Hello Mike, my acceptance of the challenge is to not accept any excuses as to why it couldn't be performed. If there is a challenge presented, we can figure out a way to make it happen. I won't give any excuses as to why I couldn't do it, nor should the other party.....even if you aren't there to oversee said challenge.
Just line it up, set up the parameters, qualifications and all angles to debunk either way prior to the test and I am game.
Blind, double blind or whatever else the parameters call for, I am game. My ears have not lied to me yet. While I do not look forward to being proven otherwise, I am up to said challenge regardless of the results. I trust my ears.
Tom
So already we have an excuse as to why it can't happen. Not a good excuse Mike. Have a representative. Have two or three. Have 4 or 5. I do not care.
What I do care about is excuses as to why this can not be performed. I have accepted said challenge. Make it happen.
Come to my house, I will officially and publicly invite you. Perform your challenge here with as many witnesses you can provide. I have some local folks that can confirm anything here as well, regardless of the results.
Tom
Hmmm. I see that you won't accept said challenge unless you are present. This has been documented (just look 3 posts up).
Now you refer to your first post on the thread. Okay, fine. No problem. I will accept the lie above if you will accept the fact that I will not accept any excuse as to why the acceptance of your challenge can not happen. Local or otherwise. Just make it happen. I trust my ears. Do you trust your test(s)?
Tom
Bob, I love's ya' bro' but the poetic acid trip talk has got to be condensed into something that normal folks can understand.This is Mike's thread, he started it...look @ the first post. It mentioned group "therapy" (reunion) for testing audio equipment, comparing, blind testing, hi-res audio music flies, etc.
We are asked to come up with an audio myth and Mike is prepared to debunk it with witnesses present in real life.
People like me who live on the Island, that would represent a roughly 12 hours trip one way (ferry, cars, etc.). ...For others living in the Seattle area, and for me too, taking the plane would be faster and probably cheaper too. And renting a room @ the nearest hotel, or motel.
It requires true dedication. It is not a given. But the intention is solid, valid, pure and beneficial I am totally convinced.
Busting an audio myth is no simple challenge; it's a real-life down-to-earth experiment and objective/subjective analysis/evaluation, a scientific set of concrete proofs to arrive @ an evidence(s)/confirmation of the closet possible to absolute truth (busting the myth for real good; spanking the bug with a spatula, with blood underneath meaning real death)...not a mickey mouse thing from Mars.
You or the forum names the audio debunking challenge. I am game to whatever it is that you present. You do remember that this is "The official audio myth busting thread", right? You created it so I would assume that you do. With that said....Not sure of what the lie is? I was clear from the beginning that the challenge was to be preformed with the challenger present. I trust my ears just fine, but only my ears if it's my challenge. I'm still confused to what the challenge even is?
Bob, I love's ya' bro' but the poetic acid trip talk has got to be condensed into something that normal folks can understand.
Can you provide the Cliff notes on your latest post please? Thank you sir.
Tom
You or the forum names the audio debunking challenge. I am game to whatever it is that you present. You do remember that this is "The official audio myth busting thread", right? You created it so I would assume that you do. With that said....
Forget the lie. Do you personally need to be present for a debunk or not?
Simple question.
Tom
I am game to whatever challenge he presents for an audio "myth buster". Let the forum decide or let Mike decide. I am game regardless. How many times do I need to state this?Sure Tom; find your audio myth first. <snip>
Okay Bob, that I can understand sir. Thanks for clarifying.
My question is this. Mike presented the challenge. I accepted with the condition that there be no excuses. Now answer me this...it's his challenge right? Why should I be the one to fork out money for HIS experiment?
If the forum would pay for my trip up there, that's one thing but why should I bow down to his demands? He made the challenge, I accepted. He can have as many reps as he wants to come to my house to see if the challenge is properly done. There are many WBF members near me that can attest and record said challenge. I trust my ears.
I said no excuses as to why this challenge can not be performed and her it is less than an hour or so and we have many. Hmmmm. Let's give it 24 hours and see why else this challenge can not happen once accepted.
Tom
Hmmm, okay Mike. So your challenge is much like Randi's challenge. Everybody else spends their dime to prove or unprove your point. We all know that this forum is an experiment for you, so I will not fall game to this.If it's my challenge then yes I will need to be there to see everything is preformed properly. But I haven't presented any challenge yet. And nobody has as far as I've read.
But I can imagine we will never find any vinyl and tube guys presenting challenges vs digital and SS. This is because they would be too afraid to lose
Hmmm, okay Mike. So your challenge is much like Randi's challenge. Everybody else spends their dime to prove or unprove your point. We all know that this forum is an experiment for you, so I will not fall game to this.
FACT - I accepted your challenge.
FACT - I accepted no excuses as to why this challenge could not happen.
FACT - I will accept any challenge the forum or any member thereof challenges me to.
FACT - The excuses have changed since the acceptance of said challenge. My question is how many more excuses/changes must occur before challenge happens.
FACT - I love both vinyl, tubes and digital.
FACT - once again, I will accept any challenge presented, I will accept the video, I will accept witnesses, I have no excuses. All I am getting is excuses though.
Explain why this isn't a fair challenge to me again?
Tom