No problem Steve, as was mine. Sounds like it hit you wrong from moment one.
Me, I thought the human stuff was nothing, though I liked the Dad with Alzheimers subplot and how it played into the story. But I found the ape story compelling and novel in execution. Didn't have the big time, end of the world tone of the original, nor a single image like the Statue of Liberty half sunk, but the whole third act with apes running through buildings and all that was something we haven't seen before.
From a visual storytelling standpoint, some really nice stuff like the two long tracking shots that mirror each other, one as Ceasar makes his way through the house and the other with the redwoods. Nice stuff too like the leaves shaking out of the trees all the way down the street as the monkeys on the trees advance. Liked too the rather bold-for-a-summer-movie conception: rather than start with a bang and mete them out thru the movie until the big bang which nearly always disappoints, this really saved all the action till act three, and did a good job using Ceaser as a ticking clock. But then, this is all intellectual stuff, that doesn't matter if the fundamental tone and conception of the movie doesn't work for you.
I agree entirely with Rob here... The only thing that IMO that this movie has in common with the other "Planet of the Apes" movies are Apes as central characters and similar-sounding titles, not much else... Different strokes and all that ...