I hoped late 1980s type digital "glare" had been vanquished long ago? I think you may be focused on the more obvious sonic indicators of a digital recording? I am focusing on the perhaps subtle one I have always judged by.
I am talking about a subtle "dryness" which for me has always been the telltale of a digital recording of vocals versus an analog recording of vocals. Not all digital recordings have this dryness.
I'm just listening to it now on my speakers. It's not bad. The sound is a little dull, not very dynamic - soft and easy to listen to. Maybe that's what they were striving for?