Cosmos-A Spacetime Oddysey

'Cosmos' Recap: 7 Things We Learned in Last Night's Premiere

by Megan Gannon, News Editor | SPACE.com

"Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey" premiered Sunday night (March 9), rebooting the series that the late astronomer Carl Sagan turned into a TV classic 34 years ago.
Against a backdrop of sleek graphics and astronomical imagery, host Neil deGrasse Tyson brought a new generation of viewers up to speed about our place in the cosmos. In the hour-long premiere, Tyson broke down each line in our cosmic address, from Earth to the farthest reaches of the observable universe, and he time-traveled through the cosmic calendar from the Big Bang to the present.
Some of these morsels may be old news for veteran "Cosmos" fans and space buffs, but here's seven awesome things we learned in the series premiere:

1. Jupiter has hurricane three times the size of Earth

Starting with Sagan, "Cosmos" has a long tradition of throwing Earth into scale. The first episode of the new series showed that even within our own solar system our home planet looks relatively small — especially compared to Jupiter.
"With its four giant moons and dozens of smaller moons, Jupiter is like its own little solar system," Tyson said. "It has more mass than all of the other planets combined."
Tyson then pointed out the gas planet's Great Red Spot, a hurricane three times the size of Earth that's been plaguing Jupiter for centuries.

2. Our solar system has a huge shell that no one can see

Our solar system is enclosed by a swarm of icy bodies known as the Oort cloud, but as a whole, this shell is imperceptible to humans. That's because these comets — leftovers from the solar system's formation — are separated from each other by hundreds of millions of miles.
"Each one of these little worlds is as far from it's nearest neighbor as Earth is from Saturn," Tyson said.

3. Our universe may be part of a multiverse

The "observable universe," is listed as the last line in our cosmic address (Earth is first) in the inaugural episode of the new "Cosmos." But as Tyson says, this may only be our cosmic horizon.
"Many of us suspect that all of this — all the worlds, stars, galaxies and clusters in our observable universe — is but one tiny bubble in an infinite ocean of other universes," Tyson said. In other words, we could be living in a multiverse.

4. Our cosmic perspective is relatively new

Cosmically speaking, it wasn't so long ago that humans thought Earth was the center of the universe. (Actually you can still find humans who believe this; a recent survey found that 1 in 4 Americans thinks the sun revolves around Earth.)
"Cosmos" illustrates just how dangerous it was to challenge cosmic mores a mere 400 years ago through the tale of Italian philosopher Giordano Bruno (voiced by executive producer Seth MacFarlane). Bruno suggested that we live in a boundless universe, orbiting one of many stars. His reward? Imprisonment and a fiery death at the stake.

5. In the cosmic calendar, Jesus was born just 5 seconds ago

Those who watched Sagan's original series will remember the cosmic calendar, which is a way to conceptualize the age of the universe (13.8 billion years). Tyson revived the tool, explaining that Jan. 1 would mark the Big Bang and the present falls on midnight on Dec. 31. At this scale, every day represents nearly 40 million years and humans only evolved in the last hour of New Year's Eve.

6. Carl Sagan and new "Cosmos" host Neil deGrasse Tyson go way back

One poignant moment in the "Cosmos" premiere occurred at the end, where host Neil deGrasse Tyson touched on Sagan's legacy in astronomy and science communication. Tyson showed a day calendar from 1975 - Sagan's own daily planner - with a meeting with Tyson penned in on a Saturday. Sagan had invited the then 17-year-old Tyson to Ithaca, N.Y., where Sagan taught at Cornell University, for a visit. It was snowing when the young Tyson went to catch the bus back home to the Bronx. Sagan gave Tyson his home phone number, and invited the student to call him if the bus didn't show and spend the weekend with his family. ""I already knew I wanted to become a scientist, but that afternoon I learned what kind of person I wanted to be," Tyson said in the premiere.

