Gentlemen, let's lose the topic of guns, please. Thank you.
Tom
Tom
France working laws are complicated and from what you write, they don't encourage certain classes to go to work.
It will be interesting to see if France will hold with those social benefits in the long run, or change them as the burden will beacome have on the local economic.
By wealth do you mean what I earn today, or am I generating enough savings so when I retire, I don't have to leave my home for a dump. I have enough for food, medical, transportation, travel etc. Enough to live comfortably for 30 years on my savings.. But the main point is that there is no correlation between wealth and happiness, at least on a countrywide basis. Some countries value their citizens’ happiness more than their GDP growth. I suspect Spain is one such country.
I am self-employed. When I pay myself a net salary of 1000€, I have to pay 650€ on top of that for health insurance, unemployment insurance, retirement benefits, and a variety of other "contributions"... Add to that corporate taxes and income taxes, you spend half of your workday paying for taxes in one form or another.
Employees only pay a fraction of those "social contributions" - the bulk is payed by employers. I pay both! Most employees have no idea about the full costs even though all these "contributions" are mentioned on pay slips.
Wealth = Net AssetsBy wealth do you mean what I earn today, or am I generating enough savings so when I retire, I don't have to leave my home for a dump. I have enough for food, medical, transportation, travel etc. Enough to live comfortably for 30 years on my savings.
Thats a definition. Im asking the social qustion. Are you achieving a higher level of independence to ensure security in your retirement. A place where your not reliant on others for food, housing, health and general happiness. Meeting the minimum standard places one on reliance from others that worked harder.Wealth = Net Assets
, I don't have to leave my home for a dump
I have no idea what the relevance of your question is but you are confusing “wealthy” with “wealth”.Thats a definition. Im asking the social qustion. Are you achieving a higher level of independence to ensure security in your retirement. A place where your not reliant on others for food, housing, health and general happiness. Meeting the minimum standard places one on reliance from others that worked harder.
A lot of Americans would agree with this.In general I believe that Spaniards think that Americans work way too hard and have a poor and unhappy and unhealthy work/life balance.
Some countries have developed different models, were saving up for your retirement is part of your taxes, the government is not taking care of you, you are just cashing in your own savings when you retire. Assisted living, medicine expenses are covered. You can of course save up additional for your retirement, but a comfortable old age is not at risk without it.By peoples answers to my question of wealth, it sounds like some feel its ok to never have enough wealth to be self sufficient. Some trust government to take care of them at a level that maintains "Happiness". The effort to achieve enough wealth to be self sufficient is not worth it. Just be happy you can only work 37.5 hours now, not 40 hours.
I ask as I feel a government that's cutting the working class pay in order to stifle their economy, so it does not outperform other local economies is limiting citizens ability to acquire wealth on many levels. Not just the direct loss of pay.
When I was in the field, most everyone wanted to work 48 to 56 hours to get the overtime and additional cash. Many used this to purchase rental homes to build assets in one's portfolio. Most all had stock investments. I don't know of anyone that was looking for part time work. We wanted to acquire Wealth so we would be self sufficient when we retire.
Maybe the USA is different. Our Social Security is about $25,000 a year. And that is taxed at about 20%. So I actually get $20,000. An apartment to rent if you want to stay in the neighborhood where you have lived your whole working life is about $18,000 a year. In short, government is not going to take care of you. So you work to have savings to support yourself in your old age.
If you have to go to an assisted living facility, its $5000 a month if you require no help. If your need assistance with say medicatons and possibly bathing, it goes up to $10,000 to $15,000 per month.
Just saying. We work hard because we have to. The option of aging out of the workforce and living in poverty is not appealing.
Some countries have developed different models, were saving up for your retirement is part of your taxes, the government is not taking care of you, you are just cashing in your own savings when you retire. Assisted living, medicine expenses are covered. You can of course save up additional for your retirement, but a comfortable old age is not at risk without it.![]()
Given current devisive, tribal tendencies, the long term health and sustainability of society as a whole.
It sure depends what country you are in, here in Denmark it is excellent, you get what you pay for i guessThat's the theory. Do you want to spend your last days (or years) in the hands of public health services? Having witnessed things first hand, I can't say I do.
![]() | Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Ron Resnick Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |