How Good a CD Transport is Required to Sound Better than Streaming?

Esoteric-CD.jpg
There seems to be a fairly solid consensus (Lucasz Ficus, LL21, Al M, etc.) that CD playback or computer file playback, or perhaps both, sound better than streaming (assuming, of course, that all other variables, including the DAC, are held constant).

But I assume that one cannot assume that any device that can spin a CD necessarily will achieve better sound quality than will streaming.

So how good a CD transport does one need to achieve CD playback which sounds better than streaming? Where do the lines (rising sound quality of better transport and streaming sound quality) cross?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: shel50 and wisnon
Perhaps the ripper you use is faulty? I have never come across this issue. Do you use AccurateRip?
No, his Cd transport is too good. that's the problem. I very well know how CEC TL0 sounds, it's amazing. I listened to it hundreds of hours.
 
No, his Cd transport is too good. that's the problem. I very well know how CEC TL0 sounds, it's amazing. I listened to it hundreds of hours.

Too good for what? I questioned the quality of his CD rips, I did not question the quality of his CD playback.
 
Too good for what? I questioned the quality of his CD rips, I did not question the quality of his CD playback.
Too good for any rip to beat. Been there done that and CEC TL0 is not the only transport. There are many good Cd transports (eg. Zanden 2000 which I also listened many hours) hard to beat. BTW I thoroughly used EAC, dBpoweramp, XLD and still using them. The most importing thing is setting drive parameters right as well as read offset. Write offset is also very important if you want to make a 1:1 copy of the Cd and using Mitsui gold CD-R (MAM-A or even better MOFI).
 
Last edited:
Too good for any rip to beat. Been there done that and CEC TL0 is not the only transport. There are many good Cd transports (eg. Zanden 2000 which I also listened many hours) hard to beat. BTW I thoroughly used EAC, dBpoweramp, XLD and still using them. The most importing thing is setting drive parameters right as well as read offset. Write offset is also very important if you want to make a 1:1 copy of the Cd and using Mitsui gold CD-R (MAM-A or even better MOFI).

OK, so in your experience, the CEC TL0 is the best you've heard CDs, compared to whatever you used for file playback. I'm happy for you. But it changes nothing to my original point.
 
OK, so in your experience, the CEC TL0 is the best you've heard CDs, compared to whatever you used for file playback. I'm happy for you. But it changes nothing to my original point.
Assuming you're able to achieve good Cd rips, against which Cd transports did you compare them to think there must be something wrong with @godofwealth Cd ripping in order him to have better results with CEC TL0? And with which dacs?
 
Assuming you're able to achieve good Cd rips, against which Cd transports did you compare them to think there must be something wrong with @godofwealth Cd ripping in order him to have better results with CEC TL0? And with which dacs?

Your question is irrelevant, and your logic is flawed. godofwealth did not just state that CD playback was "better" - he specifically stated that in his opinion CD ripping generated errors, which he (well, his wife) could hear. I've heard CD ripping errors, at times, and things have to be terribly wrong to hear them. You don't need a CEC player to hear them, and you don't need years of training either, as he conveniently claims. The most obvious thing is to ensure that your CD ripping is accurate, which he did not state that he did.
 
  • Like
Reactions: audiobomber
Your question is irrelevant, and your logic is flawed. godofwealth did not just state that CD playback was "better" - he specifically stated that in his opinion CD ripping generated errors, which he (well, his wife) could hear.

Then please read the below comments of @godofwealth again.
I find playback of ripped CDs from a hard drive distinctly inferior to actual CD playback from my CEC TL0.
Playing ripped CDs or SACDs, which I do often, is a convenient solution but it incurs a sonic degradation.
The best SACD playback is from a high quality SACD transport (e.g., Esoteric, or even Oppo). The ripped DSD files seem to sound worse to my ears.
I don't know how clearly he can state it than these.

My spouse has far better hearing than I do at my age (biology is not kind to men in their 60s!) and can instantly tell if I’m playing a physical CD or playing a ripped track.
or this.
 
Then please read the below comments of @godofwealth again.



I don't know how clearly he can state it than these.


or this.
Right back at you:

"I find playback of ripped CDs from a hard drive distinctly inferior to actual CD playback from my CEC TL0. CD ripping involves spinning a CD ROM at high speeds (often 20-30x) that seems to incur a far higher level of read errors requiring much higher Reed Solomon error correction. In the worst case, these are audible clicks when the ripper was unable to correct errors. Playing ripped CDs or SACDs, which I do often, is a convenient solution but it incurs a sonic degradation. As the saying goes, what the Lord giveth, the Lord taketh away."

So the obvious questions are:

- was the CD ripped with AccurateRip verification? Could the CD ripper be defective?

- could there possibly be issues with the file playback?

Anyway, it's not that important - if he is happing playing CDs with his CEC.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: dan31
So the obvious questions are:

- was the CD ripped with AccurateRip verification? Could the CD ripper be effective?

