Apple, Enjoying 'Prolific Year of Innovation' With iPhone, iPad, May Report Muted Ear

steve williams

Site Founder, Site Owner, Administrator
Connie Guglielmo, Forbes

Apple CEO Tim Cook earlier this week said it’s been a “truly prolific year of innovation” at the company, which has unveiled three new versions of the iPad, including the iPad mini, a slimmer, larger-screen iPhone, redesigned iPod media players, updated Mac notebooks and desktops, and new generations of its mobile and desktop operating systems.

But all that innovation comes at a price.

Customers, bombarded with mostly-accurate rumors about new products to come, held off buying current models as they waited for the next-great thing from Apple. And production constraints — Apple’s website still shows a three to four week wait for the iPhone 5 a month after the smartphone was released — is causing demand to outpace supply, which puts a damper on earnings.

At least that’s the story financial analysts are telling to explain why their estimates for Apple’s fiscal fourth-quarter results, to be reported today after the market closes, have been ratcheted down. And why Apple’s forecast for its first quarter, which covers the holiday shopping season ending in December, may fail to impress investors.

“Expectations have been reset,” said Shaw Wu, an analyst with Sterne Agee in San Francisco. “A lot of people are expecting a miss. The stock has corrected. Right now, the big question is not as much about demand, but did they build enough? It’s a high-class problem. A lot of companies build too many products and nobody wants to buy them. Apple has the opposite problem — they don’t build enough to meet demand.”

It’s that high-class problem and Apple’s potential to keep winning over customers, even with an iPad mini that at $329 is higher than the $199 rivals from Google and Amazon, that keeps Wu and other analysts optimistic about the company’s prospects.

“Almost every product from Apple has been criticized. And yet every one has gone on to sell way more than anyone thought,” Wu added. “At the end of the day, does it really matter what we say or the press says? No. At the end of the day, customers decide.”

The Numbers

For the three-months ended Sept. 29, Apple was expected, on average, to report sales of $36.2 billion and profit of $8.84 a share earlier this week. This morning, those estimates were at $36.02 billion and $8.81 a share.

Yes, that’s still up from last year, when the company had fourth-quarter sales of $28.3 billion and profit of $7.05 a share. And it’s also higher (as usual) than Apple’s fourth-quarter forecast of $34 billion and $7.65.

But many analysts lowered their estimates after Cook said Apple had sold its 100 millionth iPad as of about two weeks ago. Given that Apple had shipped 84.1 million iPads through June, Cook’s comment suggested Apple sold less than 16 million iPads in the fourth quarter — below the 17 to 18 million the Street was expecting.

It was also below his “conservative estimate” of 16.5 million iPads, Wu said. For that reason, Wu dropped his fourth-quarter sales estimate to $36.2 billion, from $36.6 billion, and earnings per share to $8.88 from $8.93.

iPhone shipments also took a hit in the quarter as customers held off buying as they waited for the iPhone 5. The new device went on sale Sept. 21 and Apple said it sold a record 5 million units in the opening weekend. But analysts says that week or so of sales is probably not enough to make up for the customer pause. They predict iPhone unit shipments will be below the 26 million iPhones Apple sold in the third quarter.

(For the record, the iPhone (at almost half of revenue) and iPad (at about a quarter of sales) together account for more than 70 percent of Apple’s sales. The Mac, meanwhile, brought in 14 percent of revenue last quarter. )

Ben Reitzes of Barclays Capital, says investors should also brace themselves for Apple to deliver a sales forecast below the $54.9 billion the Street is expecting for the holiday shopping season. He sees product shortages over the holidays of both the iPhone and iPad mini, which goes on sale in the U.S. on Nov. 2.

iPad mini

Reitzes expects Apple to report sales of $34.3 billion today, down from his prior estimate of $34.9 billion, and profit of $8.31 a share. But like Wu, he’s bullish on Apple’s prospects, in part because of Apple’s App store, which he calls a “key differentiating factor” for Apple’s mobile devices.

Cook this week said there are more than 700,000 apps on the App Store, including 250,000 specifically designed for the iPad. Users of Apple’s iOS mobile devices — the iPhone, iPad and iPod — have downloaded more than 35 million apps. Apple said it kept the pixel resolution the same on the iPad mini as on the regular 9.7-inch iPad, which means existing apps should run without any modifications on the mini’s 7.9-inch screen.

