http://www.audiostream.com/content/dsd-v-pcm-file-comparison-16441-2496-24192-64x-dsd-128x-dsd
Let the food fight begin.
Let the food fight begin.
Most of us who follow these things already know these thingsThe higher the rez the better, as Homer Simpson would say...
There is a limit to this. (I knew this too from your expertise said from a third party). Big smiley face not needed. Now let's let the real games begin... 128fs vs. 256fs. Who can hear the dif? And, what do you hear? Please describe it.
No food fight here, Myles. I've turned over a new leaf on this issue and have concluded that while I can't hear this stuff, it's my own fault for being unable to percieve any sound above 20khz.
Tim
But, there is a limit. I have found no audible difference between DSD128fs and DSD256fs.
Isn't there a theoretical argument that DSD256/11.2MHz places the noise clearly beyond the audio bandwidth into the ultra sonic spectra![]()
Isn't there a theoretical argument that DSD256/11.2MHz places the noise clearly beyond the audio bandwidth into the ultra sonic spectra
And "normal" DSD64 doesn't?
No... you can see in the spectral plots the noise starts in the audible bandwidth. Just capture a live mic feed with PCM and DSD at the same time.
So "standard" DSD has audible HF noise?
So "standard" DSD has audible HF noise?
Are you using the word "standard" and "normal" to describe DSD 64? If so, why do you keep asking the same question?
Are you using the word "standard" and "normal" to describe DSD 64?
If so, why do you keep asking the same question?
I don't hear any noise from DSD64 that stands out from my very low noise floor or the music.
But getting back to my question to you, I feel like you have an ulterior motive to your question which you keep asking. Since your digital leanings lean towards PCM, I assume there is going to be some type of slant where PCM has no noise associated with the noise shaping that goes on with DSD which somehow makes it 'better.'