And fits in a normal/average sized room ?
Normal in Texas is different from normal in London. So it should fit in Texas
And fits in a normal/average sized room ?
If you try this here in the Netherlands your house will float....lola “proper” installation - wish I could do something like that
Now that is commitmenta “proper” installation - wish I could do something like that
Thanks for pointing this out, Bill
I do not hold a grudge against any attempt to create a uniform frequency spectrum, but this is only one of the aspects to consider in a audio system as we all know and in some cases in trying to overcome one evil we create multiple new ones....
If you try this here in the Netherlands your house will float....lol
I have heard the Lyngdorf processor many times and must say it creates a stable and pleasurable experience, however i was not convinced that a "simple" grand piano was presented anywhere close to natural... not even on their own "Steinway"> Room correction - again complex but includes frequency domain correction.
I have heard the Lyngdorf processor many times and must say it creates a stable and pleasurable experience, however i was not convinced that a "simple" grand piano was presented anywhere close to natural... not even on their own "Steinway"
This guy is truly lost in his music.
Well, for Peter's speakers the bass horn is already critically damped...putting SS on such a speaker makes the bass evaporate like the morning dew. I get the same effect with my Odeons...the bass horn does not like a high damping factor. A friend of mine brought over his Devialet once...just to see how it works on a horn and it was rather disastrous. We had to equalize the bass by several db to get anything resembling the bass from my SET. Also, the images and soundstage were pretty flat.For me going with SS on horns is a bit like drinking riesling on a cold night… brrrrr
I completely get that some speakers do need SS but for me the advantage of horns is to be able to get the best out of SET electronics and vice versa.
I would guess that with Peter’s Lamms the bass quality would align beautifully with his horns. More as a complex deep shiraz perhaps.
sure, most horns suffer in midbass and bass and sound bad because of all the compromises they try to do in that region. And the holy grail is finding the one that does it right and is well integrated through the crossover
And fits in a normal/average sized room ?
Normal in Texas is different from normal in London. So it should fit in Texas
Assuming not in Texas, it is an issue for meeting your criteria ?
Not trying to debate, trying to understand your holy grail. I agree that bass is a key.
A thunderstorm representation .... nothing more nothing less, would be enough for me...holy grail
I am getting good results with DSP/DIY horns...I found that the biggest problem with DSP systems is the DACs. Once you use your own, high quality DACs, the sound improves dramatically. That said, I will try an active analog crossover at some point (once I find one I think is good enough). Getting the time alignment of the drivers right really makes for great coherence. Getting the FR right doesn't hurt either (sounds better than leaving it native). Is it as natural sounding as my main system? Probably not...but one can listen for hours to it without fatigue.The role of dsp in horns imho has much more interesting properties outside of uniform frequency response namely:
> Higher order crossovers nearly impossible to create in the analogue domain - whether you want them or not or whether they sound good is different topic
> Full phase coherency of the crossover in multi-way
> Time alignment - probably most useful feature for horns due to the physics - horn length discrepancy between channels and physical design
> Driver linearisation although this is linked to “frequency”
> Room correction - again complex but includes frequency domain correction.
> Easily implemented active systems that can be tweaked without endless costs of physical crossover components
Btw - I am not a fan of dsp per se just highlighting why one might choose to deploy it for a horn system.
THX killed going to the movies for me can’t stand the sound, listening to music with dsp urrrgh!It is in the name....
1: Digital , many here have an aversion already with this term alone...
2: Sound, wel that i guess is not bad by itself...
3: Precessing, a paradox....
We can combine , let's see...
Digital Sound.... everyone knows what this is and nobody wants this.
Sound Processing, mmm still a paradox to natural.
So DSP is good in conference rooms and cinema surround sound etc. but has nothing to do with natural as far as i am concerned...
It’s like the notes stop talking to each other. The dialogue stops and there is just a disconnect.Can’t disagree. There is some magic lost in the process - not sure whether it is the A to D at fault or the signal “manipulation” per se but something goes awry with that emotional connection - just don’t get drawn into what I am listening to. My subconscious audio lie detection system refuses to suspend belief in the event.
I always tell them to shut up when i want to listen...It’s like the notes stop talking to each other. The dialogue stops and there is just a disconnect.
Much like the voicesI always tell them to shut up when i want to listen...
You can have the best A2D/D2A converters Bill and people think that they’re targeting some specific frequencies but with dsp you’re jumbling everything, the analog signal going in and what’s coming out have nothing in common.Can’t disagree. There is some magic lost in the process - not sure whether it is the A to D at fault or the signal “manipulation” per se but something goes awry with that emotional connection - just don’t get drawn into what I am listening to. My subconscious audio lie detection system refuses to suspend belief in the event.