Wow&Flutter Measurements Of Turntables And Ways To Improve

mtemur

Well-Known Member
Mar 26, 2019
2,049
2,048
370
49
Please share your wow&flutter measurements of the turntables and the measurement tool here. The most complicated standard is AES and Analog Magik measures in AES. Naturally it yields woorse performance figures compared to others especially instant measuring tools.
 
  • Like
Reactions: miniguy
Please share your wow&flutter measurements of the turntables and the measurement tool here. The most complicated standard is AES and Analog Magik measures in AES. Naturally it yields woorse performance figures compared to others especially instant measuring tools.

Did you calibrate your measurement system with standard calibration files?

Unless people do it the subject is complex enough to make comparisons misleading and erroneous. Proper instant measuring tools, as my Kenwood FL-140 W&F meter, are excellent measuring devices!
 
Did you calibrate your measurement system with standard calibration files?

Unless people do it the subject is complex enough to make comparisons misleading and erroneous. Proper instant measuring tools, as my Kenwood FL-140 W&F meter, are excellent measuring devices!
AM software uses a test record and software that do not require calibration. In contrast, other phone apps that rely on accelerometers and offer calibration options. On the other hand, the Kenwood FL-140 and similar devices require calibration due to their analog nature. The main issues with these devices are integration time and the measurement standard. Older wow and flutter (w&f) meters, like the Kenwood FL-140, are instant measuring tools with incredibly short or no integration time, and they use lower standards, such as WRMS. Unfortunately, this is not good enough.
 
AM software uses a test record and software that do not require calibration. In contrast, other phone apps that rely on accelerometers and offer calibration options. On the other hand, the Kenwood FL-140 and similar devices require calibration due to their analog nature.

Surely. But calibration with a common wave would establish a reference for other members.

The main issues with these devices are integration time and the measurement standard. Older wow and flutter (w&f) meters, like the Kenwood FL-140, are instant measuring tools with incredibly short or no integration time, and they use lower standards, such as WRMS. Unfortunately, this is not good enough.

We find many conflicting opinions on what is the best measuring system. It is why I referred the need a common standard if people want to compare.

As I said before - I use "instant instruments" for fast control and rely on relative analysis of the 3150 signal spectrum for comparative measurements and optimization. My experience is mainly with tape, not turntables.

BTW, does any one know of a good source of test LPs with the 3150 track that are not too expensive in Europe and having a track lasting for more than five minutes? My test LPs are now well used, as they have short tracks.
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu