I think a lot of us here are missing my simple point. The designer (Touraj) of this particular tonearm has set a price for it that he believes that the market will bear. Whether this is correct or not will be borne out in the result of how many he sells. Perhaps, at this price price point, selling just one item will suffice. Perhaps, he needs to sell x number before a sufficient profit is accrued. What is interesting is that somehow, Touraj believes or knows, that a price of $35K will result in at least enough sales to make this endeavor worthwhile for him. My point, again, is how does he arrive at this number....versus a number that is either much higher or much lower. Since it would appear on the face of it that the pricing of many high-end items is purely arbitrary, a $35K tonearm (even if it is the best sounding tonearm in the world...and for this price it had better be, IMO) is a conundrum. The conundrum relates to what is the maximum price a potential Buyer would pay for such a device, before ALL potential Buyer's shout 'enough is enough'. Therefore, my question to Touraj is: $35K...why not $350K or better still $3.5M or? BTW, this pricing question does apply to all manufacturer's of high-end gear...what will your market bear before you have simply "overpriced". Does your market research ( which I am assuming is in fact done...perhaps a VERY BIG assumption) correspond with your pricing strategy...inquiring minds etc, etc.![]()
+1
This thread is fun