- could there possibly be issues with the file playback?
Only obvious thing is if you have known how CEC TL0 or other top transports sound like you wouldn't ask those questions in the first place.
 
One can only form opinions in high end audio based on long experience. I vividly remember getting my first portable Sony Discman in the late 1980s and thinking that this simple portable CD player was the best possible sound one could get. In fact if you own CDs from that period, they all came with that slogan — best possible sound or words to that effect. When I hooked up the Discman to my then modest grad student home stereo, I was horrified to hear how bad it sounded. Completely lacking in dynamics and sounded throttled and compressed. I learned an early lesson in not trusting manufacturer’s specifications, a lesson that’s been reinforced many times over in the past few decades. I have a PhD in computer science, taught for many years at one of the world’s leading PhD program in CS, taken graduate level courses in digital signal processing and I’m wonky enough that I can pretty much grok any DSP math paper. But that doesn’t mean I ignore what my ears tell me. If it doesn’t sound “right” to my ears, that’s all the “proof” I need. Your views might differ. Plenty of folks on audiosciencereview.com believe the only thing that matters is SINAD distortion. If a DAC has better SINAD measurements, it’s better, period. They conveniently ignore the reality that even the world’s worst DAC has a million times lower distortion than the world’s best loudspeaker or headphone. SINAD tells you very little. But if you think SINAD is all that matters, you can save yourself a ton of money, buy a $300 DAC from Topping or one of the many similar brands and be done with it. I actually have one of those DACs and listen to it once in a while to remind myself why SINAD means zilch. It’s my own view developed over decades of listening. Nothing more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mtemur
One can only form opinions in high end audio based on long experience.
honestly; i don't agree that decades of techie experience has much to do validating how streaming and CD music reproduction performance compare. it might allow you to answer techie history questions, and articulate your opinions with details others cannot. and that has value to help us all understand technology as far as that goes. but not much use choosing the best sounding alternatives.

i don't mean to be disrespectful to your work in these fields. we all get the benefit of people moving the technology forward. thank you.

more valuable would be keeping up with the highest state of the art digital music reproduction performance, and having in system analog references to gauge digital music performance progress. some would also say live music listening experience is very valuable.

ultimately it's the listening opinions that count. those experiences. what did you hear? in what context?

not how we got here, and not how stuff works.

just my 2 cents.

But that doesn’t mean I ignore what my ears tell me. If it doesn’t sound “right” to my ears, that’s all the “proof” I need.
100% agree.
 
Last edited:
One can only form opinions in high end audio based on long experience. I vividly remember getting my first portable Sony Discman in the late 1980s and thinking that this simple portable CD player was the best possible sound one could get. In fact if you own CDs from that period, they all came with that slogan — best possible sound or words to that effect. When I hooked up the Discman to my then modest grad student home stereo, I was horrified to hear how bad it sounded. Completely lacking in dynamics and sounded throttled and compressed. I learned an early lesson in not trusting manufacturer’s specifications, a lesson that’s been reinforced many times over in the past few decades. I have a PhD in computer science, taught for many years at one of the world’s leading PhD program in CS, taken graduate level courses in digital signal processing and I’m wonky enough that I can pretty much grok any DSP math paper. But that doesn’t mean I ignore what my ears tell me. If it doesn’t sound “right” to my ears, that’s all the “proof” I need. Your views might differ. Plenty of folks on audiosciencereview.com believe the only thing that matters is SINAD distortion. If a DAC has better SINAD measurements, it’s better, period. They conveniently ignore the reality that even the world’s worst DAC has a million times lower distortion than the world’s best loudspeaker or headphone. SINAD tells you very little. But if you think SINAD is all that matters, you can save yourself a ton of money, buy a $300 DAC from Topping or one of the many similar brands and be done with it. I actually have one of those DACs and listen to it once in a while to remind myself why SINAD means zilch. It’s my own view developed over decades of listening. Nothing more.
If this is a reply to my questions about CD ripping then it is completely off topic. I'm sorry if you took my questions as personal attacks - they were not. By the way, I don't care about measurements, I just listen, like you do, and I've been doing that all my life, as everyone else here surely has.
 
i've listened to this new TEAC transport now most of the afternoon. initially it was brittle sounding, got a little better, but was very 'digital', even through the Wadax Reference dac with the upgraded Akasa DC cables. my plan was to listen for awhile before i tried the clock, but this was not looking good.

soooo, 45 minutes in, i switched my Shunyata Sigma v2 Clock 50 cable from the Esoteric T1 turntable to the TEAC transport. toggled the transport setting to 'clock 'on', the clock sync'd, and played a CD.

immediately, within a couple seconds it was transformed to something closer to the realm of the Wadax Reference Server w/power supply.....Level 4 Wadax streaming. natural balance and immersive, zero digital signature. i need a few weeks to know more where it stands relative to highest level streaming........but it does not suck. and so far my sense is that this is 'good enough' to function as a CD source in the short term to see if i want to keep it or even upgrade it later to the Wadax Studio Transport.

i have not been around transports for awhile. i know that the best interfaces make a huge difference in transport performance. but maybe even with the lowly rca S/PDIF interface (with a decent Shunyata Alpha v2 S/PDIF cable) when you add in a very spendy clock + the Shunyata Sigma V2 Clock 50 cable, that resembles a top level interface in some ways? i'm no expert here, just speculating.

i have no idea how good a clock one needs to push this modest transport to this level. but with this clock connected i am very impressed by what i'm hearing. obviously the Wadax is doing the heavy lifting. but without the right clock, likely don't bother with this transport. my streaming stomps it completely......and it was not very listenable to my ears.
 
Last edited:
The two best sources in my house are:

1. For digital, the CEC TL0 belt-driven CD transport, which blows away any streamer I’ve heard. It’s the best sounding CD transport I’ve heard in 35 years. Worth every penny. I have the original TL0, not the latest version which I haven’t heard.

2. For analog, it’s my fully restored Garrard 301 table outfitted with a true mono Miyajima Zero Infinity. Mono vinyl absolutely trounces any stereo LP I’ve heard. It’s like a different sonic galaxy. The timbres and dynamic of mono vinyl make stereo vinyl sound like AM radio, in some sense.

Streaming is nice and convenient. High resolution streaming, sadly, is no better and often worse than Redbook CD playback. Eventually streamers will get better. But I haven’t tried any true high end streamer like a Taiko or Wadax. So, my opinion here may get revised once I decide to invest in something like the Taiko Olympus. The streamer market is too volatile. I’m waiting till the dust settles.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ationg and mtemur
… I ended this debate by buying a Metronome CD Transport - sounds better than the streamed/ripped/downloaded music and brought the experience of playing CDs back… I actually went to the basement and starting setting up CD shelves again… why try making streaming sound as good as a CDT when you can just easily buy a decent CDT and be happy? Also I love collecting physical MEDIA - it`s a central part of enjoying the music to me.

Keeping it simple

1. Play vinyl when available
2. Play CD if vinyl is not available
3. Play stream/download when CD is not available

Can`t beat the logic ;-)

Cheers,
 
… I ended this debate by buying a Metronome CD Transport - sounds better than the streamed/ripped/downloaded music and brought the experience of playing CDs back… I actually went to the basement and starting setting up CD shelves again… why try making streaming sound as good as a CDT when you can just easily buy a decent CDT and be happy? Also I love collecting physical MEDIA - it`s a central part of enjoying the music to me.

Keeping it simple

1. Play vinyl when available
2. Play CD if vinyl is not available
3. Play stream/download when CD is not available

Can`t beat the logic ;-)

Cheers,
As well as my logic for media source choice same as your precedence listing 'skinnyfla', I also have another precedence listing as follows;

1. Vinyl - For critical and deep concentration listening and when I have time to play vinyl and just to sit down and listen to music and doing nothing else but listen to the music I am playing.

2. CD - More convenient (for me) than vinyl for concentration listening when I don't have the time to play vinyl and also for background music when I am working / watching TV (i.e. sporting events with TV sound muted)

3. Streaming from internet and playing PC music files - Most convenient (for me) than vinyl and CD when I just want to listen to background music when I am working / watching TV (i.e. sporting events with TV sound muted)
 
  • Like
Reactions: skinnyfla
… I ended this debate by buying a Metronome CD Transport - sounds better than the streamed/ripped/downloaded music and brought the experience of playing CDs back… I actually went to the basement and starting setting up CD shelves again… why try making streaming sound as good as a CDT when you can just easily buy a decent CDT and be happy? Also I love collecting physical MEDIA - it`s a central part of enjoying the music to me.

Keeping it simple

1. Play vinyl when available
2. Play CD if vinyl is not available
3. Play stream/download when CD is not available

Can`t beat the logic ;-)

Cheers,

Great choice , I wish you joy of your Metronome … Still leaves a slot available for tape / cassette tho ;0}
 
  • Like
Reactions: skinnyfla
… I ended this debate by buying a Metronome CD Transport - sounds better than the streamed/ripped/downloaded music and brought the experience of playing CDs back… I actually went to the basement and starting setting up CD shelves again… why try making streaming sound as good as a CDT when you can just easily buy a decent CDT and be happy? Also I love collecting physical MEDIA - it`s a central part of enjoying the music to me.

Keeping it simple

1. Play vinyl when available
2. Play CD if vinyl is not available
3. Play stream/download when CD is not available

Can`t beat the logic ;-)

Cheers,
And normal people are all selling or giving away their CD collections, a great time to buy used CD's for almost nothing :)
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu