I think there is a point to be made in differentiating between "natural sound" and "precise reproduction" of what is on the medium.
In the first case, we have set up the system so as to approach our perception fo live music.
In the second case we aimed at getting the system to extract and present the information contained on the medium in as precisely as possible, regardless of whether the original recording sounds natural or not.
Very good pointI think there is a point to be made in differentiating between "natural sound" and "precise reproduction" of what is on the medium.
In the first case, we have set up the system so as to approach our perception fo live music.
In the second case we aimed at getting the system to extract and present the information contained on the medium in as precisely as possible, regardless of whether the original recording sounds natural or not.
I was in no way excluding other electronic , just an observation about Lamm equipment Design goalsI think this is a good point to discuss. I would put myself into that camp but I don’t own Lamm. I do own SET and horns…but not vintage horns (ok 20 years old but not 50 or 60). I think modern horns and SET with similar level of thought and execution can at least equal Lamm. Modern horn execution can be worse or better than vintage from the examples I have heard.
For source, I think there is digital out there that can sound natural but I have found it needs tube output and usually R2R converters.
Wittgenstein’s Sprachspiel says word meaning is only obvious within the wordgame ( language game) it is used, and not any standalone meaning; and in this context I Believe Peter has created a word game and defined Natural in that game.As much as some on WBF want to turn listening into some big (elitarian ) effort
The dictonary simply states what it is : pay attention to sound / listen to music View attachment 95369
At this point it certainly does seem that not too many of the dead horses remain in an unflogged state here.Wittgenstein’s Sprachspiel says word meaning is only obvious within the wordgame ( language game) it is used, and not any standalone meaning; and in this context I Believe Peter has created a word game and defined Natural in that game.
it seems others are not part of that word game and are trying to make it a standalone meaning
I could say “water“ and you say there is no water here, but what I meant is I am desperate for water having just walked out of the desert
so can we please get past semantics, or create a word game for WBF so we can all stick by it
LolAt this point it certainly does seem that not too many of the dead horses remain in an unflogged state here.
Wittgenstein’s Sprachspiel says word meaning is only obvious within the wordgame ( language game) it is used, and not any standalone meaning; and in this context I Believe Peter has created a word game and defined Natural in that game.
it seems others are not part of that word game and are trying to make it a standalone meaning
I could say “water“ and you say there is no water here, but what I meant is I am desperate for water having just walked out of the desert
so can we please get past semantics, or create a word game for WBF so we can all stick by it
i guess i dont need to bother you with a Albert einstein quote then ;
“Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex. It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage - to move in the opposite direction.”
? Albert Einstein
Ps i m certainly not implying i m a genius , but looking at the thread i thought it was fitting
The problem with high end audio is , one cannot apply a Natural sound testbench /measurement system .
So its prone to endless opiniated /discussions DAC A versus B , Cable C versus D Cone E versus Horn F etc .... etc ...
None of these discussions can ever be won , beauty is in the eye of the beholder .
You are assuming that all listeners are created equal...at least in every other field of endeavor this is simply not true no matter how much societies try to level playing fields...All one has to do is listen and then decide. There is no need for measurements for the listener. It is pretty simply, really. And there is no effort to win anything. What is there to win anyway? That makes no sense. People do what they wish.
I do not have endless discussions about DACs or cables. No interest. Differences between horns and some other speakers, on the other hand....
i guess i dont need to bother you with a Albert einstein quote then ;
“Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex. It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage - to move in the opposite direction.”
? Albert Einstein
Ps i m certainly not implying i m a genius , but looking at the thread i thought it was fitting
You are assuming that all listeners are created equal...at least in every other field of endeavor this is simply not true no matter how much societies try to level playing fields...
Unfortunately sometimes people use this quote to justify their lack of knowledge and inability to deal with complex things. Stereo sound reproduction will always be a a complex thing, as it is mostly empirical, although with some scientific support, involving perceptual science. The high-end brings a diversity that makes it even more complex.
IMHO in order to move in the "opposite direction " we would need a complete knowledge of the fundamentals, something we do not have.
Hi Peter, I know we don't see eye to eye on aspects pertaining to your thread.Mike, I have not pulled the plug just yet. I do not need any fire burning. Nor does ddk’s “tribe” need to be riled up as you claimed earlier. I have no idea what you are even talking about. I would actually prefer it if this thread were only twenty pages long full of on-topic content. Regretfully, there has been too much noise and distraction lately. I’ve actually had much more interesting discussions off-line about my system and natural sound.
THere have been studies with functional MRI that this is not really true...Even a small kid can listen , there is no entry level / rotary club membership needed for this hobby , although i think a lot would love to
THere have been studies with functional MRI that this is not really true...