Let's just leave it since you can't see that you re-jig your answer to defend your previous posts' contradictions and that's fine. It is what it is, enjoy your Rockports, they are very good speakers.There is no contradiction. You are confusing your experiences with the science. We spend a fortune to get a perfect signal from your front end through your amplifier and to your speakers. Today most well made components accomplish this with very little error/ distortion. Now even the best speakers add relatively large distortion to the signal. Look at the curves of any good speaker. +\- 3dbs or more. Any amp or cd player doing that you’d throw out the window. You take the near perfect signal and split it into multiple part via (usually) passive parts put together by human hands and then ask multiple drivers to reconstruct perfectly. Some do better than others but there is no debate that this is not an issue no matter who you are. Stop and think about it.
We require multiple drivers not because that’s optimal but because we have no good alternative at this time. It’s not a good thing in and of itself. I raised the point as a thought experiment .
Josh and John may not have told me the truth about their driver specs but they do have and did measure all the usual suspects. I won’t name names for obvious reasons. I retract my assertion because I can not prove it.
I’m not really sure what you are missing. The question was why were they so expensive which I answered. The cabinet expense. The expense of how they create their drivers and the time expense of two key employees/owners overseeing each crossover. As for the rest you believe what you believe. I’ve done my best to give the the theoretical reasons behind a simpler approach. Of course right now large multi drivers have some very real advantages. I never said they do not. Buy them if you like them. There are some awesome examples I’d love to have. That does not mean there aren’t some real advantages to a simple 3 driver 3 way some of which I laid out for you. Remember Andy made the Arrakis and he will someday make another. Right now the smaller simpler Lyra is better in every way both measurable and subjectively. Does that make sense?
Last edited: