Wow, this table is the new KING. I had my hands all over it yesterday and it is a tour de technical force, or I should say "air" force. HP told me that he thinks it may be the best in the world. I had a private session with it and Bob Graham yesterday and to say I was impressed would be mild. The table is dead quite (HP says this is the number one attribute), the vacuum is dead silent, rapping the side of the table while the recording is playing is amazing... no noise through the system. None nadda nothin honey.
Please keep a drool cloth handy if you are lucky enough to see one. Two units will be at CES- in the Genesis and Lamm suites. If Harvey were alive he'd say bring a ginty.
View attachment 7058
Peter,
in Munich it had plastic parts, so they might have changed it - good!
A very good concept for a belt driven table like the Micros or the TechDas is trying eliminating or balancing the vector force which comes to existance by a motor drawing on one side. Therefore a design allowing to use a second motor on the right side is a technological step forward. Micro Seiki used to do this by a flywheel concept with the H 80. As I know the designer of the TechDas has some roots from the fomer Micro Seiki company in Japan. Maybe you can ask him what he thinks regarding this topic.
I'm looking forward to hearing this puppy in your room, Gary!
The possible place for plastic parts would be the motor-housing cover, but when I picked the cover up the first time, it was made of aluminum. May be the one in Munich was a prototype. I know that parts of the design changed even between the first time I heard it in August and the production batch in Oct.
It sounds good in concept, but it might be impossible with the current state of the art to perfect. The two motors would have to run at EXACTLY the same speed, with motor-drive spindles EXACTLY the same size, and the belts would have to be identical. Otherwise, the two motors would be fighting against each other. If one runs consistently slower than the other, the belt on that motor would HAVE to slip. You could hear this sounding like a squeaky wheel when the slippage is gross. You end up trading one problem for another.
The Air Force ONE address this vector force unbalancing the platter to one side by putting as little "pull" as possible on the platter. To do this, they have a fiber belt that does not stretch. The belt is covered with a high-friction polymer so that even with relatively little force, it is capable of spinning the extremely heavy platter. In addition, the drive motor starts up in high torque to get the platter going, and then when stable speed is reached, it automatically goes down into very low torque mode just to keep the platter at speed.
The weight of the platter and carefully designed moment of inertia takes care of stylus drag so that the music has the dynamics of high-torque direct drive turntables. The main platter weighs 19kg (41.8lbs) and has most of its weight concentrated on the outside. Due to gyroscopic action of the heavy spinning platter, the vector differential problem is actually less than if you think of static objects. But that is only if the belt is above the center of gravity of the platter, and above the bearing.
View attachment 7085
It's here!!! I get to play with it for a couple of days before we have to pack it up to ship to Las Vegas.
Ship it to Vegas?
I wouldn't let those clowns touch anything I have. Everytime I sent something to Vegas, it would arrive in the room in pieces, duck taped together. That's why I drive every year.
How long did set up take from crates to platform, excluding the arm mounting Gary?
Okay so assuming it comes with a Graham mount it would take about as long. Hmmmmmm. I use Phantom L wands so I'd just need to specify a board for the L version?
How's the space underneath for connecting the requisite DINs? Will I need to recruit a munchkin?![]()
How would you rate the quality of the owner's manual?
I'm asking questions that are showing my growing temptation aren't I? Oh Lord. When does it end!