Probably the claim is enthusiastically hyperbolic, as most or our audiophile claims. But I have no problem saying that I still prefer the XLF to other Wilson Audio speakers, except the WAMM and probably the XVX, that I have not yet listened.
New Wilson speakers have surely improved medium, transparency, precision and bass definition. But overall none of them has the scale, bass depth and easiness of drive of the XLF, aspects that I valuate a lot.
Apparently it took ten years to Wilson to create the XVX, that betters the XLF. Charles S surely knows about it ...
Hi Microstrip, very good to make your acquaintance. I got my dealer upset with me for not buying an XLF. I came very close. I think it's a wonderful speaker, though I haven't heard it. It was Dave Wilson's last speaker, other than the WAMM and I know that he was extremely satisfied with its sound. DW also designed my Thor. Some don't know that he designed the Thor for mono, horizontal lie, music position. It was meant to be used with the XLF. The Thor was meant as a replacement for the XS, which was too heavy and impractical.
The XVX is slightly taller than the XLF and you would think that given my room, the XLF would be a better fit. However, the XVX has a narrower silhouette than the XLF and actually is a much better fit for my room. With subwoofer systems it is the blend that is most important to me. And i have achieved a perfect blend. There is no question that the XVX bass is slightly slower with my MC3500. It's Mcintosh tube bass. it's extremely pleasing to my ears. The Thor is slightly slower than a Subsonic but has considerably more output and because of its much higher sensitivity, may pick up extremely low-level subsonic notes better than a Subsonic. I don't know. Running my Thor tube/SS/SS with my MC2.1KW being the power amp, speeds the Thor up, so the slowed down XVX and the speeded-up Thor blend perfectly. I get a McIntosh tube bass down to 10Hz. In the 30-50 Hz range, the bass is different in quality, not in quantity. It's not until you get below 30 Hz that the Thor really dominates the XVX.
The XVX measures -3 dB at 16 hz at 110 dB. I suspect my Thor increases this to + 10-20 dB, so i could be + 15 dB at 16 Hz, I don't know. I never heard a 20Hz note I didn't like. I think you have a great speaker in the XLF. If it could have fit in my room easily, I'm sure I'd have bought one.
Charles
Charles Updated System: Wilson McIntosh Audioquest
Amps: McIntosh: MC3500MKII (2); MC1.25KW (2); MC2.1KW An
Preamp: C-12000 An
Sources: MCD12000 An; MVP881; MVP851; MR87; Marantz 510LV; Lenovo Yoga laptop
Speakers: Wilson Chronosonic XVX
Sub-Woofer: Wilson Thor’s Hammer; Wilson ActivXO Stereo Electronic Crossover
Cables Main System AQ: WEL Signature speaker cables; 24’ balanced IC; balanced 1-meter Dragon IC ; WEL Signature digital, Coffee digital coaxial cables; Diamond optical (2); Diamond USB; Dragon (5 HC, 3 source cords); Thunder & Monsoon power cords
Cables Subwoofer System AQ: Redwood speaker cable; Wolf balanced subwoofer IC; Wind balanced IC to ActivXO; Hurricane HC; Firebird HC; Firebird Source; Dragon HC, power cords
Power Conditioners: AQ Niagara 7000; Niagara 5000 (3); (4) dedicated 20-amp lines.
Isolation: Wilson Pedestals; Bassocontinuo McIntosh Ultra Feet; X-material plinth
Cabinet: Double Custom Woodwork & Design (CWD)
Acoustic Treatments: Room and Echo Tunes