7. We are made of star stuff

Long-time "Cosmos" fans were waiting for this moment and Tyson delivered.
He explained that the stuff of life and the elements familiar to us on Earth today were cooked inside the hearts of collapsing stars billions of years ago.
"They get so hot that the nuclei of the atoms fuse together deep within them to make the oxygen with breathe, the carbon in our muscles, the calcium in our bones, the iron in our blood," Tyson said. "You, me, everyone: We are made of star stuff."
 
I love it and I am 42. I sincerely hope that the kids love it to, this is an important show!

I do agree as well. Having said that however the memory of watching Cosmos with Carl Sagan 4 decades ago is etched in my brain forever. I can see where they are going but so far they are starting with our position in the cosmos and so the first two shows have dwelled on earth, our evolution and our solar system. All in ways which are quite understandable for kids.
 
I found the segment on the evolution of the eye quite interesting and new to me.

Besides simply presenting scientific information in an engaging manner, it seems to me that the show has a distinct agenda -- to counter religiously based opposition to science.
In episode 1, the persecution of Giordano Bruno.
In episode 2, anti-evolution argument about the eye.

While I'm very much on the science side of the fence, I'm not pleased by the approach the show seems to be taking.
 
I do agree as well. Having said that however the memory of watching Cosmos with Carl Sagan 4 decades ago is etched in my brain forever. I can see where they are going but so far they are starting with our position in the cosmos and so the first two shows have dwelled on earth, our evolution and our solar system. All in ways which are quite understandable for kids.

The original series with Sagan was the reason I fell in love in astronomy and since then it is my no1 hobby. Every penny I earned as a child went to optical equipment and astronomy books and I got my first 7x50 when I was 8-9. I still remember it like it was yesterday when I went out on my backyard with a sky full of stars and the first thing I saw was the Pleiades. I have been hooked since then and Carl Sagan is forever a true legend and hero in my book. But, everything was so different at that time with no internet, computers and in Sweden we only had two channels on TV (both public service). Today, with the advancement in technology, children seems to be so hard to amaze. They have seen it all. I try to educate my children and take them with me when I am observing the stars or collecting rocks (geology is another hobby I have) but I really don´t see the awe in their eyes. I think this show is important and every one of us should see it with our children and talk about it. I must also say that I love Neil deGrasse Tyson!
 
I am watching them too. I have them set to record on direct tv rec,s. I watch each one twice. The info is fantastic and complex at times . The conceptions of DNA slowly changing I have read and understand . The non natural selection from us
With dogs I know from a long time back I raise dogs as a hobby. They say all the dogs of today have the same DNA as when they were wolves and the fact they are domesticated now allows the different breeds to come out.

Al
 
Don't take this the wrong way.... but this show isn't geared toward the advanced science geek. Neil Degrasse Tyson wanted to modernize Cosmos in an effort to reach out to especially young people in hope that the show will spark an interest in science again. Tyson wanted to reach the average person. A lot of schools' curriculum throughout the U.S.A are a combo of poor science text books (science light) and bad/incompetent teachers. As well, a good number of schools are teaching students to question science in favor of creationist/religious principles (A.K.A. "not science")

Advancing science & technology is what keeps our country competitive and a world leader. Progress is slowly grinding to a halt in this country. The future of health-care, infrastructure, energy, transportation, and so on...... will rely on advanced sciences/technologies.

I have three young children, we don't have many choices when it comes to education/schools where we live. Public schools, cyber school, & religious charter schools.... that's it. Even though our kids do well in school it amazes me how poor our schools rank/perform in science & math. Everyone blames each other, complaining does nothing. They don't want parents to help/volunteer unless it involves football. It doesn't help that our state has a school voucher program either. As it funnels much needed money away from Ohio's public schools. Sad situation.....

