My Silvaweld phonostage uses these tubes...great sound!The phono is really good cascode input stage and cathode follower 40db gain
The really good tubes are expensive 12ay7/ 6072aView attachment 115367
My Silvaweld phonostage uses these tubes...great sound!The phono is really good cascode input stage and cathode follower 40db gain
The really good tubes are expensive 12ay7/ 6072aView attachment 115367
I can't play my Kaguras on the Alsyvox as they are on different flloors, but one of my favorite set ups is my Ongaku on the Botticelli X, which I do play often. It doesn't have the slam of the SS amps, but for me it is sublime. The Kaguras would be ideal with twice the power. Chris can do that easily as the Kaguras and the Alsyvox are in the same room, just on opposite ends of the room.yes and Kaguras should be played on the Alsyvox. Next time.
If I remember correctly it's a pretty similar circuit. silvaweld uses fet for mc stage and kondo uses sut. yes, the five star GE tubes are exceptional. use them in my modified silvaweld swc 450.My Silvaweld phonostage uses these tubes...great sound!
Yes, a fet for the MC gain. I think the Silvaweld uses actually a more sophisticated power supply as it is all fully tube rectified and regulated...I think the Kondo is unregulated. It might actually be the same tube circuit for the MM part.If I remember correctly it's a pretty similar circuit. silvaweld uses fet for mc stage and kondo uses sut. yes, the five star GE tubes are exceptional. use them in my modified silvaweld swc 450.
high resolution without getting on your nerves, very nice realistic colors. not too fat in the bass. The best 6072 i have.other brands westinghouse, HP and Beckmann are close to them.come from the same house General Electric.
I only know the M77 as a replica sounds very nice.Yes, a fet for the MC gain. I think the Silvaweld uses actually a more sophisticated power supply as it is all fully tube rectified and regulated...I think the Kondo is unregulated. It might actually be the same tube circuit for the MM part.
Mine are branded National but they are probably GE...
Tricky to find an RCA 211 let alone four.To my ears the RCA 211 valves sound in combination with the Kagura’s clearly better than the GE 211 tubes.
Bob, you really don't like new production 211s?Agree 100% but in a pinch the GE's are still a whole lot better than new 211's. I use the RCA's but have some GE's as back ups.
Bob, you really don't like new production 211s?
I'm seriously considering ANs or Elrog Mayers in a few years, because GEs will be so hard to find, let alone almost unobtanium RCAs.
Yeah, I will be buried with my Silvaweld SWH-650.I only know the M77 as a replica sounds very nice.
i am a big silvaweld fan, for me things i will never part with.
View attachment 115386View attachment 115387
Acousticsguru has the AN ones in his Line Magnetic AS125...ask him about them...he says they are really good.Bob, you really don't like new production 211s?
I'm seriously considering ANs or Elrog Mayers in a few years, because GEs will be so hard to find, let alone almost unobtanium RCAs.
Just means that Stephan @DasguteOhr will dig you up laterYeah, I will be buried with my Silvaweld SWH-650.
Or vice versa.Just means that Stephan will dig you up later
Of course, you don't actually put tubes on spkrs.haven’t heard those two myself but know someone who did those compares, he still favoured the old ones.
But hey on Zus it wouldn’t matter.
Good to get a non garbled response, unlike some others here.Acousticsguru has the AN ones in his Line Magnetic AS125...ask him about them...he says they are really good.
Yeah, I will be buried with my Silvaweld SWH-650.
I guess no one else hears the issues that I raised with the videos? This is what a great videos of classical music should sound like:
I do not know if there is much interest in getting into the weeds with close analysis of videos though.
I spent the time to compare the various videos and I found your comment about the issues you hear from Ked's videos pretty interesting. There is certainly a very different presentation/sound from Ked's Diesis videos and yours here. Spatial information, interplay between instruments is very different. Other differences too. Perhaps you could record the same music for a more direct comparison.
I do not know if there is much interest in getting into the weeds with close analysis of videos though.
I'm curious, what recording device are you using for your videos?I guess no one else hears the issues that I raised with the videos? This is what a great videos of classical music should sound like: