At Munich the Magico M6 room was only a few feet away from the Alsyvox room.
In my opinion the gap in performance between the two was huge. I'd be really surprised if anyone felt differently. But this is hi-fi and I hear opinions from.people I find I cannot relate to in any way, shape or form!
In fact there were loads of Magico rooms at Munich and none got close.
It is kind of silly comparing very large 4-panel speakers which cost €275,000 ($308kUSD) to more practical sealed box speakers which cost $172kUSD, and under show conditions at that as Al noted.At Munich the Magico M6 room was only a few feet away from the Alsyvox room.
In my opinion the gap in performance between the two was huge. I'd be really surprised if anyone felt differently. But this is hi-fi and I hear opinions from.people I find I cannot relate to in any way, shape or form!
In fact there were loads of Magico rooms at Munich and none got close.
At Munich the Magico M6 room was only a few feet away from the Alsyvox room.
In my opinion the gap in performance between the two was huge. I'd be really surprised if anyone felt differently. But this is hi-fi and I hear opinions from.people I find I cannot relate to in any way, shape or form!
In fact there were loads of Magico rooms at Munich and none got close.
You and I and other planar aficionados have to adjust for the fact that we are planar aficionados — and not everybody else is. I would not be at all surprised if some people preferred the Magico M6 to the planar speaker.
It's fine if the people defending Magico like Al have sufficient exposure to planars. As far as I can see the planar people have sufficient exposure to Magicos.
That’s drawing a long bow. My take is there wouldn’t be any need to defend Magico, Wilson, YG et al if the title of this thread wasn’t so controversial..It's fine if the people defending Magico like Al have sufficient exposure to planars. As far as I can see the planar people have sufficient exposure to Magicos.
That’s drawing a long bow. My take is there wouldn’t be any need to defend Magico, Wilson, YG et al if the title of this thread wasn’t so controversial..
You and I and other planar aficionados have to adjust for the fact that we are planar aficionados — and not everybody else is. I would not be at all surprised if some people preferred the Magico M6 to the planar speaker.
I see where you're coming from, and agree. FWIW, I've owned several pairs of hybrid planar magnetic speakers, as well as heard Infinity IRS-V's, the big Maggies, Martin Logans and many other panel speakers. So whilst my point was to question why, according to the thread title, the loudspeaker company which is the subject of this thread is apparently superior to several other well established high end loudspeaker manufacturer's products, I have, If I wished to enter into planar vs Magico debate, sufficient ear time on both to proffer a general opinion on the matter.I agree, the title of this thread has long since been made fun off and funny references made to it in other parts of the forum. I was referring specifically to Ron's comment. Preference happens when people know both A and B and choose one. Many times on this forum preference means someone chooses one because of not knowing the other
Don't worry Ron, I will prefer a well set-up planar to an insufficiently or even badly set-up Magico anytime. I would not be surprised if all the Magicos in Munich sounded comparatively lousy.
But for me it's year on year and also at different shows.
Absolute Sounds did the M6 at Windsor here in the UK and the Wilson room, also theirs, was monumentally better. And it was a mid range Wilson with ARC.
For me the only thing that casts a shadow of doubt was a Magico M2 room at Munich 2019 that was OKish.
I almost made Ron's planar point but didn't, because I do think there are better box speakers around. A lot of better box speakers.
Try and take this as my objective opinion and not a personal attack on any one else's.
In this aspects, I'm clearly with youMy take is there wouldn’t be any need to defend Magico, Wilson, YG et al if the title of this thread wasn’t so controversial..
That’s drawing a long bow. My take is there wouldn’t be any need to defend Magico, Wilson, YG et al if the title of this thread wasn’t so controversial..
So what? Shows are shows are shows.
Does not surprise me. I have heard Wilson Yvettes slaughter super-expensive speakers elsewhere in the same show. Means nothing, except that the Yvettes must be pretty good speakers, given how they sounded. As I said, shows are shows. They will never be any more than that.
Who knows, OKish might have turned great under optimal conditions. I have heard Magicos at shows where, if you would have asked if I'd be even mildly interested in that sound, I would have said never in a million years. Heck, I've heard Magicos at dealers sound absolutely atrocious.
You have had your experiences, and I respect that. But respectfully, I have been around the block with Magicos a few more times, with countless exposures to the sound in friend's systems, with careful set-up. Hell, I remember vividly being highly disappointed with the Q3 upon first exposure -- until after some discussions about the sound my friend tweaked the position of these newly acquired speakers a bit more. Then the speakers suddenly began to sing. Don't expect such magical transformations to happen under show conditions.
Shows have excellent sounding rooms in many cases.
For that to be missed on countless Magico setups defies the law of reasonableness.
You liking them is fine by me BTW. It just appears that no matter what I don't.
Shows have excellent sounding rooms in many cases. For that to be missed on countless Magico setups defies the law of reasonableness. In many cases with excellent quality ancillaries.
If they really are that finicky then the chances of most enthusiasts getting it right is not going to be great.