Late to the party. I just have to repeat class D comes with it's own rules, and that no doubt is due to their peculiar construction. It is absolutely necessary to have fully shielded power cables. I don't know why, just that the difference is huge.
I guess I can see some technical reasons, ie PC acting as filters to higher frequency junk riding in on the power lines and hence reducing stuff spewing about near your phono stages and your internal power supplies and blah blah.
However, not counting something obvious such as reversing the polarity of the plug (we knew about this in the seventies) or indirectly cleaning a poor contact or poorly welded connections in existing power cord or getting too close to your phone stage, then in my book we are looking at a
really nasty polluted incoming mains
or poorly designed/shielded (shielded, like for example in valves, all open to their surroundings or without proper filteration) audio equipment.
Why is it that everything is an improvement and why did we not hear the problem to start with? And why is it that this sort of thing technically would make an improvement hard for test gear to see yet in a room with plus and minus 12 db peaks and valleys and a sweet spot you need your head clamped in a vise to hear, this stuff makes huge improvements, and always improvements (OK, only 99.999999999999% of the time, hah).
nasty mains or poorly designed gear....
shoot me.
The ear/brain inteface. That is where the magic happens most of the time. I agree about the filtering effect. I agree we can hear changes. I trust blind listening tests, when I do testing myself (you can repeat switch changes, etc, until you do not know the condition of the switch any more, and do sort of a single blind test...its common procedure) . It is disturbing to me to read at the lessloss website how you immediately hear the cable when you put it in, then after three days of burn in that last bit of grain is gone, and inbetween those two days how much more of every audiophile descripter you hear due to this change. Paaaleeeesse. It is also interesting that after viewing their "scientific" but basic treatise video on their cable, they can produce no testing results, yet they talk about two years some body worked to figure all this out.....was it all done in their head and with no scientific instruments, and if any were used, there were no results from them....paaleeesssee.
In well designed gear, whether interconnect, or audio component, and especially if you are charging thousands of dollars for it using the best components and engineering blah blah,then you are not going to improve the sound of the compoenent, only degrade it. Think about it. And lets not forget that the designer is probably on his 20th reference component....by that point the splitting of hairs must be past the ability of anyone to discern a difference. Bang, I shot myself on this topic. Cheers.
...and by the way, I bought the Lessloss PC from a fellow audio-circler for $300. Quite a deal eh Frantz?![]()
Electrolytics for example, are never technically the same from each switch on of power. However, even though they produce distortion, virtually every recording you have heard is produced on gear full of electrolytics, and yes most dielectrics suffer from physical stresses in one way or another, but so does most every component, being that it is physical. Do you have any real technical evidence (from audio engineering society...peer approved) that one can hear a difference in a properly designed power cable after a few days?
I do not disavow that in a super noisy mains environment that a filtering type of power cable could help out by rejecting a lot of grunge that would come in on the supply line, but then if a component can not handle that then it is not reference quality to start with. Given a really nasty electrolytic, used without proper forming voltage, and with the right input frequencies, you can measure the distortion difference. It has been done, in the seventies IIRC.
We have been listening to electrolytic distortion all our lives. Apparently we are OK despite it! I thought I had killed myself on this thread but a miracle, I came back to life just for you Myles!
es >. I wouldn't want to insult you and by now you should know it ... But let's be clear that such unethical behavior should not be encouraged... I am even willing to accept that their PC makes a difference ( Believe me this pains me to even write so... but in the name of good camaraderie , I will grant you that) but the rationale for the performance !!! Bovine Manure !! It's insulting ...
By the way you can tell they know how to sell and to feed off the interesting gullibility of us audiophiles...
I would suggest you to acquire a used double conversion UPS by APC you can find these for less than 1000 and such model would be capable of power in your entire system with no problem .. then report to us ... Please don't continue to put money in the pockets of such flim-flam artists...
Wow, I guess there are quite a few audiophiles who are down on the AES. But then again, a lot of AES folk do rather wonder about some audiophiles as well. FES?, don't get it, but it must be against rules of the forum!
I usually don't get involved in threads like this because usually they are too silly to take seriously, but I will weigh in on a few points:
1. a line cord must be of adequate gauge to carry sufficient current so that the voltage drop at the amplifier is within the amplifier's operating specs.
2. hundreds of miles of imperfect cable carries the electricity to your outlet from the generating plant, grid, distro, feeders, pole pigs and finally to your panel and outlets. 6 feet of magic wire isn't going to fix all that.
3. shielded power cords might only help reduce stray AC fields in the immediate viscinity of the connected equipment, however, any well-designed equipment will be shielded against outside fields and besides, most equipment has a power transformer, which radiates 1000X more magnetic field than a single line cord.
4. If a line cord makes any difference at all, it is either because the gauge is insufficient for the load, or the input filtering on the connected equipment is so poorly-engineered that it passes everything coming in from the line, or in the case of open chassis tube amps which have utterly no shielding against EMF and pick up any stray energy of the slightest magnitude.
5. All the junk that comes in from the line gets converted to DC inside the power supply. Once it's through the smoothing filtration of the power supply, that's it. And if the amplifier has op-amps anywhere in its low level circuits, chances are each op-amp has at least 80dB of power supply rejection ratio, so even if the supply rails were dirty, the op-amps would cancel up to 80dB of the noise, reducing it to inaudibility.
6. The fanciest cable in the world won't correct a ground loop problem. And lots of ground loop and rectifier current switching pulse noise is inherent in the power supply design. Power cord quality is irrelevant in this instance.
There is a ton of snake oil shysters out there (I call it the Emperor's New Clothes because the purvayors of said overpriced snake oil products use the taylor's tactic of claiming that only worthy people can 'see' those nonexistent clothes), who, as such, claim that if you can't hear a difference it is because you are deaf, dumb, or just uneducated on how to hear sound. And so it is this plausible deniability that allows them to go unchallenged and carve out a market for fraudulent products.
A power cord's job is to carry the current from the wall socket to the amp's power supply. The only requirement of validity is that the wire be of sufficient gauge to carry the current without significant IR drop over the wire's length. Assuming all around quality construction, there should be no other considerations.
If you hear it, more power to you. Mind explaining in terms of hearing just what it is you hear as you swap them end for end? And have you tried the same thing with some moderately designed interconnect cables from Radio Shack....bet they will not do the same thing....and wonder why....cheap but more reasonable design for starters as far as this "effect" goes.
You take my breath away.
Regarding using APC UPS, have you ever taken at look at the output? It's fine for computers and such, but probably not for, sniff, the refined sensitivities of audio equipment.
Having a considerable collection of power cords (several from each of 3 vendors), swapping them certainly makes a considerable and obvious difference in the voicing (timbre), soundstage, frequency extension, etc., at least with the amps in my main listening room. Whether the Odyssey monoblocks are driving the Wilson Sashas or the Usher Be-718s, no doubt about it, the power cords are important.
One designer, Jeremy Ramsey at www.audio-magic.com even has superb power cables that are filled with a conductive liquid (see the Clairvoyant Liquid Air).
I've found that all my detachable power cables and my balanced interconnection cables are highly directional.
Per DEVERT: and power cables being directional, well, assuming they are ordinary wire types, yes, you can only push the end with the thingies sticking out into the wall outlet, not into the audio component...some snake has charmed you I really think....but hey, if you hear a difference you do, and I can not deny that no matter what. I respect your hearing ability, a big big respect for it.
I better be moving on or I will suffocate.
![]() | Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Ron Resnick Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |