Rocco,
I was using the same cables on my stereo 911 without any problem, I thought. But I had different speakers before and the TADs are new.
I find that too - the 911 seem to be quite sensitive to the loudspeaker cables. If you consider that they may have an output impedance of 0.003 ohm, microstrip's suggestion of cryo-cooled superconductors isn't a joke or a facetious quip. Most cables would have an impedance far above 0.003 ohm, and hence affect the damping factor of the amplifier.
Or get Burmester's own 948 power conditioner..... which achieves the same thing without resorting to transformers. I would argue that you would need an 8 kva transformer for EACH 911.
I find that too - the 911 seem to be quite sensitive to the loudspeaker cables. If you consider that they may have an output impedance of 0.003 ohm, microstrip's suggestion of cryo-cooled superconductors isn't a joke or a facetious quip. Most cables would have an impedance far above 0.003 ohm, and hence affect the damping factor of the amplifier.
With the huge damping factor on the 911's I would bet that mono would be better. However, it would depend on the crossover design. Sometimes, separating the crossover improves the loudspeaker.
In mono mode now, I'm very happy with the performance of the 911s. Unless someone suggests otherwise, I'll keep it that way for now.
hi Thf99,
i will be going vertical biamping (passive) mode. let me see the results and i will let you know. as i mentioned before, this was the suggested course of action by the burmester guys themselves.
please let me know your views on how the monos have improved the sound stage and imaging.
cheers
sujay
hi Thf99,
i will be going vertical biamping (passive) mode. let me see the results and i will let you know. as i mentioned before, this was the suggested course of action by the burmester guys themselves.
please let me know your views on how the monos have improved the sound stage and imaging.
cheers
sujay
My observations suggest that the burmester guys may not be always right. Like they say, to each his own.
If you look at the manual for the 808, it says if you decide to use the remote control, the volume knob should be set at 12. The speed and the dynamism are gone if you do that. It may be slightly more refined. For me, I prefer to turn the volume knob all the way to the maximum. Based on Gary's explanation, mono seems like the way to go and while I haven't tried vertical biamping, I'm one happy man going mono. To try biamping, I'll have to open up the mono adapter cable and change the shorting wires, something which I'm reluctant to do now.
Also a consideration for most is the extra cabling needed to bi-amp. If one is using the super expensive variety, the additional cost will surely be a factor.
Also a consideration for most is the extra cabling needed to bi-amp. If one is using the super expensive variety, the additional cost will surely be a factor.
(...) I can tell a great system by how sleepy I get. For some reason, on systems that I love to listen to, I can not stay awake. I get so relaxed and into the music, I just drift off into sleep. On systems I do not like so much, I have to leave the room. (...)
Joe and Thf99,
Can I ask you if you performed this sleep tests under blind conditions?![]()
Joe and Thf99,
Can I ask you if you performed this sleep tests under blind conditions?![]()
Ha! Ha! I did not need to, almost as soon as I sat down I was out like a light.It's a good thing my car stereo stinks.
![]()
I have 2,000 watts in mine. If I get sleepy, I crank it up!
My 911mk3 monos showed up today courtesy of the UPS man. These amps are incredible. Full, warm, detailed, smooth, effortless, powerful and simply amazing. I am in heaven.