Btw, how come there is no love for the Western Electric 275A output tubes? Seeing as folks are willing to splurge on the likes of Tak 300B and EAT 300bs.
@Sfox7076 Do you still use it with your Lampi? If so, which Lampizator is it, and can you give some impressions?
That's a rectifier?
After you have them anyways, you should definitely give them a tryNo, the 275A is an output tube. I haven’t tried them with my Pacific yet. I didn’t like them with my Big 7 MKII.
After you have them anyways, you should definitely give them a try
And report afterwards
Sorry to jump in as i also don’t have VC in Pac - high gain on all tubes and using it for months with Tesla RD27AS
I have never opened it up but I gather it is set to high by default. I am using Tesla RD27AS with a 596 Recti but I also like the Psvane 274B recti and the RK KR PX25 tubes.What gain setting do you use on your Pacific and on which tube?
As my rack is good old Finite elemente spider, Pac is sitting on Ceraballs as per picture while entire rack is on Cerabase so i would assume its nicelly isolated.Reading here today reminded me to experiment with the gain switches. I’ve had them set to the low gain (attenuated) position for the last 6 months. Now that the system changes have ended it was time to try the small things. I’ve settled on the RK PX25 for some time so am familiar with them.
I pulled the copper cover off, reinserted the tubes, powered up. First off I didn’t note any distortion or other high gain type anomolies. Just sounded like the volume control was turned up. Dynamics were similar. But it did sound worse. A bit worse. The sound was unfocused and somewhat hollowed-out and reverberant. I speculated the cover was the culprit and this proved true. The cover is heavy and well damped on the bottom side. Reinserted, the sound improved per normal. A good demonstration of how the environment can degrade the sound and the importance of isolation. Sound levels were less than 70 dB for this testing.
But the high gain position requires a lower volume attenuator setting. This preamp needs to run at a higher setting to function as the sound will collapse if just cracked off of idle. So back to the low gain setting. Higher efficiency speakers don’t help in this scenario.
Back to isolation of a different kind. Leaving the cover off is one thing, support is another. Currently I run DiDs (Daedalus Isolation Devices) under all equipment The only component that hasn’t responded to these is the CX used as a server only. I made my equipment rack out of a 2x4 and a pile of dowels 35 years ago. I‘m kind of thinking it may be time to retire this relic. What makes a suitable base for a Pacific? The server is the only other component supported by this 2x4 antique. Thanks in advance for any suggestion.
Glad to hear you like RD. I don’t have Taka recti but with WE274b indeed is a kick a.s combo.Right now my favorite combination is RD27AS/Tak 274B.
That could easily change but my weekend listening was split between the RD27AS and the Tak 300Bs and the former was preferred.
Actually when i received Pac factory setting was on low gain so i did listen in this position for months as i was lazy to pull the cover off and i did use 242/25 non stop. Later i moved to high gain setting and i prefered it more but to define now the diff i honestly can’t. SorryThank you, Golum. Maybe you can try the low gain setting with 242 tubes and let us know if you hear any difference?
David all non VC units have them and they are inside at the back of the unit at the edge of the board where the tubes are. There are two switches.It is surprising that my Pacific doesn’t have a gain switch or is it hidden somewhere?
If you can leave sws on high and Lower volume on player to maintain sweet spot on preampReading here today reminded me to experiment with the gain switches. I’ve had them set to the low gain (attenuated) position for the last 6 months. Now that the system changes have ended it was time to try the small things. I’ve settled on the RK PX25 for some time so am familiar with them.
I pulled the copper cover off, reinserted the tubes, powered up. First off I didn’t note any distortion or other high gain type anomolies. Just sounded like the volume control was turned up. Dynamics were similar. But it did sound worse. A bit worse. The sound was unfocused and somewhat hollowed-out and reverberant. I speculated the cover was the culprit and this proved true. The cover is heavy and well damped on the bottom side. Reinserted, the sound improved per normal. A good demonstration of how the environment can degrade the sound and the importance of isolation. Sound levels were less than 70 dB for this testing.
But the high gain position requires a lower volume attenuator setting. This preamp needs to run at a higher setting to function as the sound will collapse if just cracked off of idle. So back to the low gain setting. Higher efficiency speakers don’t help in this scenario.
Back to isolation of a different kind. Leaving the cover off is one thing, support is another. Currently I run DiDs (Daedalus Isolation Devices) under all equipment The only component that hasn’t responded to these is the CX used as a server only. I made my equipment rack out of a 2x4 and a pile of dowels 35 years ago. I‘m kind of thinking it may be time to retire this relic. What makes a suitable base for a Pacific? The server is the only other component supported by this 2x4 antique. Thanks in advance for any suggestion.
Right now my favorite combination is RD27AS/Tak 274B.
That could easily change but my weekend listening was split between the RD27AS and the Tak 300Bs and the former was preferred.
I wish a gain switch is hidden somewhere inside my GG2. But it is not. Rather annoying for a 15K piece of kit.