Congrats for your Stenheim Reference Ultime Two. Should be amazing in bi-amping configuration.I won't be adding subs.
Unlike Stenheim, Magico does not allow bi-amping which is a feature I wanted as I have all the electronics for such setup. Hence, the Magico M6 were not on my shortlist.
I understand, Thanks for your feedbackI considered the TAD Reference 1 but their size (width and depth) was a showstopper.
Congrats for your Stenheim Reference Ultime Two. Should be amazing in bi-amping configuration.
Have you ever considered / listened to the TAD Reference speakers R1tx? Well suited for bi-amping too.
I’m sure that the Stenheim Ref U2 are amazing speakers, I never had the opportunity to compare it to the TAD R1tx and I let you the conclusion of their superiority if you did the listening test.Stenheim is much superior to TAD. Highly inefficient speaker one of the slowest moving, and really requires those awful amps from TAD to work
I’m sure that the Stenheim Ref U2 are amazing speakers, I never had the opportunity to compare it to the TAD R1tx and I let you the conclusion of their superiority if you did the listening test.
I can relate to the inefficiency @90dB and the needs for powerful amps to drive the R1tx even the “awful” TAD power amps but regarding the “one of the slowest moving” I’m not sure that I understand the rationale of this statement… Are you speaking about their beryllium diaphragm? Can you elaborate?
I can understand your conclusion if this is what you heard. From my side I have moved from Wilson Audio (WP8 / Alexia) to TAD being impressed by their clarity, dynamics and tonality. I guess that finding a sound that allows us to connect with the emotion of the original performance is the key of our hobbythe woofers move slowly. Overall music seems to not flow, and symphonies and chamber music do not flow and sound struggling to move. tone for acoustic music is poor. Have heard the big TAD, the smaller floorstanders, and the stand amount they all have that issue. Have heard with TAD, Gryphon Mephisto, Luxman m900u single and biamped.
I can understand your conclusion if this is what you heard. From my side I have moved from Wilson Audio (WP8 / Alexia) to TAD being impressed by their clarity, dynamics and tonality. I guess that finding a sound that allows us to connect with the emotion of the original performance is the key of our hobby
[please forgive my poor English]Stenheim is much superior to TAD. Highly inefficient speaker one of the slowest moving, and really requires those awful amps from TAD to work
Thanks, updated.The Stenheim Reference Ultime 2 loudspeakers that were demoed on the 15th of October did not include the X base and they were actually bi-amped by a pair of darTZeel NHB-108 MK2 stereo power amps. AMS had loaned their pair of NHB-468 to Audionec for demoing the EVO3 Signature.
Which is way above the TAD R1tx.Without the X base, the price is 187 KEUR (VAT included).
It would be cool for you to hear TAD driven by CH Precision electronics. I'm not hearing any of the issues you are describing. That said, I do plan to challenge them with other speakers, and the Stenheim Ultime 2's are on my list. (I run the Alumine 2 SE's in my living room system.)the woofers move slowly. Overall music seems to not flow, and symphonies and chamber music do not flow and sound struggling to move. tone for acoustic music is poor. Have heard the big TAD, the smaller floorstanders, and the stand amount they all have that issue. Have heard with TAD, Gryphon Mephisto, Luxman m900u single and biamped.
![]() | Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Ron Resnick Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |