Fully recapped right? Yeah baby! The only way to go from here is UP. Congratulations Mark!
micro-No, I don't have the VTL CD. I hope the 45 RPM version sounds killer though.
The KBL doesn't have as much gain as I'm used to in a preamp. Even with the gain switch engaged, it's still less. I guess the plus side of that is that you get to use more of the volume control range. I could never get much past 9:00 on the volume knob before without rocking the house down with my other preamps. Now I'm closer to 11:00 with the KBL. I am running balanced MIT ICs between the KBL and the KSA-250 and they are brand new as well.
I am suprised at how many folks expect that the unit sounds good without regard to how it will sound in his system, but I suppose thats just expectation bias and all that stuff.
And really, the idea that turning on the unit for a few hours a day will somehow make ti sound so much better in however many days is more about becoming aclamated to the unit than electronics changing. Yes, capacitors will bias in, and transistors will stabalize with heat, but saying it will sound even just more than a bit better over time don't wash with this audiophile. Ears adapt, not solid state.
Sorry, but have been around this block way too many times, and have seen others as well, but sure, happy for Mark to have a new device to play with (actually two).
I should have played some Diana Krall to see if she sounded as nasally as she sounded in all of the rooms I heard her being played in at RMAF. People love to demo with Diana Krall, and most of them shouldn't.
Roger-I haven't played any Diana Krall yet so I don't know for sure, but I doubt it does. It didn't before at my house, but I sure heard a lot of rooms at RMAF that made her sound nasally.
Bad digital
Roger-I haven't played any Diana Krall yet so I don't know for sure, but I doubt it does. It didn't before at my house, but I sure heard a lot of rooms at RMAF that made her sound nasally.
I have often thought Diana Krall has a smokey quality at times much like Julie London. Bad digital hash I guess could be the reason,you would think that most exhibitors at shows could spot that a mile a way.
Interesting does Krall sound that way live? I play her quite a bit and have never found that trait in her voice.
Vastly different systems....all reproducing the live event....differently...no, thats vastly different recordings, and speakers mostly. They should all tend to sound the same with the same recording if they were really trying to capture what is on the recording....but then I blame the stereo concept more than the folks trying ot make a living in audio reproduction given what they have for a source.
to continue:
So, Mark, are you telling me that world class equipment,
audibly changes its sound, for the better, if it is played hard for 8 hours a day,
rested at idle overnight, then played hard again for 8 hours,
then rested overnight and on the third day of playing hard,
you can remember back from the previous two days and compare the sound and it is now even better?
Just when is it "the right time" to evaluate a piece of equipment or a system of equipment then? The 4 or 5th day or the 5th hour after playing full tilt or what....is that weird or not?
How do you know when your gear is at the right "conditioning" point (or your entire system) so that you can "hear" this obvious audio difference?
Your speakers will be worse after playing for a while, technically, as they get hot (even pro speakers). That would be worse sounding technically.
I think it is mostly in our heads as we are more relaxed on the third day of listening, or even the second day.
But if anyone has some ideas would be glad to consider them.
I am not denying that gear changes with temperature, but world class gear should be subtle, and essentially inaudible to changes.
Tom