Sorry I missed this. Yes, from ProStudioMasters.Joe, is this a commercially available transfer?
Sorry I missed this. Yes, from ProStudioMasters.Joe, is this a commercially available transfer?
The Summary
We have praised its virtues in many a thread, but after some 6 months of ownership, I felt it deserved its own thread.
Initial thoughts were posted under Al M's system thread https://whatsbestforum.com/threads/my-monitor-subwoofer-system.25101/page-18#post-623618 with his own unit in my system, and I am just going to paste a couple of things that described it best:
Me: So far, the Yggy2 fed through AES/EBU and this Spectral SDR-3000SL transport offers the cleanest, most resolving redbook sound I have heard to date [in here, and that includes the dCS Vivaldi 2.0, the Spectral SDR-4000SV player and the MSB Premier+outboard PS & stock clock; I don't do tube DACs]
Harley: "It’s a spectacular performer on an absolute level, and an out-of-this world bargain. The Yggy is not just a tremendous value in today’s DACs, it’s one of the greatest bargains in the history of high-end audio."
I have determined that the Yggy2's RCA outputs are a little colored, partly due to its summation circuit, so I run it XLR-to-RCA, and always AES/EBU in. In addition, as wonderful and super dynamic as it sounds with that connection (for a claimed max 4V output), it does cause the preamp to distort at loud crescendos, so I have to engage the preamp's -6dB filter for that input.
The Yggy2 (v2.01 analog board) via AES/EBU and as connected is a new benchmark for me in here. Let me explain:
1) it has enabled me to fine-tune my speakers' crossover, to a point that analog sounds best as is as well
2) it has pushed me to fix that Pass XP-25 phono preamp, and I can now use its 76dB gain plus 47K "loading" for additional dynamic headroom, with simultaneous very low noise at loud levels and very life-like timbre and articulation; other changes were also necessary
3) it has enabled me to voice my modded Berkeley Alpha DAC even further to a point that it actually surpasses the Yggy2 with HDCD material
Let me start with #3; here's how I recently summarized the two DACs on HDCD (the Yggy does not decode HDCD, the Alpha does):
a) The Alpha outshines the Yggy2 with HDCD in terms of dynamic headroom and harmonic structure (at least with strings); the difference in macro-dynamics is really staggeringb) It does so - especially the macro-dynamics - even with its output volume slightly less than the Yggy's (51.5; output voltages are equal at 52.5)c) By virtue of their analog section designs, the Yggy's bass is rounder and more well defined, with all material (HDCD or not)d) The HDCD encoding is responsible for raising the Alpha's performance and dumbing down the Yggy's, and in addition, the HDCD process does affect timbre. One of the HDCD algorithms is to compress and expand dynamicse) The Alpha's superiority with HDCD (excepting the bass) is evident despite the SPDIF input and the "lesser" Shunyata Venom RCA interconnects, which I think are a fascinating cable for some $400 on the street. I use the famed Illuminations D-60 SPDIF cableAlong the way and over the past few months, the Yggy2 with redbook guided me how to best voice the Alpha with HDCD, in terms of mods and output volume setting (51.5)
Among the DACs I've had in here, the modified Alpha, Yggy2 and MSB Premier stand out because they have an extremely similar sound character, which indicates truth to the recording. They are not euphonic, they are not lush, they are not fake, just limited in what they can do with the format. The Yggy2 and Premier stand out for their clean sound with redbook.
Regarding #2, and how it compares to my analog now, there is no mistaking that analog is still the higher resolution format over redbook (with or without HDCD). But it took a lot of analog tweaking to get that: from anti-skating, to the XP-25 mods, to a new turntable suspension, and cartridge isolation with Isodamp. All these have been described elsewhere on this site.
The Sound
As compared to the other DACs, excepting the 4000SV player, the Yggy2 excels at rendering complete notes which raises truth of timbre and articulation, thus realism. It does piano unlike anything else so far in here but the 4000SV - but the latter's presentation is still slightly euphonic (which for me kills its rendition of complete notes), though less so than their old SDR-2000 DAC and much less than the Vivaldi's. It is incredibly low in noise, which increases transparency, palpability, realism and separation of instruments. It does still require a very low-noise and -jitter digital source, despite the manufacturer's reclocking claims. No experience so far with the Unison USB.
Its bass matches that of the 4000SV in tightness, roundness and musicality, and leaves the Alpha far behind in that respect. It is really very well defined and refined, but perhaps not as deep as other DACs. With the right recordings, strings can be phenomenal, with real palpability - out of redbook. This DAC has LIFE.
I posted sonic impressions with certain music material under Al's thread, but one thing that stands out is the BSO/Shostakovich recordings on DG (of all!), which render a very good replica of Boston Symphony Hall's acoustics as experienced from near and above the orchestra (basically, Balcony 1, seats A1-3), very much where the microphones would be. Symphony #11's second movement is just Wow material.
Al himself does a better job at describing sonic attributes, and he's done a very good job at that over the years; so I defer to him, plus I am out of time... I hope he'll chime in.
At the end of the day, I can listen to this DAC all day, every day; and I am obviously keeping the Alpha for HDCD.
-ack
does schiit mean anything ( no disrespect) ; just wondering if there is a meaning to it...Yggdrasil as well?
Hi Tony. No, I have not yet done that yet. As soon as I get a streamer/transport identified and bought for the Yggy I will give it a comparison run through with the DS DAC and Bridge II I am running now.@Alpha121, have you had a chance to compare the Yggy to the DS DAC? If so I’d be interested in your thoughts on how they compare, and which DS FW was used for the comparison.
That is your choice and mine.Hello @Don C , I have the Yggdrasil and the “Mimby”, which is the modi multibit DAC (combo modi/mani3) I use in my office system, similar in sound to the Gumby.. The Modi MB has a smoother presentation, not As detailed nor as dynamic as the Yggdrasil. I find it enjoyable and very forgiving of what’s being sourced.. I play it through my headphones or my Pass amp/monitor speaker setup.
In my main system, I run the Yggdrasil which is more opened up, dynamic and more resolving.. More transparent and detailed without any smoothing. It’s never harsh or etched, but it will not mend a bad recording Or cover it up. Here again, I’m feeding a Pass amp which doesn’t hold back and I’m never fatigued or analytically overdosed by the sound.. Since I removed the Bel Canto Reference Link and upgraded to the unison USB interface, I‘m getting even more detail and a cleaner background that just adds to the Yggy‘s realism and musicality.. Pace, rhythm and dynamics are clearly better, rendering a more realistic soundstage and layering.. I even have some hard core vinyl friends who are now adding digital because of what they heard from the Yggdrasil setup.. I have a large CD collection and for years I could not listen to much of it, until the Yggdrasil.. Now I’m rediscovering ALL my music again and thanking Mike Moffat daily for his creation !! Redbook never sounded better, even better than some high res recordings. I’ve had many CD players and DACs along the way, the Yggdrasil makes Music !! I have no desire to go back to analog, it’s really that good.. IME.. hope this helps.. I’m not a professional reviewer, which is clearly evident from my scribble..
Good Morning Ron.. One of the attributes of the Yggdrasil that attracted me to try it was the fact they DON’T use off the shelf designed audio “chips”. They use medical/military grade hardware that is designed for precision timing and accuracy (think MRI vs 1 bit summing for music). It has 21 bit accuracy where many DACS actually have about 6 - 8 bit accuracy. This means it retains the original samples, performing a true interpolation. This in house proprietary digital filter gives you the best of both NOS (all original samples retained) and upsampling (easier filtering of out-of-band noise) designs. Created by Mike Moffat, Designer of Threshold, CAL players, etc.. I believe MM was the first to build a stand alone DAC for the industry..There are so many fans of the Yiggy that it definitely is on my list of high sound quality per dollar DACs to consider.
The Absolute Sound review said the ‘ bold insisiveness‘ of the Yiggy may not best to those that like a more ‘relaxed’ sound quality.
That is what I hear and prefer with Lp..
I agree with that and prefer the Gumby multibit 5 over the Yiggy, which I used for 6 months.
Good Morning Ron.. One of the attributes of the Yggdrasil that attracted me to try it was the fact they DON’T use off the shelf designed audio “chips”. They use medical/military grade hardware that is designed for precision timing and accuracy (think MRI vs 1 bit summing for music). It has 21 bit accuracy where many DACS actually have about 6 - 8 bit accuracy. This means it retains the original samples, performing a true interpolation. This in house proprietary digital filter gives you the best of both NOS (all original samples retained) and upsampling (easier filtering of out-of-band noise) designs. Created by Mike Moffat, Designer of Threshold, CAL players, etc.. I believe MM was the first to build a stand alone DAC for the industry..
I bought the Yggy originally for my headphone system, After trying it in my main system, I was floored by how Good it was And what I was missing.. I spent more on cables that made little difference.
If you do give it a try, one must be patient as it takes a few hundred hours to break in and sounds it’s best being on 24/7.
Many folks on here are into higher priced gear and have extreme high end equipment and might rightfully be overlooking less costly gear.. but this is one DAC that is truly worth a listen, regardless of cost..
I’m not associated with Schiit audio in any way, but I’m truly a fanboy when it comes to this DAC and the genius of its creator.
Good Morning !! Thanks for keeping me honest ! In an attempt to provide proper specs, I didn’t read far enough.. I ran into video specs.. I stand corrected !(As a side note, your comment about accuracy of 6 to 8 bits of other DACs is exaggerated.)
Good Morning Ron.. One of the attributes of the Yggdrasil that attracted me to try it was the fact they DON’T use off the shelf designed audio “chips”. They use medical/military grade hardware that is designed for precision timing and accuracy (think MRI vs 1 bit summing for music). It has 21 bit accuracy where many DACS actually have about 6 - 8 bit accuracy. This means it retains the original samples, performing a true interpolation. This in house proprietary digital filter gives you the best of both NOS (all original samples retained) and upsampling (easier filtering of out-of-band noise) designs. Created by Mike Moffat, Designer of Threshold, CAL players, etc.. I believe MM was the first to build a stand alone DAC for the industry..
I bought the Yggy originally for my headphone system, After trying it in my main system, I was floored by how Good it was And what I was missing.. I spent more on cables that made little difference.
If you do give it a try, one must be patient as it takes a few hundred hours to break in and sounds it’s best being on 24/7.
Many folks on here are into higher priced gear and have extreme high end equipment and might rightfully be overlooking less costly gear.. but this is one DAC that is truly worth a listen, regardless of cost..
I’m not associated with Schiit audio in any way, but I’m truly a fanboy when it comes to this DAC and the genius of its creator.