Rachmaninoff: Prelude Op. 3 No. 2 in C sharp minor
Orch. by Stokowski
Hi Kal, with all due respect, I cannot agree with your conclusion. Via my sound system, it sounded awesome and the soundstage is huge! And I am not alone in my opinion. Classics Today, review by David Hurwitz, gave it the highest rating: No.10 for sound quality! MusicWeb International says: "These new performances are extremely well played and are presented in sound which is clear, rich and full. There is just the right amount of space around the orchestra so that quiet playing registers beautifully while the climaxes expand naturally."It is pretty nice but state of the art? Not by me. This is a re-issue of a 2001 Philips release.
He was less enthusiastic about the original CD release and, despite the 10, had one cavil of the new one. It is a lovely performance with really good sound but I find his Channel releases superior sonically. IMHO, not state-of-the-art or, at least, not still.Hi Kal, with all due respect, I cannot agree with your conclusion. Via my sound system, it sounded awesome and the soundstage is huge! And I am not alone in my opinion. Classics Today, review by David Hurwitz, gave it the highest rating: No.10 for sound quality! MusicWeb International says: "These new performances are extremely well played and are presented in sound which is clear, rich and full. There is just the right amount of space around the orchestra so that quiet playing registers beautifully while the climaxes expand naturally."
He was less enthusiastic about the original CD release and, despite the 10, had one cavil of the new one. It is a lovely performance with really good sound but I find his Channel releases superior sonically. IMHO, not state-of-the-art or, at least, not still.
Perhaps but that is a much more debatable issue which opens more than one can of worms. Let's stick with the recordings.Hi Kal, point taken. However, many a time one needs a state-of-the-art sound system to reveal the hidden gems in a recording.