ML-1 back in the late 70’s started me down the rabbit hole. Replaced with a ML-3A in the mid 80’s. Both were a revelation versus the receivers they replaced.The pre amp that started this hifi craze for meView attachment 119184
ML-1 back in the late 70’s started me down the rabbit hole. Replaced with a ML-3A in the mid 80’s. Both were a revelation versus the receivers they replaced.The pre amp that started this hifi craze for meView attachment 119184
love airtight, enjoyRecentyl I had the chance to listen to the new
Air Tight ATC 7
Tube Premamplifier. And I liked the Pre a lot, now the Pre is playing in a second set up, which I do enjoy more and more.
(together with the Air Tight ATE 3011 Phonostage)
View attachment 120586View attachment 120587
the dealer likes what he has on display,Recentyl I had the chance to listen to the new
Air Tight ATC 7
Tube Premamplifier. And I liked the Pre a lot, now the Pre is playing in a second set up, which I do enjoy more and more.
(together with the Air Tight ATE 3011 Phonostage)
View attachment 120586View attachment 120587
Ralph, what sonic advantages do you hear with a true dual mono setup like this?A customer sent these photos recently of his Signature Edition preamps (you need two for stereo)View attachment 120709
View attachment 120711
They are handwired point to point with the audio circuitry on a subchassis built to minimize vibration and coupling from the chassis.
Love that PD444. After purchasing my PD277, the same seller went to sell his PD444 as well. Unfortunately, it sold before I got a chance at it.
Its hard to explain but it was very easy to listen to. I've been thinking about that a lot; if I had to boil it down to something simple, it made other preamps I've heard have a sort of forced quality by comparison. IOW music seemed to flow in an unfettered way that was very beguiling.Ralph, what sonic advantages do you hear with a true dual mono setup like this?
but it only dissipates 30W!Robert Kõda K15 è il mio preferito da sempre.
perfect consideration! if you have to use a passive preamp then go for digital control from your DAC, or directly with attenuators on the final amplifier.at a certain point not having an active preamp will reduce energy and substance from the music. better sources and better amps deserve the better signal delivery that a top preamp can deliver. hard to define where that line is as far as dollars. but it's easy to hear.
thanks.perfect consideration!
that decision would come down to expectations and the particular dac; the implementation of the digital volume control and the synergy between your amps and dac and your cable and cable length. generally not a fan of digital attenuation. but at some price points might be the best, least harmful, way to go.if you have to use a passive preamp then go for digital control from your DAC, or directly with attenuators on the final amplifier.
I am absolutely against removing the preamplifier which I think is the most important component of the entire audio system!
I use the Totaldac Sublime, which has an excellent digital volume control system, but honestly using dedicated premamplifiers from Dissanayake Audio there is no possibility of comparison, but the opposite would be strange! Dissanayake has dedicated a lifetime to premamplifiers after over 50 years of research and development, his tube pieces produce a holographic plasma of pure energy!that decision would come down to expectations and the particular dac; the implementation of the digital volume control and the synergy between your amps and dac and your cable and cable length. generally not a fan of digital attenuation. but at some price points might be the best, least harmful, way to go.
I have no idea what that means.Its hard to explain but it was very easy to listen to. I've been thinking about that a lot; if I had to boil it down to something simple, it made other preamps I've heard have a sort of forced quality by comparison. IOW music seemed to flow in an unfettered way that was very beguiling.