People prefer many different things for many different reasons. But of course, the vinyl guys’ opinion is right. Jeez guys.
Can digital get to vinyl sound and at what price?
- Thread starter ScottK
- Start date
Your response is similar to what I say. Whatever you focus on and tune well will sound best.
I don't hear anyone say there is a large sonic delta between proper vinyl and proper digital. Its a subtle sense of air and naturalness with vinyl and a subtle gain of bass power and a type of dark background with digital. But most people will fail a blind test in their own home if someone were to bring their own source material to perform the test with.
A little off topic but maybe not. Even live, I keep finding instruments such as drums sound less airy and sparkley than I expect it too. Its sort of flat. Lots of power. No depth so to speak. Very not like a stereo. The outdoor lack of reflections makes the sonics very dissimilar to any stereo I heard.
Attachments
This is the description of a very poor, typical hifi system, where only the above difference is heard. You are right, in that case, blind testing might fail. What I am describing does not require bat like ears, it just requires a nice system that lets the obvious through.
Why is it then that I am very "content" with my "relatively modest" under $1,000 digital / streaming based system? It's quite simple. I "appreciate" the message much more than the messenger. Something to consider perhaps. For me, the first sentence of Joe's post (3,701) says it all. Best.
FWIW. As I write this, I am listening to the IDAGIO curated playlist entitled "Slow piano - the Art of the Slow Movement". Absolutely stunning.
Last edited:
In a good hifi system, what do you notice is different between vinyl and digital.
FWIW, I actually find vinyl with a clean record has less background noise than digital. There can be a grainy sound with digital you don't notice.till you do.
i think reading minds and trying to rank experiences beyond the personal is not useful. we hope that all of our musical experiences are satisfying.
OTOH as a person who has 'good digital', maybe even 'fantastic digital' and likely listens to as much digital as anyone here, the richness of the vinyl experience at it's best is unsurpassed for me. even though mostly the access thing does set digital apart in the freedom it offers.
in the last few weeks i've listened to over 100 pressings as i've played my way through a classical collection (listening at Biber, cleaning at Bruckner, organizing at Prokofiev); words cannot really relate how i feel about it. it's my highest point of my hobby experience. and so much of the music is unpretentious and real.....like life itself. it just is. and the alphabet leads me on my travels.
yet the digital experience at it's best is remarkable too. but........realism does matter.
digital is less demanding of effort, and attention to details, which can work both ways depending on your state of mind. but as far as that changing the value of the experience again, that cuts both ways.
just my personal experience as of right now.
Last edited:
Some are apparently desperate to be right over and over again. There really seems to be something verging on religious fervor . It’s getting old. Yes, I need to try harder to ignore.
And anyone paying attention would be aware that many of those bad sounding room videos are coming from vinyl rigs.
If
Would guess that not all vinyl releases sound good either given that folks appear to purchase multiples of the same release in search of the one
Would guess that not all vinyl releases sound good either given that folks appear to purchase multiples of the same release in search of the one
This is pretty meaningless. Are you talking about pop music? Are you talking about classical releases; jazz releases?
Those are very different realities as far as recording quality goes.
There are an incredible amount of digital releases easily accessible. I could spend several lifetimes accumulating many thousands of great digital recordings while easily ignoring all the bad ones.
Yes I don't doubt that you like a far higher proportion of digital releases than I do. There is no right or wrong, we just hear differently.
Stop whining and get yourself a turntable then!
And if you believe we all hear differently then what's the point of you being on an audio forum???
Last edited:
A "CD only" release that sounds really good, IMO:
Bossas and Ballads - Stan Getz and Kenny Barron
Recorded in 1989.
Posted in my thread but thought I'd share it here as well.
Nice extended piano solo by Barron starting around 4:45.
It's a studio recording but sounds like a live recording.
Give it a try (in your system)! Let me know what you think.
open.qobuz.com
Bossas and Ballads - Stan Getz and Kenny Barron
Recorded in 1989.
Posted in my thread but thought I'd share it here as well.
Nice extended piano solo by Barron starting around 4:45.
It's a studio recording but sounds like a live recording.
Give it a try (in your system)! Let me know what you think.
Open Qobuz
open.qobuz.com
Last edited:
I doubt that we hear differently. Perhaps I have put much more effort to make sure my system is built and optimized to sound better with a digital source? That seems much more likely. There can be a variety of factors involved.
I think this encapsulates how I view things. I've spent the past 2 months just listening to vinyl due to (a) my Horizon off for some repairs, and (b) having the RCA RIAA Mk 2 phono stage on loan. I'm by and large enjoying the ritual of playing records, but the big reward is the naturalness of the listening experience. My Horizon is now back and plugged back in, so will be interesting how the balance of my listening shifts.
There are numerous. One simply has to listen with an open mind and put all personal biases aside.
Last edited:
Similar threads
