Problem is if he keeps on playing that way coupled with his stratospheric salary, he makes very poor trade bait. Ironically, I believe that with an underperforming big man, an aged and ailing point guard and a sidelined franchise player, the Lakers, at 3-3, are off to a better start than last year with that failed star studded cast.
i think ron mentioned pau's weakness several times early on this thread. $19m a year is not easy to trade with, unless you want an amare in return. i'm amazed though at pau's downturn because in the 2008 to 2010 season, specially with the 2 celtics finals series, pau was killing the c's with his rebounds and points. he was so aggressive on both ends i would call him a pesky big man. and i guess those better years earned him this $19m paycheck as extension.