Your first sentence does not make sense, Blizzard. We have been discussing it here for the majority of these 401 posts. And I think your last sentence is an incorrect assumption. You are doing market research, so here are a few data points: I know what I own is not the holy grail. I have heard better and I am not bothered by that. Same for my buddies in our Boston Area audio group.
So does that mean you no longer want to publish video results of these tests, or that you agree that it might be difficult to actually have such a myth busting event take place? You accused Mike L. of copping out, but he publicly invited you over to his place and suggested that you bring your own digital gear. That sounds like an invitation and I have a feeling that Mike would write about the experience in a fair and specific way. He has clearly demonstrated his willingness to audition new things and to share his listening room with others.
Regardless, MadFloyd just had a small gathering of two at his place to compare his NADAC to his analog. I have spoken with them both and they seemed to have fun and learn a few things. I hope to go in the next few weeks with Al M. We will have fun because we each are approaching the comparison with an open mind and a willingness to learn about the latest digital gear. Al M. is actually in the market to upgrade his digital front end, and if this combination approaches what he and I heard at Goodwins with the Vivaldi stack in terms of musical involvement and enjoyment and resemblance to live instruments, than, we will have a great time and have learned something new about digital. The Vivaldi, though very expensive, did challenge my views about all of the previous digital that I have heard. It was excellent. And, Al and I will certainly be willing to share our observations with the forum on MadFloyd's system page.
If this myth busting event takes place in Seattle, I encourage you to share the results. Members don't have to read them, but those who are interested may learn something.