dCS forum.
Hi Cyrus
Havn't gone that far yet, I'm using Rose at the moment, no Roon. But will get the matching Streamer in due course. Its just gonna take some time.
Having said that, I'm pretty OK with the sonics so far, amazing.
In reading the dCS forums there are a lot of people who think Roon and Mosaic sound different. I don't own any dCS equipment so I can't comment from my own experience. What I do know is that I have listened to Roon, TAS and Euphony and they all sound different. In addition, Roon has made changes over time which has affected the sound. I can assure you that I am not the only one who thinks each software player sounds different (and I am not saying better or worse, just different).
On the dCS forum, there are also many people who think Roon and Mosaic sound the same. Andrew had the statistics and he told clearly that: "If these stuffs actually work, there should be no SQ difference as long as all things are kept equal. There is no actual “better.”"
And yes, I agree that there are other software players sound different and I don't know they have changed something about music in them or not.
Last edited:
Hi Mike,
I own the MSB Select DAC and my Vandersteen M7-HPA monoblocks have tubes in the input stage and the first gain stage. My MSB M204 monoblocks have a lower noise floor but my Vandersteen monoblocks couldn’t sound more organic. Consequently, the MSB M204 monoblocks remain in the bullpen.
Best,
Ken
Yes, and I have seen people complaining a few years ago that back then a Roon software update made the music sound softer, on otherwise the very same playback.
The myth "bits is bits" just doesn't hold with streaming. There are so many complicating, and apparently not easily knowable, factors about streaming and computer audio in general, it is ridiculous.
I have heard so many problems with computer audio over the years, and also direct comparisons with CD transport (including with reclocker which is even better) that it now seems obvious to me that few people , using streaming, actually get out of their digital what it is inherently capable of.
Many complaints about digital audio sound to me like complaints about the streaming itself, rather than digital per se.
Until computer audio becomes mature, I'll stick with CD transport, followed by reclocker, and do streaming over headphones on Youtube where sound quality just doesn't matter that much to me.
Sure, a SOTA assault on streaming like the Wadax server may get all out of it, but in the real world with real world prices there are just so many pitfalls in computer audio. Not that it can't be done right, but boy, how easily can it be derailed.
"Bits is bits". Sounds suspiciously like Perfect Sound Forever. I thought we had gotten over that one.
While I can never go back to a CD transport, I agree with your other comments.
I am not the one you need to convince on this one!
Frankly, this is one of the main reasons why I am committed to Taiko Audio. They agree with your assessment of the complications associated with computer audio.
I'm not sure how much comparing of digital Mike did with stored files. Would be interesting to know how they differ.
I am starting to understand a large part of what may make the Wadax perform the way it does is algorithm error correction software. Not so much the hardware. Not that harware is not critical . It is. But software matters.
And this is not OS software. Its filter software. Like what you do in HQ Player. But the wadax has their own filter and way they have applied it. I am told this software is very important with streaming. It may not be as important with harware that bypasses the kernel. As in a CD transport such as the Jays Audio transport.
I am told if I want to get the most out of a DAC, give it the most direct data stream that bypasses the kernel. That means I have to burn files to a CD, then use the transport as a playback device.
I did sit my 3 sources the other day. The tape definitely acts more like Mikes system. The vinyl too. Accept I can now more hear the deficiencies in my cartridge and phono pre. Then there is digital. Streaming really sucks. It just does for certain types of music. If you want suspended disbelief in piano or strings, its not happening with streaming. But move to files on the hard drive and we are a step closer. I heard it moving the right way. I may spring for a Jays transport one day. I would just prefer to find an SD player that operates the same way as a transport. For now I have to accept how digital functions and understand its limitations.
Others who don't want to go wadax may want to start trying other input sources to their DAC. Get away from the USB/server relationship. Yes, I understand that is a hard stop for most as streaming is a door to so much music. But until good filter/ereor correction software becomes more ubiquitous in affordable brands, streaming is going to be hindered. Good, even great harware, PS, vibration isolation, shielding, filtering etc only go so far. It's only 1 way to deal with digital noise. It is critical. But it seems software is needed to fix some of the damage inherent in how a server/DAC interface together.
I am starting to understand a large part of what may make the Wadax perform the way it does is algorithm error correction software. Not so much the hardware. Not that harware is not critical . It is. But software matters.
And this is not OS software. Its filter software. Like what you do in HQ Player. But the wadax has their own filter and way they have applied it. I am told this software is very important with streaming. It may not be as important with harware that bypasses the kernel. As in a CD transport such as the Jays Audio transport.
I am told if I want to get the most out of a DAC, give it the most direct data stream that bypasses the kernel. That means I have to burn files to a CD, then use the transport as a playback device.
I did sit my 3 sources the other day. The tape definitely acts more like Mikes system. The vinyl too. Accept I can now more hear the deficiencies in my cartridge and phono pre. Then there is digital. Streaming really sucks. It just does for certain types of music. If you want suspended disbelief in piano or strings, its not happening with streaming. But move to files on the hard drive and we are a step closer. I heard it moving the right way. I may spring for a Jays transport one day. I would just prefer to find an SD player that operates the same way as a transport. For now I have to accept how digital functions and understand its limitations.
Others who don't want to go wadax may want to start trying other input sources to their DAC. Get away from the USB/server relationship. Yes, I understand that is a hard stop for most as streaming is a door to so much music. But until good filter/ereor correction software becomes more ubiquitous in affordable brands, streaming is going to be hindered. Good, even great harware, PS, vibration isolation, shielding, filtering etc only go so far. It's only 1 way to deal with digital noise. It is critical. But it seems software is needed to fix some of the damage inherent in how a server/DAC interface together.
Similar threads
 | Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator |  | Ron Resnick Site Owner | Administrator |  | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |