Almost negligible. I don't know if there's anything wrong with my ears, but I much prefer RBCDs to SACDs. That's why I've made a downpayment for a Meridian 808.3 just today! Wahooo!![]()
Almost negligible. I don't know if there's anything wrong with my ears, but I much prefer RBCDs to SACDs. That's why I've made a downpayment for a Meridian 808.3 just today! Wahooo!![]()
Congrats...i have heard the 808.2 and it is a great player. I feel sure the 808.3 will even better...please post your impressions vs other players! would be interesting to hear how you think it compares. thanks!
Did you listen to SACDs in players of equivalent quality? Although I am not attracted by SACDs because I can not find much I want to buy in this format, I found that the quality was fabulous in good recordings with the top players. As the Meridian does not play SACDs how can you be absolutely sure it is the digital format your are judging, not the implementation of the reader?
BTW, the 808.3 is really very good!
The Meridian 803.3 CD player; is that an expensible (expensive?) playback device?
What! 20 Gs! Are you nuts or what?!!
* You get a very nice car (on the used market) for that amount.
And in some countries a very nice house. ...Or a huge piece of land.
...; how to optimise the capability of completely standard parts, how to attach most things to each other "correctly" ...
Frank
Bob, you need your meds, as Tim is fond of saying ...Frank, doez "optimize" zpell with a 'z'?
Thiz I believe. :b
That Meridian 808.3 CD player's better sound real good or else ....
From that review:Here's a review by RH on the Meridian 808.2. It's the immediate model before the 808.3. Not everyone would subscribe to this kind of sound, but it ticks all the right boxes for me.
http://www.avguide.com/review/tas-194-meridian-8082-reference-signature-cd-player
Despite these advances, CD has been fundamentally limited, we assumed, by its too-low sampling rate (44.1kHz) and too-short word length (16 bits)—parameters dictated by the state of late-1970s technology. Moreover, the vast majority of CDs in our music libraries were created with sub-optimum conversion and mastering technology, imprinting our favorite music with hardness, glare, and flatness. I’ve held a secret fantasy of hitting the lottery and using the money to re-master some of my favorite music (none of which has commercial potential), just so that I and other fans could replace our poor-sounding CDs with the best that today’s mastering technology can deliver. As much as CD playback has improved, it’s still fundamentally limited by the format’s parameters, and our libraries are plagued by the distortions introduced by the brickwall filters in A/D converters.
Here's a review by RH on the Meridian 808.2. It's the immediate model before the 808.3. Not everyone would subscribe to this kind of sound, but it ticks all the right boxes for me.
http://www.avguide.com/review/tas-194-meridian-8082-reference-signature-cd-player
Hi JTein...here is another one by HifiCritic...Martin Collom's magainze which is my favorite. Very similar to the way audio journals were 20 years ago...no ads, very detailed, long articles, loads of reviews in a single issue. This review is for the 808.2 i believe.
http://www.hificritic.com/downloads/digital/HIFICRITIC_MeridianCDP808i.pdf
I wonder if you also find that going direct into the amp makes the big improvement that is noted in the review. (not using the built-in preamp for other products, but just going direct into amp and using the internal volume attenuator).
![]() | Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Ron Resnick Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |