That's good guess. Would have a broad customer base because it's a fully professional deck (with servo-controlled tape tension...something the B77/PR99 transport did not have), yet it can also appeal to the audiophile customer due to it's compact size and 1/4" format. Any guesses as to a price for a C-270 if it were to be resurrected?
http://www.reeltoreel.de/worldwide/C270-E.htm
That's good guess. Would have a broad customer base because it's a fully professional deck (with servo-controlled tape tension...something the B77/PR99 transport did not have), yet it can also appeal to the audiophile customer due to it's compact size and 1/4" format. Any guesses as to a price for a C-270 if it were to be resurrected?
http://www.reeltoreel.de/worldwide/C270-E.htm
I think Rich Brown has/had a 270 and Charlie rebuilt the electronics for it.
I'll tell ya what I don't like about the 270 compared to the Pro Studer decks and it's the tape path. It looks like the right side of the tape path was just removed from the deck. It's missing. Gone. Somebody took it. Call the police.
The first time I pressed the PLAY button of the Studer A80 I was really impressed. The size, solid feeling and movement precision of the tape path made my Revox A700 and PR99 look like children toys.
Studer branded analogue recorder with audio electronics designed by John Curl .
Yes, A80 and A820 and extremely well built recorders. Hi mechanical precision and smooth (and also very fast in the case of the A820) tape handling with looow W&F.
Just take a look at this video for a special A820:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuJ9yNFVIFM
In reply to post #24:
If you like to know some more about hte history of that particular A80, copy and past this link into Google translator:
http://avaudiovintage.forumfree.it/?t=68509180
and even this, if you like to discover more on a 1" A820:
http://forum.videohifi.com/discussion/308350/nella-mia-stanza-dei-balocchi/p1
Yes, A80 and A820 and extremely well built recorders. Hi mechanical precision and smooth (and also very fast in the case of the A820) tape handling with looow W&F.
Just take a look at this video for a special A820:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuJ9yNFVIFM
45ips is WAY too fast for tape.
Agreed! I've sometimes used 22.5 ips with very good results when recording live music. A quite noticeable improvement in transient response (vs. 15ips), with only a minor compromise in low end response and tape-running time. Also at 22.5ips, you can use 17.5 usec play EQ which gives you a bit lower noise floor (Vs. 35 usec @ 15ips).
45ips is WAY too fast for tape.
Absolutely. I have two A-820 recorders, two 1/2" headstacks (1.318 series) and two 1/4" headstacks (1.318 series, one 2 mm and the other 0.75 mm) with all the appropriate rollers and NAB adapters.
Charlie Bolois, Vertigo Recording Services, and Martin Berner, Audiohouse, assist with technical aspects.
This 1" format has me thinking...