Thanks for the test, but what does it all mean?.
So much has been said about transparency and provenence, that even what A/D converter that was used has been mentioned as the most important. If you look over on other forums such as CA and SA-CD, people say the best A/D converter by far is the Grimm. Well here is a chance to make your preferences clear and that (in my opinion), the Grimm is not the end all/be all converter to beat.
The files may have been all over the map as far as loudness/peak because I didn't want to do any changes, which would be another added variable. As another poster suggested, even running the tape multiple times can have varibilities. I ran splitters and made 3 recordings at one time to cut down on the varibility between takes. The only thing I did to the tracks was pull them in Pyramix and cut dead air. The cables used were nothing exotic (about $5/ft).
I will work this weekend on putting up more files as well as using another (more affordable?) converter. Also will be putting up PCM files so folks can form an opinion on those as well. Maybe the best DSD converter is not the best PCM converter. This just gives folks some suggestions on what to look for if ever they were to venture into digitizing their LP or tape collections.
Is the Grimm 10x better than the Korg? Not really. For my preferences, I like the Horus and Meitner better.