Funny how everybody seems to nominate those who have done little (or nothing) to significantly advance the industry's actual performance levels.
Sure those nominated are most/all good-to-excellent designers. But you will not find a name among any of those mentioned in this thread (or any other thread) that has actually stood the industry on its ear from a real performance perspective in the past 40 - 50 years.
IMO, just more evidence that the "high-end" audio industry remains very much in its infancy stages from a performance perspective. And if that is true, is there really any other perspective worth our consideration?
Yep. Berning, Jussi Laako, Damien Plisson, Hiroyuki Yokota, the MBL people, Koch, John Swenson, Thorsten Loesch, the Spectral Audio people, Dietmar Brauer, the Merging people, Vincent Brient, Susumu Sakuma, Lukasz Ficus, Gregor @ Veracity Audio, the Aries Cerat people, Kimura, Kunusoki, Kondo, etc...
I guess you don't get out much or missed my post or never heard of Bob Carver...
One of the most remarkable engineers still active today: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_de_Paravicini
Good example of his design, almost a bargain in the High-end market: http://www.earyoshino.com/912/
I guess you don't get out much or missed my post or never heard of Bob Carver...
You're joking, right? You must be cuz I'm laughing at your statement.
I owned Bob Carver's "top of the line" pre-amp and amp (350 wpc at 900 wpc peaks - yeah right) for years thinking perhaps like you that they were the cat's meow. Only to discover in a direct comparison to an 80 wpc Onkyo receiver was significantly more musical, especially in the power category.
Carver may be a marketing genius but that's about it. Although I did get pleasure from his sonic holography technology.
Remember the old story about Carver making an amplifier out of a coffee can that sounded as good as a highly rated Conrad Johnson amp? Everybody thought he was a genius because of that little experiment.
Yet to this day, nobody including Carver understands what he really proved then. That Carver proved that a highly rated CJ amp sounded no better than an amp make from a coffee can.
Again, when I think of names worthy of mentioning in this industry, I only think from a performance perspective, not the bling bling or fancy remote, etc perspective. And in that category, you cannot think of a single name that has greatly impacted the industry from a sheer performance perspective.
You're joking, right? You must be cuz I'm laughing at your statement.
I owned Bob Carver's "top of the line" pre-amp and amp (350 wpc at 900 wpc peaks - yeah right) for years thinking perhaps like you that they were the cat's meow. Only to discover in a direct comparison to an 80 wpc Onkyo receiver was significantly more musical, especially in the power category.
Carver may be a marketing genius but that's about it. Although I did get pleasure from his sonic holography technology.
Remember the old story about Carver making an amplifier out of a coffee can that sounded as good as a highly rated Conrad Johnson amp? Everybody thought he was a genius because of that little experiment.
Yet to this day, nobody including Carver understands what he really proved then. That Carver proved that a highly rated CJ amp sounded no better than an amp make from a coffee can.
Again, when I think of names worthy of mentioning in this industry, I only think from a performance perspective, not the bling bling or fancy remote, etc perspective. And in that category, you cannot think of a single name that has greatly impacted the industry from a sheer performance perspective.
OK, your list is YOUR list, what you think is worthy is YOUR opinion. I deal in the world of common sense and facts. Look how many Carver products made these lists of the 10 most significant amps of all time along with WHY they are on the lists. Then look at the company he is in. Bob has amps from Phase linear, Carver, and Sunfire all on these lists.:
http://www.theabsolutesound.com/articles/the-ten-most-significant-amplifiers-of-all-time/
OK, your list is YOUR list
Have you given us your list yet?
No I've not given you my list yet. Not that it matters cuz nobody's heard of him but he's focused on performance only without any flair or bling.
Not because it's easier to make a blanket criticism grossly abasing all those previously mentioned without contributing anything yourself?
No I've not given you my list yet. Not that it matters cuz nobody's heard of him but he's focused on performance only without any flair or bling.
Abased or debased? I suppose it doesn't matter which.
I don't think the "grossly abasing" part can be attributed to me. Perhaps it can be attributed to you or others who've incorrectly given credence to those who've actually contributed little or nothing to real performance gains? You haven't witnessed me do that.
Then I have a conversation with your significant other and they clearly convince me you haven't an athletic bone in your body, was I in the wrong or your significant other?
My SO wouldn't even give you a second of attention... and if she did, she'd laugh out loudly to your face.