You pick your own judges.
Pick your own sample in which you are represented twice.
Set your own standard.
Analyze your own results and declare yourself the winner. Not to mention you downgrade those who limited your margin of victory.
You really want me to look at that video again and cite examples. I have no vision in one eye? Are you sure we are talking about the same thing? If so I'll get to it tonight.
Listening in mono
8:50
Listening through rooms
17:12
Dispersion measurements for mutiple listeners on couch
23:33
ahsi standard
27:35
Sounds good measures bad
42:00
Phone call form CEO about Consumer Reports test
48:
Consumer Reports tes and choice of 13 speakers
50;50
Make up of Judges
54:00
Strong differences
54:60
Also See
59:30
Speaker comparison
101:37
I don't mean to suggest he went into detail on every issue. I have seen and discussed the Harmon tests before . On this forum I might add.
Basically he is making the same old frequency response argument at a much higher ;level. After all he has much more expensive tos to play wuth.
Good night .
I basically gave him a pass on the financial bias argument.
Way late to this thread, just wanted t say thanks for the video, very informative especially since I just did direct and off - axis for my Usher BE20Ds with the GR research upgraded xovers. Very good off axis response.