Apogee Full range

I've read some of your posts Mike

david

Ouch. Sorry to hear that mate, I went through that too and know how it feels
 
Ouch. Sorry to hear that mate, I went through that too and know how it feels

Hopefully the next gen of SS amps will help you get over the emotional scarring :)
 
Maybe, if such an animal ever comes to life... I've read some of your posts Mike, we approach this hobby from different perspectives and our definitions of extreme "accuracy" doesn't have the same meaning either :).

david

The wonderful thing about these "extreme accurate" amps is, they have the capability to emulate the sound you like, but the amps you like will never be able to emulate them :) So we can please all with these amps, but only a small handful with yours :)
 
The wonderful thing about these "extreme accurate" amps is, they have the capability to emulate the sound you like, but the amps you like will never be able to emulate them :) So we can please all with these amps, but only a small handful with yours :)

How come I never heard them emulate anything I like?

david
 
How come I never heard them emulate anything I like?

david

This is because you've never heard these emulation algorithms in action before.
 
. . . "And on upper frequencies:

". . . the Nº53’s most salient characteristic was an immediacy, incisiveness, and vividness in the upper midrange and lower treble. This region was upfront and centerstage, bringing high-frequency detail to the fore and infusing timbres with palpable presence."

. . .

"The Nº53’s somewhat forward spatial perspective, slight emphasis on the upper-midrange and treble, and vivid soundstaging will suit some listeners more than others. If you lean toward the warm, forgiving, and rounded presentation of a single-ended triode amplifier, the Nº53 will likely not be your cup of tea. For those listeners who want to hear, with great precision and vivid clarity, every last detail on a recording, the Mark Levinson Nº53 will likely be a revelation."

I read this loudly and clearly as this amplifier is bright, edgy, analytical and fatiguing. This may be exactly what some people look for in an amplifier. This is the opposite of what I look for in an amplifier.
 
Last edited:
This is because you've never heard these emulation algorithms in action before.

What do I care about the wannabe when I can have the original? It's the same thing with digital photography, 30+ years of trying to emulate film! There's certainly a lot of analog envy going on with digital :cool:!

david
 
What do I care about the wannabe when I can have the original? It's the same thing with digital photography, 30+ years of trying to emulate film!

david

Efficiency, reliability,cost, form factor, ability to drive difficult loads, excellent low frequency response and power, not limited to ultra high efficiency speakers. I suppose besides those factors, not much reason.

I suppose you will say this camera takes poor photo's as well :)

2111=1285-_DPD0156-Edit.jpg
 
Efficiency, reliability,cost, form factor, ability to drive difficult loads, excellent low frequency response and power, not limited to ultra high efficiency speakers. I suppose besides those factors, not much reason.

If only all that added up to "Natural" sound...

david
 
I read this loudly and clearly as this amplifier is bright, edgy, analytical and fatiguing.
I have listened for hundreds of hours to this amplifier. Never had any ear fatigue that was not related to overly bright and compressed recordings. With well recorded music I can listen for days on end with absolutely no brightness, fatigue, edgy and whatever analytic is :).

But no, it is no tube amp that rolls off the highs for you. And it won't compensate for bright sounding loudspeakers. Vast majority of the high-end systems I heard at RMAF were as you say by the way and gave me a headache. So it is not like I am not sensitive to it.

As I said, there is a lot that is wrong in RH's review. And that of what ddk posts. Decide if you listen to them or the person who knows how they work and uses this amp over his $20,000 linear amplifier.
 
As I said, there is a lot that is wrong in RH's review. And that of what ddk posts. Decide if you listen to them or the person who knows how they work and uses this amp over his $20,000 linear amplifier.

So now we don't like it because we don't know how it works and not because of how it sounds? :p

david
 
I read this loudly and clearly as this amplifier is bright, edgy, analytical and fatiguing. This may be exactly what some people look for in an amplifier. This is the opposite of what I look for in an amplifier.

To some extent I think the recording was also responsible. Here is the brass ear ripping track... believe me it was rawer in the flesh than on the video.

There's been a lot of brass playing in shopping malls live this Xmas over here and it just doesn't sound ear ripping. This did.

Sure it was show conditions but there's only show much allowance you can make for that being realistic about it.

 
OK a quick Shaz reveals the track is High Maintenance by the Big Phat Band from the album XXL which TIDAL just happens to have. I've just tried it on some mini monitors and it was nowhere near as raw as the above. Will try it later on the Apogees.

Something was wrong there. Amps - speakers - combo of both? One thing it didn't lack was life:)

My inclination is to blame a fair percentage of it on the amps. Without trying alternatives I can't be sure. I just suspect it. I had some $12,000 SMPS Hypex NC1200 based amps on the Apogees very recently and the mid to upper mid was horrid. All that with a decent pre at least price wise - an Audio Note M8.
 
OK a quick Shaz reveals the track is High Maintenance by the Big Phat Band from the album XXL which TIDAL just happens to have. I've just tried it on some mini monitors and it was nowhere near as raw as the above. Will try it later on the Apogees.

Something was wrong there. Amps - speakers - combo of both? One thing it didn't lack was life:)

My inclination is to blame a fair percentage of it on the amps. Without trying alternatives I can't be sure. I just suspect it. I had some $12,000 SMPS Hypex NC1200 based amps on the Apogees very recently and the mid to upper mid was horrid. All that with a decent pre at least price wise - an Audio Note M8.

Which $12000 Hypex based amp are you referring to? If it's the Merrill or Acoustic Imagery, the sound you don't like is the LM4562 IC opamp input buffer. I agree, not that great.
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu