i am a serious music lover. by any way you want to qualify it.
yet i also feel that there are no rules for what justifies owning a nice, expensive, hifi system. you can have 20 demo cuts you play only once in a while to hear how it sounds, or many thousands of pieces of hard media and all the streaming services and play music all the time and have great knowledge. and all points in between. or just streaming and own zero media.
some of us just enjoy having a nice system and the idea of the hobby. maybe they are into the gear for it's own sake. i have very serious audiophile friends who like to build gear but don't listen that much. or mostly just collect old gear. it's all good.
and some don't have any system but a passion for the hobby and music. that's fine too.
Er, maybe, but it sure is difficult explaining the pleasure your high-end system gives you to someone who hasn't got a clue what you're going on about because their high-end system doesn't give them the same level of satisfaction.
Why being a "serious music lover" is mandatory for being an audiophile? Or better, what is a "serious music lover"? Some one that only listens to non amplified music?
Snot elitism exists everywhere unfortunately… but I’d have thought seems to be even more so prevalent possibly in audiophile forums than among serious(?) music lovers.
Pity it’s a contributing factor in making being an audiophile appear more petty and smaller rather than greater or more noble… throw in elitist pricing and then much of it appears as just decadent and unserious. Perhaps that’s also the generational turnoff.
So music loving is just way cooler and for good reason because music is or can be ultimately art and audio for all its fabulous pretensions mostly craft.
Very little commercial high end audio approaches art from my perspective… I teach design and the industrial design element in audio has always lagged and often is just daggy… and contemporary high end is no more graced with a sublime elevated spirit than is some vintage or some diy.
Who’d spend many hundreds of thousands or even millions on systems on many of the contemporary boxes of tacky awkward bling and disjointed design mostly coming out of electrical engineers with no art or industrial design background.
Atleast with vintage you’ll sometimes see at least good simple composition and some truth through form following function.
(...) Who’d spend many hundreds of thousands or even millions on systems on many of the contemporary boxes of tacky awkward bling and disjointed design mostly coming out of electrical engineers with no art or industrial design background. (...)
The classic design of their Elgar DAC was carried in collaboration with industrial designer Alan Boothroyd, best known for the great looking Meridian 100 series - I still keep my 104 tuner.
The classic design of their Elgar DAC was carried in collaboration with industrial designer Alan Boothroyd, best known for the great looking Meridian 100 series - I still keep my 104 tuner.
It’s not a field of design where it’s easy to pull off timeless aesthetics though for a range of reasons relating to the context of audio components and forming up as a marriage of systems beyond themselves. Fragments synthesising into a whole.
This is the core fundamental challenge not just of the aesthetics in audio design but also in the fundamental music experience itself in audio systems especially in more complex processes often found in high end audio approaches.
The component nature of system building makes unity or cohesion more of a challenge but then the journey of pulling a system together is rarely about off the rack solutions… less is more is just a safer design pathway than when the audio ecosystem is flapping its feathers in a buy me dance and form mixing can be very diverse and conflicting.
It’s being unable to elevate function through to form that caps this off as craft rather than operating as a level of art in design.
That said often it isn’t just good basic form making at play… much of it seems unconfident so the excesses come about as engineers struggle to resolve form and add more and more design flourishes or overt materiality or complicating processes… but like I said it is a difficult discipline to be designing in.
Audio gear as art? Ok. But would you pay for any of it based on looks if it was not attached to making sound? FWIW my wife and I seem to purchase a piece from a local artist once a month.
Audio gear as art? Ok. But would you pay for any of it based on looks if it was not attached to making sound? FWIW my wife and I seem to purchase a piece from a local artist once a month.
This article made me realize how much a speaker such as a Wilson is really a midrange and tweeter paired to a sub. The cabinets are separate. Aren't the woofers just subs? The manufacturer advantage is they made the crossover.