And analog system so we know what he is comparing to.I may be late to this however may I know what your digital and system is?
I think this information is important in understanding the conversation
thanks
And analog system so we know what he is comparing to.I may be late to this however may I know what your digital and system is?
I think this information is important in understanding the conversation
thanks
My experience is that digital playback continues to improve as some very smart people are coming up with the great solutions, but that digital media itself is still far behind analog. I listen to a lot of jazz and the number of great sounding LP OGs or reissues is plentiful but the digital counterparts of the same music is often lacking.
I am in total agreement. I have also done a bunch of exploring on ways to make my system better. My system is digital based at the highest level. There are always things we can learn about this technology and we have come a very long way. I believe that analog is changing as well and maybe in a different manner but it is still evolving. Digital is younger, streaming even younger and these methods have been misunderstood and now they have over the last 10 years or so really accelerated their improvement. If one remembers they called digital perfect when introduced in the 80's.I have always felt that the shortcoming in all these “digital does/doesn’t sound as good as analog” or “digital doesn’t sound great” discussions is the lack of distinguishing between reproducing/playing digital media and the media itself.
My experience is that digital playback continues to improve as some very smart people are coming up with the great solutions, but that digital media itself is still far behind analog. I listen to a lot of jazz and the number of great sounding LP OGs or reissues is plentiful but the digital counterparts of the same music is often lacking.
There are so many albums that are never issued on vinyl that it seems hard to generalize.
You ignored my question. You simply repeated your subjective personal opinion -- which I accept, of course.Let's take your example of the North Dakota track, by Lyle Lovett, which you, rightly IMO, described as kinda dry and typically digital. The words I would use is absolute garbage. It's kinda like you can't be a little bit pregnant. Things sound real or they don't.
I am not generalizing. I am saying there are a lot of albums that have great LP versions and not great digital ones.
What albums are never issued on vinyl? Wasn't everything issued on vinyl prior to 1990? Are you talking about newer albums?
If that were true, then vinyl sales would surpass CD/streaming sales, which is not the case. For classical music, for example, CD sales are still much larger than vinyl. You could argue that people who stream are not concerned by audio quality, but when it comes to classical music physical media purchases, that is less of an argument.I am asking you to prove your assertion that "many others" think digital recordings are "absolute garbage."
There are a humongous number of great digital jazz recordings since 1990!I am not generalizing. I am saying there are a lot of albums that have great LP versions and not great digital ones.
What albums are never issued on vinyl? Wasn't everything issued on vinyl prior to 1990? Are you talking about newer albums?
while i agree with your perspective about digital, classical vinyl sales, being almost zero, are not evidence of anything......except that no one is really doing any analog classical now. there are a few isolated things happening, like the DG Original Source reissues, but that whole genre of vinyl is absent pretty much. yet classical music is alive and kicking and there is a strong market for classical CD's and files.If that were true, then vinyl sales would surpass CD/streaming sales, which is not the case. For classical music, for example, CD sales are still much larger than vinyl. You could argue that people who stream are not concerned by audio quality, but when it comes to classical music physical media purchases, that is less of an argument.
I also hate streaming and computer playback
This is the part of audio forums that makes no senseAfter 206 pages It seems There is no end to digital vs analog debate.
I do not think about which format is better but my limited experience shows good analog playback is better to my ears.
I also hate streaming and computer playback
In your opinion and that is all that matters for you and your listening pleasure.After 206 pages It seems There is no end to digital vs analog debate.
I do not think about which format is better but my limited experience shows good analog playback is better to my ears.
I also hate streaming and computer playback
Who is bickering? Just some feel stronger about their positions and opinions than others. You can always hit another thread that truly interests you, rather than fanning the flames.Source material:
It's all crap. Extremely high variability.
It's a question of which version of crap you can tolerate on "your system".
"Your system"
Audio electronics, speakers, streamers, ICs etc.:
It's all crap. Extremely high variability.
It's a question of which crap components you can tolerate with your brain, it being fed from your dual mono aural system.
Seriously...nothing sounds real except for real itself. An audio playback system never will come close.
Bickering for another 206 pages won't accomplish anything I can think of at the moment.
I am not bickering and I do love Slow Horses and The Old Man.There is plenty of bickering here. Just a thought, but look at the advancements in streaming over the past decade. Video in particular. Using YouTubeTV is amazing. 4K sports in HDR, the most incredible picture and audio quality on Apple TV shows like Slow Horses with Dolby Vision and Dolby Atmos. This quality was unimaginable 15 years ago. It is all digital. We are in the infancy of digital tech. It will be interesting to see where a thread like this is in 10 years or so.