My two older kids (12 & 14) like the new Cosmos so far. I have the original Carl Sagan Cosmos On DVD boxset. The kids aren't hip to it though. It would be nice to see more kid friendly science programs on TV. I wore out the "Bill Nye the Science Guy" shows, but I can't think of any other kid shows. I'm glad to see the new Cosmos as the show is more entertaining/engaging than I am.
 
as I agree with your point , move if the schools there are so bad. Maybe as I live both in NYC and North Carolina
I am missing your point. But I think cyber education is fine after normal school hours . I am an older parent raising a 7 year old. I am giving him every opportunity I can find, and it is not all at his catholic religious school. And reading and learning on the internet is par with today's standards . I do,understand your frustration but look beyond it and overcome the boundaries you have before you. As for the program yes it's dumbed down a bit, but it's fox not NGC or other
Hi end programming.
Al
 
as I agree with your point , move if the schools there are so bad. Maybe as I live both in NYC and North Carolina
I am missing your point. But I think cyber education is fine after normal school hours . I am an older parent raising a 7 year old. I am giving him every opportunity I can find, and it is not all at his catholic religious school. And reading and learning on the internet is par with today's standards . I do,understand your frustration but look beyond it and overcome the boundaries you have before you. As for the program yes it's dumbed down a bit, but it's fox not NGC or other
Hi end programming.
Al

If it were solely my choice I would move to a different part of the state or country. Since we don't have many options in town my kids would have to commute upward of an hour each way to a attend a better school. While I do like the curriculum of a local cyber school, I don't want the kids to miss out on the traditional school experience/life.

Except for a Catholic school the other local religious schools do teach their students to question science & favor creationism. These religious schools purposely do a poor job teaching evidence based science therefore students are not science literate/proficient when they graduate. School vouchers allow students to leave their public school to attend a private or parochial school. Taxpayer dollars that a public school would have received to teach this student are rerouted to the private or parochial school they choose to attend. Schools that don’t teach students evidence-based science, like evolution, the next generation of students will not be able compete in today’s science and technology based global economy.

Like I said... my kids do well in school. Over-all other students aren't doing well & the school as a whole suffers. Recently the state implemented a new reading proficiency test for 3rd grade students. Only 33% of the students passed in our local city schools. I had to call the school because I thought my daughter was constantly lying about not having homework. Our city schools don't even have enough text books for every student so it's up to the teacher to decide when to give homework. It is the year 2014 why don't we have digital copies of textbooks for at home use? We have money for a new football stadium. There are many more issues I could complain about.

I don't want to over-work my children either. I've become the unpopular parent by educating them more than what the school requires. At this point in time they only see me as a strict parent and that has stressed our relationship. Hopefully as time goes by I can connect locally with others who value education and help change the current situation in city schools. No easy solution no matter how I look at it.
 
This series seem better suited for middle to high schoolers. Big disappointment, imo.

That's who the original series was targeting as well. If you want an in depth view into astrobiology and astrophysics, books are the way to go over Carl Sagan's or Neil degrasse Tyson's series. Just IMO since I'm a fan of both subject matters. I view the new series as some nice Sunday evening HD eye candy and not much more.
 
As for religious schools why worry About truthful statements. As they get older they will learn the truth. I am a Roman Catholic and my kids all went and go to catholic school. But as much as I go to church I am not a religious zelet . Information is what is important not dumb samatics of heaven and earth. I would not cheat my children in better schooling even if they went to a lets say Jewish school if that is even possible. As for pushing them you have the right idea its how we help the next generation. Anyone telling me stop reaching is just jealous of the time you put into your children.
I loved school but hated English as such I stink at writing . I have a good vocabulary but lousy grammer and spelling skills
My point is I am successful financially but embarrassing socially it some circles. Anyway teach and love them and get the return of it in time. Good luck at least you care about your kids

Al
 
I went to Catholic schools for two years. In the 9th grade one of the Brothers said:
"Nothing in science can prove or disprove the Scriptures and nothing in the Scriptures can prove or disprove science"
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing