My NY system is set up this way too- subpanel with 60 amp breaker cut into the service before the main breaker panel. Dedicated 20 amp lines run from there to the listening room. Ground at the subpanel , per code, is shared with the rest of the main household system, though there is an additional ground rod that is connected to all that as well. This is still not isolated from the main household electrical system and noise from a light or appliance elsewhere in the house can affect the system.
My ideal is to have completely separate service feeding a separate building, similar, i think to what Mike L. has set up, and running the big Equi=Tech. (I have already been over the code issues with the electrical inspector in Austin and it is do-able, based on zoning where I want to live). In that case, I understand that it is OK to have a ground that is not shared with the house because it is entirely separate- like two separate houses on the same parcel of land.
As to the impedence issues with grounding, doesn't that hit right at the heart of the issue? Separate dedicated lines have different grounding potential; the way various components are internally grounded also comes into play. I'm sure there are white papers that address this. That's what that Ground Zero device attempts to address, albeit modestly, without all the noise elimination/overbuilt aspects of the Troy gear. And the impedance is adjustable for each of several 'paths' with exponential variations depending on the three way settings of three different switches for three separate paths and which equipment is hooked up to which path. i I suspect the Ground Zero website might provide some basic info on the impedence issue, Lloyd. (Did you get a name change too? That seems to be the current rage here.) I'm not suggesting that this device is a panacea, only that it was the basis for a lot of my hands-on experimentation with external star grounding.
I ain't a tech, so Don or somebody else could jump in here.
My ideal is to have completely separate service feeding a separate building, similar, i think to what Mike L. has set up, and running the big Equi=Tech. (I have already been over the code issues with the electrical inspector in Austin and it is do-able, based on zoning where I want to live). In that case, I understand that it is OK to have a ground that is not shared with the house because it is entirely separate- like two separate houses on the same parcel of land.
As to the impedence issues with grounding, doesn't that hit right at the heart of the issue? Separate dedicated lines have different grounding potential; the way various components are internally grounded also comes into play. I'm sure there are white papers that address this. That's what that Ground Zero device attempts to address, albeit modestly, without all the noise elimination/overbuilt aspects of the Troy gear. And the impedance is adjustable for each of several 'paths' with exponential variations depending on the three way settings of three different switches for three separate paths and which equipment is hooked up to which path. i I suspect the Ground Zero website might provide some basic info on the impedence issue, Lloyd. (Did you get a name change too? That seems to be the current rage here.) I'm not suggesting that this device is a panacea, only that it was the basis for a lot of my hands-on experimentation with external star grounding.
I ain't a tech, so Don or somebody else could jump in here.