Hello Morricab
Glad you like them!
Exactly it's not. What you get is better low level resolution like the the noise floor suddenly getting lower.
Well you have to remember the when they originally went with the "diamond" surrounds it was done with aluminum. The problem with the aluminum was the surrounds added a lot more stress and they were failure prone. That's what lead to the use of titanium which is much more fatigue resistant but not as well self dampening as the Aluminum they replaced.
To take some of the harshness away from the Ti all you have to do is add aquaplas to damp the diaphragms. Makes a definite difference for the better.
Rob![]()
Well, I have now gone back to the old Beyma CP350Ti to listen again because I was finding the blend between the horn and the Supravox problematic with the Radian. The resolution and detail is superb but there is a lack of upper mid/lower treble power that made all that resolution somewhat spotlit. Also, I found the listening less relaxing and a bit nervous and the soundstage and imaging somewhat flattened. Switching the amps to 16 ohms (the drivers are 16ohms) helped a bit but still was not the harmonious blend I was getting with the other horn/driver combos.
Switching back to the Beyma I was like "ahhh". No obvious drop in resolution really but more space between instruments and there is more room in the music for instruments to breathe. That nervousness is essentially gone. I am wondering if I am reacting to a mismatch in the horn or if the Radian is simply higher in distortion, which at these levels shouldn't matter but who knows? The Beyma is rather famous for having VERY low distortion for a CD. I will continue to work with the driver and perhaps try it another small horn I have to see if it was a mismatch (the Beyma, for example did not sound at all right in the 18 sound XT120 but works great in the Iwata 600) with the horn. Maybe the Radian wants something more like a SEOS style waveguide or perhaps a more traditional horn like Tractrix? Ideas?
The CP350Ti has a pure Ti diaphragm, which has no audible breakup (also the distortion stays low right through the whole bandwidth)...not hard at all. The CP755Ti has a mylar surround attached toTi diaphragm but doesn't have audibly better highs and distortion is actually a bit higher despite a much bigger magnet and larger diaphragm. Seems they figured out how to use Ti without the need for Aquaplas...although that might take things even further.