Legendary Supex 900 Super: Koetsu before Koetsu

the Supex compliance seems to better match with the lighter DV-505
In the 70's, the tonearm most frequently recommended with the Supex SD-900 was a Grace 707, with an effective mass of 7g.I used various Supex 900's with a Grace 707 and later an Alphason Xenon (medium effective mass of 13g).

Tonearm resonance with the 707 is 14hZ, higher than ideal, and 12Hz with the Xenon, an ideal result.
 
Indeed. I’m trying another golden oldie right now, the Stanton 881 Mk2 moving magnet with the stereohedron stylus. It also needs a low mass tonearm. I’m using a Technics EPA 100 on a Technics SP-10 Mk2. The Technics arm is another fabulous olden Goldie with Ruby bearings and a variable damping adjustment to match cartridge compliance. This setup can see off most modern turntable systems made today.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mtemur
EPA-100 is not exactly low mass. (have one myself, it's quite good actually)
Nevertheless it will support a Stanton 881s - when the counterweight damping mechanism is still fully functional.
Use flat records only to protect the cartridge's suspension.

Best regards, Tony
 
  • Like
Reactions: mtemur
W
update on my Supex SD900 mkIV I got from @audiobomber :
got same job done as with my Kiseki Blue longbody; retipped with boron cant and Namiki Microridge needle by Aidas....fantastic result and intact tone as original, but much better resolution
after some time in Ikeda IT407 I moved it over in my Dynavector DV-505 on the DD MicroSeiki DDX-1500.....the arm cart match was obviously better from the start
however I missed the middle cw for the subarm and used the heaviest one and felt it was not optimal
yesterday I got a new middle 22g cw from Dynavector and the improvement in clarity and bass was very substantial
the Supex compliance seems to better match with the lighter DV-505
I´m not sure people are aware of how well some of theese vintage mc´s from the golden era holds up against today's overpriced carts.....
Wish I hadn't lost track of mine when I replaced it. It probably still had a few miles left on it and with the modern upgrades available it would be a great value. Many years ago now but it was a fine cartridge
 
  • Like
Reactions: audiobomber
The Technics arm is another fabulous olden Goldie with Ruby bearings and a variable damping adjustment to match cartridge compliance. This setup can see off most modern turntable systems made today.
EPA-100 is not exactly low mass. (have one myself, it's quite good actually)
Nevertheless it will support a Stanton 881s - when the counterweight damping mechanism is still fully functional.
I also have Technics EPA 100 in extremely good condition. More importantly it’s ruby bearings are intact and working fine. You can feel how smooth and stiction free when operating it but after all it’s a Technics arm nothing special. BTW I think it’s effective mass is 22g and can support 9g cartridges with standard headshell.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lynnot
I also have Technics EPA 100 in extremely good condition. More importantly it’s ruby bearings are intact and working fine. You can feel how smooth and stiction free when operating it but after all it’s a Technics arm nothing special. BTW I think it’s effective mass is 22g and can support 9g cartridges with standard headshell.

I have an NOS in box EPA 100 which came as part of the SL-1000 MKII set ( also NOS ) , would one not be looking at costing out a fair amount of £$£$ for a new production tonearm manufactured from the same materials and design features ?
 
I have an NOS in box EPA 100 which came as part of the SL-1000 MKII set ( also NOS ) , would one not be looking at costing out a fair amount of £$£$ for a new production tonearm manufactured from the same materials and design features ?
I agree. EPA 100 would sell for five figures in today’s market considering it’s build quality, materials and effort put in making.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lynnot and Argonaut
I have an NOS in box EPA 100 which came as part of the SL-1000 MKII set ( also NOS ) , would one not be looking at costing out a fair amount of £$£$ for a new production tonearm manufactured from the same materials and design features ?

This is one of vdh’s favourite arms for his cart
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lynnot and mtemur
This is one of vdh’s favourite arms for his cart

A good while back whilst rotating the vintage gear mountain at one point I was running another used EPA-100 mounted on a Thorens TD 124 MKII sporting a Vdh Grasshopper Condor Gold , pretty sure that it was an XGP-MO , Integrated Sansui AU-111 mit A-603 transformers into either a pair of Quad 57’s or Tannoy Canterbury 12” Red as mood dictated … A disparate collation somewhat thrown together , however played rather well !
 
Few old pictures of mine (from about 15 yeas ago):

5289781457_07b4e53a10.jpg

With Kiseki Blue Goldspot

5289781399_f4d85c363b.jpg

And the back end of the EPA-100.

Best regards, Tony
 
Last edited:
Listening to a lovely EMI LP of Tchaikovsky’s Serenade for Strings conducted by Sir John Barbirolli 60 years ago on my EPA 100 arm with the Stanton 881 Mk2 on the Technics SP-10 Mk2 played back through the Mola Mola MAKUA preamp with built-in phonostage into the Kaluga mono blocks driving a pair of Quad 2805 stats. Lush creamy sound of the orchestral strings that’s just so hard to get with even top quality digital.

1718927661211.jpeg
 
just a small update on the vintage cart track
got a Kiseki NS Purpleheart a few weeks ago and despite it´s not supposed to be up to the NOS I quite like it
so when I spotted a NOS Purpleheart Saphire in Denmark, I just couldn´t resist and I installed as fast as possible, when it arrived yesterday...
All the Kisekis are installed in original Ikeda headshells in the IT-407 silver on the B60 base on Melco, so very easy to compare the different models
temporary conclusion is that the Saphire is great: fullbodied, fast and with fantastic harmonics and extension in both ends
makes me wonder about the Kiseki Agaat....ha-ha
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2462.JPG
    IMG_2462.JPG
    639.7 KB · Views: 9
  • IMG_2478.JPG
    IMG_2478.JPG
    526.2 KB · Views: 8
I also have Technics EPA 100 in extremely good condition. More importantly it’s ruby bearings are intact and working fine. You can feel how smooth and stiction free when operating it but after all it’s a Technics arm nothing special. BTW I think it’s effective mass is 22g and can support 9g cartridges with standard headshell.
In an old German HiFi magazine, the breakaway torque (bearings) of tonearms was tested. The titanium tonearm Technics EPA 100 performed best. Simply balance it and then blow from above and under the headshell. If it moves up and down without staying in one place, the bearings are OK.
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu