Bruce,
congrats!
i heard it at RMAF. is it any different than that one?
thanks,
The one at RMAF was darn good if it was the one I heard in Nick's room.
What type of EQ in there, passive or active ? and how about the output coupling, cap or transformer?
tony ma
No they don't.... I use my Fluke meter for calibration.
In order to do this I have had to utilize a new preamplifier from Analog Devices that has differential inputs and close to the theoretical limits of voltage noise.
We can actually experiment for ourselves instead of guessing on my part but based on my experience, it is better to use an outboard analog AC millivoltmeter like this one:
http://www.tequipment.net/LeaderLMV-181A.asp in 2 channel version.
Although I have not tried the Fluke 115 multimeter, some of the issues of using digital meters for VU meter calibration or as a substitute are with frequency response in AC millivolt mode. It is very accurate up to about 1Khz but when you kick it up to ~16Khz and beyond, it could be way off or not respond at all in some models from overseas. Most of the analog AC millivoltmeters respond up to 1 Mhz with +/-1 to 3% accuracy.
Ki
Ki,
Don't you need a meter that reads true RMS?
Thanks.
- Sam
Hi Ki
Even a copper wound step up transformer still much better than a IC, never fail in compare at MC cart RIAA phono stage, same thing happen in tape head circuit too, different in transparency and emotion
tony ma
Yes, Sam.
The model I listed and its 2CH version are both RMS millivolt meters.
Ki