He probably liked them. Especially if the equalizer allowed them to measure well.They were reviewed in Stereo Review September 1968 by Julian Virsch.
Bose 901. 8th
Bose was trying to get rid of the concept of a sweet spot. He was trying to convince consumers that they could have great presence and full spectrum as they lived their life. No need to hunker down and focus.i like them. In fact many critics did. Hirsch considered them a sort of tour de force. The problem is they could not compete against the great speakers of that era.
FWIW, Stereo Review and Mr. Hirsch were major factors in the rise of the “listeners,” like JGH and HP. Hirsch was a strong proponent of judging things by objective measurements. People could clearly hear differences. JGH postulated that “if it measures well but sounds bad, it has to be judged as bad.”They were reviewed in Stereo Review September 1968 by Julian Hirsch.
Bose 901. 8th
I heard this speaker when I was up in Seattle with ARC amps. They were quite amazing.Jamo release 2005 the R909 openbaffle speaker a revolution, later often copied construction. They build a little desktop version ds7 too with subwoofer.
Unfortunately, they needed stable amplifiers. At that time I only had small tube amplifiers and fullrange drivers. therefore completely forgot that it exists. I would like to hear it again today, it was a wonderful sound then definitely an endgame speaker.
View attachment 110942View attachment 110945
If I play Quad stack from 120 hz and up using active crossover mated with Rel 31 subwoofers, it may sound fantastic.View attachment 111240
Wow this Quad stack is available at Ebay.
I had longed for Quad for long time.
Shall I add this one to my collection?
Get good dipole subs and cross at 80hzView attachment 111240
Wow this Quad stack is available at Ebay.
I had longed for Quad for long time.
Shall I add this one to my collection?