Tube means a lot of sound colorations and very far from a realistic sound.
I did not mean that either.
Tube means a lot of sound colorations and very far from a realistic sound.
Tube means a lot of sound colorations and very far from a realistic sound.
Rocco,
Only to those we do not have experience with great tube sound of high quality. Although I do not know what means "a realistic sound" I can risk saying that the most realistic sound I have ever listened reproducing acoustic music was from tubes.
But I never listened to a great Burmester system - I will do it as soon as I can!
Hi,
about the experience is not my case. In the years, around the globe, I listened in very known situations (acustical and electrical) the most important brands of tube gears. I spent years ago, 11 months in Japan for my work concerns (I'm not in audio business, but I'm only mainly a music lover and then I love the most realistic correct and sound reproduction) and at least once/twice a weak I listened for all period all Japan Tube Brands with their top components carefully settled with the most attention to details.
For my listening experience with live-music and especially at my ears the sound expression from tubes is well recognized and It's far from the "true concept of neutrality" as I intend with no colorations and euphonic sweetings. Of course this is my point of view according my experience. No any intention that my concept should pass for an absolute !
P.S.: About the Burmester sound, my personal reference nowdays. I wish you to listen soon "a whole reference system" ...Surely will be an amazing experience.
Congratulations! That sure is a sign of a great system. I miss mine when I am away from it. I still have a way to go for break in, but it sounds so d@mn good now it is unbelievable. I am happy and glad to read you are as well.
I'm sooooo happy for you, Joe. You'll be even happier with the amps when they get more run in as Gary mentioned. My xperience with the amps is exactly like Gary's. They do get better and better and hopefully, like Gary says, there'll be a quantum leap after about 1,000 hours.
If that's the case and I don't strap myself down while listening, you are going to have to peel me off the ceiling.
I started with a stereo 911mk3 and my dealer convinced me the factory mono 911mk3's were something special. He is 100% correct. From the first note of my new to me stereo amp I was hooked. When I setup the monos, I knew I was home again. There are some very good brands I have not heard like Vitus and Goldmund (I am sure there are more ...) but Burmester kills it. If there is anything better, I'd love to hear it but whatever it is I am sure it's crazy more expensive than what I have and I doubt there is better.
Mine are not factory monos and they are still fantastic. I just wanted the flexibility of having the biamping option. Anyone did any comparison? My dealer told me the difference will not be great if there is any.
From what people who have heard the monos (not mine), the factory mono 911mk3's are supposed to sound better than one stereo 909mk5. Maybe Gary or Rocco can comment when they get a chance.
Mine are not factory monos and they are still fantastic. I just wanted the flexibility of having the biamping option. Anyone did any comparison? My dealer told me the difference will not be great if there is any.
I wonder what it is about the design of Burmester gear that makes them so special? I see we have a mini-cult following happening here on WBF so this gear is obviously striking a chord.
From what people who have heard the monos (not mine), the factory mono 911mk3's are supposed to sound better than one stereo 909mk5. Maybe Gary or Rocco can comment when they get a chance.