You hit the nail on the head. Have you been talking my wife... lol.Just hope your wife doesn't sell your gear for what you told her you paid for it
You hit the nail on the head. Have you been talking my wife... lol.Just hope your wife doesn't sell your gear for what you told her you paid for it
...my wife knows: just call Carl. He will help you sell everything. It's my audio living will.What will she do with all of my equipment when I pass?
Then we die and leave the millennials $XTs.
Interesting observations Marty. I think you are right. What touched me deeply were the blues driven tracks-- some of early Traffic, Zep 1, it was both a release for me and a way forward through a time in my life where music was central- I played (piano/organ) and found this stuff to have meaning for me during a very turbulent period of life. I think that age (mid-to late teens) can be a pretty intense period of growing and experience. I'm sure young people today are just as deeply affected, though the music for them maybe different. I still have a fondness for old blues and "heavy" blues oriented rock, though it is not something I listen to as much.This is a very thoughtful thread. Bill's post and others circle a key issue that isn't quite addressed which namely, is to ask the question, why is the reproduction of music so important to us boomers such that we have often allocated more discretionary spending to reproduce it well in comparison to the subsequent generations? I propose that the answer lies in understanding why the music moved us in the first place.
The way I see it, it was what message of the music that was the driver. The context for this started in the early 60's, particularly with the birth of folks music and the protest music of the Vietnam war. That was the source of so much of what occurred in our lives at the time which eventually that led to many lifestyle changes that persisted with the classic rock era of the 70's and 80's that followed. It was not the easy listening music of Perry Como and Sinatra of the 50's that captivated us, but it was Dylan and the British invasion (Sgt. Pepper is undoubtedly the most important rock album of all-time in the opinion of many) and from there the Doors to you-name-it. Put another way, it was the meaning of the music that spoke to us. It was the voice of a generation- our generation. And by extension, I don't think any subsequent generation (Millennials, X, Z) had music that was as deeply relevant to their eras as ours was to us. To me, our music spoke to us with a gravitas that I don't think the other generations experienced with their music. To this day, I can't listen to Billy Joel sing "Goodnight Saigon" without crying my eyes out. I want to change the radio station when it comes on, but I can't. I'm frozen in time. That's representative of the generational music foxhole I want to be in (along with too many others to be named) and perhaps that's why there was always the devotion to optimize the sound system through which it was played. My sense is that's where so much of the meaning (and joy) of our generation comes from and perhaps that is why the reproduction of it's music has remained so near and dear to us.
Damn, so it was YOU who stole my stereo system back then! How the hell did you fit the Magneplanars in your car?
When I have parties, the only people that want to touch my record player are DJ's. I never want anyone to touch my player, let alone a DJ, they usually throw the records around during a gig. I always tell them what my needles cost and that back off.....quickly. This ain't no SL1200.I was a DJ too. Man the cases of records I just tossed. So dumb but no idea.
great times at clubs I still love disco lol. rock heads hated it like the anti christ Jesus lol. remember the tramps had they play live at club I DJ at man what times.
I own a cable and speaker manufacture, Wavetouch audio. I heard many well-known vintage gears from 50's-60's (so called a master piece) and they are musically much better than modern hi-ends. I don't find any master piece in recent decades. New technology makes audio sounds more interesting (I don't mean better. Just interesting) but no musicality. Also, all those interesting sounds are masked by veiled/glare which makes the music dry, thin, and un-natural.
The purpose of hi-end audio is able to faithfully reproduce an original music. No audio company mentions the music anywhere now. Audio companies gave up the music long ago and they only talk about the technology.
In 60's, every body (include wives) enjoyed hi-fi music. Now only audiophiles enjoy hi-fi audio. No wife. Modern hi-fi is getting worse and loosing customers. Now audio industry needs new marketing to survive. They increase the price for riches. They draw people's attention to technology, not music.
New customer = Young People. YP will be customers when the hi-fi sound is good. I hope that happens.
Alex/Wavetouch
The purpose of hi-end audio is able to faithfully reproduce an original music.
I actually have an SL1200, they are quite fabulous........and indestructible. That's what my comment was about, how fragile audiophile turntables are. I should have been more clear.Ha. Really quite funny @jeff1225
Slagging on my TT...the 1975 SL1200! I had to save all my summer house painting money to buy that thing.
It came out in 1970, and still lives. But I know what you mean compared to some of the top-shelf TTs. Nothing but love for you.
That TT was a tank and became the go-to dj spinner way-back. We are bringing the generations together and time traveling on WBF! Too funny...
Wavetouch said:
The purpose of hi-end audio is able to faithfully reproduce an original music.
That's right. No reproduction audio can truly able to replace the original music. We can only try to get closer.Ron Resnick
I don't think any audio system can "faithfully reproduce an original music [performance]." I'll suggest that what you really mean is "recreate the sound of an original musical event."
That is true too. Especially nowadays, there are other ways audiophiles can enjoy interesting sound other than pursuit the original sound only.Ron Resnick
In fact my restatement of your objective is but one of several possible objectives of high-end audio.
Hi, that's a very interesting topic of discussion. And you may be right - many users nowadays are pleased with simple True Wireless buds or Bluetooth speakers. However, the good news for Hi-Fi, is that the budget section of the market is expanding more and more rapidly, thus making the quality sound more accessible to users with lesser budgets. Myself, I know plenty of people from the younger generations that are fascinated with audio gear, and that always gives me hope for the further development of audio. At the end of the day - I think the most important aspect of the discussion is our love for music. That's why we are all here. No matter how many or how few people are into high-quality gear, we have our passions, and that's crucial.I'm not saying the world will come to an end when I'm gone. Or that there will be no hi-fi. But, most of us, a lot anyway, are geezers. We came up in a world where almost everybody had a stereo system- not necessarily the best- maybe a changer or plastic-y turntable, receiver and some bookshelf speakers. It was part of being an adult. Some of us went beyond the norm-- perhaps to the level of crazy-- but we came up in a culture that prized that and there was a physical, not just online community, at least in places where I lived.
I think today is different. I'm sure the NYC market is different than it was when it was booming in the '80s. And of course, there is the uber gear, (some of which is blue sky and/or may not be for the casual enthusiast, whatever) but it is a different world now. As most of you know, I'm now in Austin which is a "young" town- the university here is huge and casts a big profile, and there is a ton of tech here of all sorts-- and money. Construction is like gold rush towns. But, even these folks who have money don't necessarily think of hi-fi as important in their lives. (My impression, not a scientific study). The younger generations may earn, but have different priorities- housing, for one, is quite expensive. And I wonder whether we may be the last of a generation who managed over decades to afford to refine our systems, our listening skills, our interest. Some of us have been at this for 1/2 a century.
As you likely know, the "pro" side and studios aren't necessarily the same as hi-fi. They address different needs. There is not much retail hi-fi on the ground here despite the influx of some affluent folks. Obviously, I don't know what's hidden behind the closed doors of a craftsman cottage or run down victorian mansion. Record sales here seem to be good, but that's not all audiophile; I'd guess most of it isn't.
Are we the last generation who grew up with hifi for the pursuit of best sound? And for various reasons, were able to realize that?
Know that I'm of the view that the mass market is based on convenience and cost, and think that has always been so.
And you guys lean toward the hi-end. So, this might resonate, I dunno. I think many of us are of a certain age, too.
I don't mean to be a buzzkill about this-- it's just that I'm thinking about how the world is changing and one of the important things in my life may not be as important to as many as our generation passes on. (BTW, I did leave instructions about the viking funeral, with burning pyre on a ship, horned helmet, and Steppenwolf at high db).