The speed of this Denon is pretty good too. The high is all there but unlike silver . I like its tonal balance. The only down side is the depth of back stage as you said but it is just a different type of presentation.
Sorry. It is 3012R thread. I will stop posting cable now.
Well, Tango, it's silly to say anything against your beautiful system; its a mature, graceful sound that you have created. And although I am only listening now through these LS/35As, I posit that with the Denons iit may be more than a presentation issue. Yes, many times when a sound is different, particularly in ddk's reference to an increased "natural' perspective (which I will talk about if anyone is interested...I published a few things on it many years ago), one needs a period of time to 're-orientate" to what one is hearing.
And yet, there are limits in saying this. For instance, if you put on the "Gladiator" soundtrack (yes, I know, an audio trope amongst many here...but I'm a romantic idealist, in the strict philosophic sense, and love ancient Roman history, and so its an audio regression experience for me...) and listen to the far back kodo-like drums...well, they should ripple through space to you like thunder., accentuating the battle. The Denons barely know they are there. This is an omission. And one that diminishes the experiential gestalt of the piece; its panoramic intent; your deepening exepience of it. And that type of omission is never positive, mid-venue energy or not.
As I said, I'm torn about it. If it was only about that jazz trio in a 1920s Paris club, it would be no contest; the Denon excels. And although at the pearly gates I might opt for that Paris club forever, for now, the issue remains.
As I said, not sure...have to think about it more, listen more, of course. But...