I think Florian meant by x-max the excursion of the ribbon in the magnetic field, not the weight.
I know what he said and what I am asking.I think Florian meant by x-max the excursion of the ribbon in the magnetic field, not the weight.
Ron, how wide apart are the speakers? And distance to seating? I know pics can be deceiving.
I agree. But hearing the depth afforded by having the 2 feet further into the room (2 feet further away from the front wall) made me want to pull the Pendragons 2 feet further into the room.Ron, good idea to separate the two speakers.
Are the cables running over the floor behind that couch on the left?
How does the new configuration sound?
It looks like it might be kind of tough to get into your kitchen to cook eggs for breakfast.
I like to begin listening to planar dipole loudspeakers parallel to the front wall. But with Clarisys everybody who has recommended toe-in was correct. With toe-in resolution increases and natural detail increases with no increase in brightness or edginess.
Ron, do you observe resolution or clarity changing with toe-in? I do not doubt that the presentation at the listening seat changes as speaker orientation changes, but I’m trying to understand how the resolution of the speakers would change with orientation. Are you sure you are not just hearing a different interaction with the room giving you the perception of increase or decrease in clarity? I think of resolution as something different and dependent on other factors in the system.
H
By How much did you increase the moving mass of the panel by?
When I write: "with toe-in resolution increases" I am using my definition of resolution, not your definition.
Couldn't the reflections from walls impact not only the frequency response, but also impact phase and timing. That all would increase resolution and clarity at the listening chair.Ron, do you observe resolution or clarity changing with toe-in? I do not doubt that the presentation at the listening seat changes as speaker orientation changes, but I’m trying to understand how the resolution of the speakers would change with orientation. Are you sure you are not just hearing a different interaction with the room giving you the perception of increase or decrease in clarity? I think of resolution as something different and dependent on other factors in the system.
When I write: "with toe-in resolution increases" I am using my definition of resolution, not your definition. But I think you have a good point. I probably should've referred to information and detail rather than to resolution.
With toe-in the midrange/tweeter ribbon driver is aimed more directly at the listener. Perhaps this means the listener hears more information, more detail (rather than an increase in resolution).
Couldn't the reflections from walls impact not only the frequency response, but also impact phase and timing. That all would increase resolution and clarity at the listening chair.
I didn’t realize we had different definitions of resolution.
I think I see resolution more as an objective attribute than as a subjective attribute like naturalness.