Are you sure you are not being hyperbolic? A "disaster"? "Abysmal"?
I find these reactions curious. I would certainly agree that the comparisons aren't up to snuff scientifically. But, I also cannot help but smirk when I read a post that negates the comparison that was done while using language like, "...remember..," and, "...fabulous..." to qualify one dac.
My audition process, while limited, does do the following.
a) It enables a review of the various dacs in one system - my system. With all other variables relatively constant.
b) It enables a continuous comparison against a great reference - the Vivaldi Apex
Again, while not perfect it is better than any other option that I am aware of short of buying all the dacs and reviewing them over a long period. If anyone has a better strategy I am all ears ;-)
I buy gear and keep it for some time in order to get a proper opinion on it after long auditions and a significant time. If it is not my preferred I get rid of it, or at less I try.
Very cool.
Please elaborate
Allow me to clarify please. The dCS Vivaldi Apex is a fantastic dac. It does everything well. Truly. And, it is a huge improvement from the prior Vivaldi. The aforementioned is, in part, why it makes a great reference against which to judge others. I do not in any way find it 'bad' or 'poor'.I was not reviewing the DAC. Just giving an example how different two excellent DACs can sound in a system.
My post was an answer to Ron and referred to fast comparisons (one seession, a few specific recordings) , not to you. But if you have the same extremely negative opinion on the Apex that Ron reported, I do not see the point in keeping the dCS as a reference.
I do the same as you - I buy gear and keep it for some time in order to get a proper opinion on it after long auditions and a significant time. If it is not my preferred I get rid of it, or at less I try.
To be true, I still do not know about your musical and sound type preferences. My fault, I apologize for it.
Pleased to know you got rid of the Wilsons and kept the stats
But if you have the same extremely negative opinion on the Apex that Ron reported . . .
But if you have the same extremely negative opinion on the Apex that Ron reported, I do not see the point in keeping the dCS as a reference.
Guys i suggest we should change the terminology so not to hurt the feelings of any DAC on the market .
Apparently they are quit sensitive .
All DACs deserve a place on the market,none is to be excluded
Happy to know.Allow me to clarify please. The dCS Vivaldi Apex is a fantastic dac. It does everything well. Truly. And, it is a huge improvement from the prior Vivaldi. The aforementioned is, in part, why it makes a great reference against which to judge others. I do not in any way find it 'bad' or 'poor'.
That said, there are things that some dacs do better imo and to my ears in my system.
I stand by my previously posted comments. But "extremely negative opinion" is your (mis)characterization of my comments. That is not my opinion.
I do not have an "extremely negative opinion" of the dSC Vivaldi Apex.
Surely it is your opinion, that I respect. I copy some of your words from your last post referring to the Apex.
"synthetic and unnaturally edgy"
" unnatural and silvery."
"made this lively track sound clinical and unengaging."
OK, I withdraw the "extremely" - lets us say only "negative" to avoid the subjective hyperbole. I reacted so because I listened to the tracks you referred and what I listen in my system is the opposite you refer. In fact, influenced by your old posts, I have used the Jeff Buckley "Grace" to demo the XLF.
Two thoughts...It would be great if you would provide a link to posts you refer to. Here it is, #76.
As for, quoting from the post:
"On Jeff Buckley's "Hallelujah" on Grace the attention-grabbing guitar pluck in the beginning of the song sounded synthetic and unnaturally edgy on the Apex.",
this could also be the server. I have heard comparisons of server configurations that did make the difference between a synthetic and a natural guitar sound, with signal fed into the very same DAC in each case. And different DACs might exhibit different sensitivities to the issue, making DAC comparisons under such potentially sub-optimal circumstances unfair.
As I said, I am at a point where I hardly trust any comparisons that I read on WBF or elsewhere, I have to hear things for myself (and don't get me started on ridiculous impressions from shows where things are rarely even close to optimal). Just this weekend I heard how suboptimal streaming could ruin DAC sound, and a simple CD transport beat it all, and by a rather large margin (even without optimization by a reclocker as I am using).
i see a subset of listeners who are serious Wadax intenders, who are open to actually buy one, as coming to the party open handed.
then i see the others who are not serious Wadax intenders as carrying their baggage of prior opinions and relationships. these can effect their views. especially since the price of the Wadax has the potential to effect their neutrality.
it's just the way it works. always.
none of the Munich Wadax deniers were actually serious Wadax intenders. no problem, but they are more likely to be affected by the price negatively. and it's natural and understandable. "i don't care anyway one way or the other, and at that price it's not as good as my turntable, or i prefer discs, or my dog ate my homework".
so my first question is always; are you seriously considering to buy the Wadax with your own money? then; i pay attention to what they DO. extreme prices do have these effects, especially in a product category with so many alternatives and alliances involved.
I was not pleased to let them go - I really liked the Wilson XLFs. But for my new space I will need a different type of speaker. The real proof of the sound quality of the XLFs is that all my audiophile friends who used to listen to them regret not being able to listen to them anymore. I could get a local buyer just because of their sound quality in my system.
Two thoughts...
1) If such comparisons are "sub-optimal" and "unfair" then why read threads such as this?
2) I am still anxiously awaiting a better approach...I do find it funny that people here discuss sound from components at shows which are on different systems in different rooms playing different music. And, yet they are quick to negate listening to the components in the same systems with the same music in the same room.
We are fortunate to have a relatively vast offer, considering the context. Bachtrack simply, and ironically, doesn't track it.I guess it must be a Portugal thing then. Just trying to understand why. I looked on bachtrack which lists all classical concerts anywhere, and it shows 2 classical concerts this year in the country of Portugal.
View attachment 94999
We are fortunate to have a relatively vast offer, considering the context. Bachtrack simply, and ironically, doesn't track it.
quick links
Música & Festivais - Clássica
Cada vez somos mais : Teatro, Música, Cinema, Dança, Desporto, Exposição, Famíliawww.bol.ptOrquestra do Algarve - A Sua Orquestra ao Sul
Orquestra do Algarve: há mais de 20 anos a promover a música clássica nas regiões sul de Portugal. Descubra os nossos concertos!www.orquestradoalgarve.com