“This software strategy enables a distinctive ‘stickiness,’ which should enhance customer loyalty/retention over the long term as apps personalize devices to levels that competitive imitations cannot match,” Reitzes told investors in a note yesterday.

He’s also banking on the iPad mini to win over new buyers, and lift Apple’s sales next year. “The iPad mini is one of the best ways for Apple to expand the [total addressable market] for the iPad,” Retizes said. “Given Apple’s reputation for superior design, software, content delivery and overall brand the iPad seems like a market where its share could arguably be permanently higher than that of the iPhone’s.”

Gene Munster of Piper Jaffray, who has a $910 price target on the shares, says investors should look beyond today’s report, saying he expects the company to outperform in 2013 on continued demand for the iPhone and iPad mni. “While the September quarter and December guide may be disappointing compared to historical trends, we remain positive on Apple given that we expect a significant ramp in iPhone 5 sales as supply issues resolve,” Munster told investors in report today. “We continue to believe that Apple will launch a TV in mid-to-late 2013, which should be positive for investor psychology around Apple’s ability to innovate.”
 
Ironically, there has been very little innovation coming from Apple at all for a while. Incremental improvement and very smart productization and marketing of existing technology yes. Innovation no.
 
Ironically, there has been very little innovation coming from Apple at all for a while. Incremental improvement and very smart productization and marketing of existing technology yes. Innovation no.


You're starting to sound like KeithW :)
 
I noticed that the new iMac has no disk drive. Apple is taking an deliberate path here. OTOH, I'm not sure that having no disk drive is a plus. Certainly it contributes to the ability to make the screen thinner, BUT I really like the option to burn and copy discs.
A stand alone unit isn't that great an option IMO. Anyone else feel that this may be a misstep?
 
You're starting to sound like KeithW :)

I have a relative who works for Apple in Cupertino. He absolutely and fully admitted to me that Apple's new product cycle
is 90% driven by Wall St analysts who get nervous if the don't see "new" products from Apple every 9 or 12 months.

This has caused problems. The iPod Nano Touch was a bomb and was rushed to market to have something to announce.

The iPad 3 had an inferior WiFi receiver. My Google Nexus 7 recorded speeds 25% faster than my wife's Ipad3, at 1/3 the cost.
One of the major "upgrades' of the 4th gen iPad is a new WiFi receiver, which confirms it was previously inferior.

There has never been so much product churn with so little benefit.
 
I noticed that the new iMac has no disk drive. Apple is taking an deliberate path here. OTOH, I'm not sure that having no disk drive is a plus. Certainly it contributes to the ability to make the screen thinner, BUT I really like the option to burn and copy discs.
A stand alone unit isn't that great an option IMO. Anyone else feel that this may be a misstep?

I prefer disc drives to be included. I use external optical drives, too, but I like a 2nd drive.

On the other hand, the "super drive" in my Mac Mini is a piece of garbage. It stopped reading DVDs and spits out CDs for no
reason randomly.
 
I noticed that the new iMac has no disk drive. Apple is taking an deliberate path here. OTOH, I'm not sure that having no disk drive is a plus. Certainly it contributes to the ability to make the screen thinner, BUT I really like the option to burn and copy discs.
A stand alone unit isn't that great an option IMO. Anyone else feel that this may be a misstep?
I thought that was pure form over function. Even there, I am not sure anyone want to brag about a thin desktop computer that way. It is not like people wall hang them and such. Optical drivers are still useful to have and taking them out to make the device half as thin is not something I would like. Hanging an external drive to it would ruin any advantage it would bring form look point of view.
 
I noticed that the new iMac has no disk drive. Apple is taking an deliberate path here. OTOH, I'm not sure that having no disk drive is a plus. Certainly it contributes to the ability to make the screen thinner, BUT I really like the option to burn and copy discs.
A stand alone unit isn't that great an option IMO. Anyone else feel that this may be a misstep?

I do too, and I'm typing this on an iMac. I don't use my internal drive often (usually just to rip the occasional CD or install new software), but I'm glad it isn't relegated to being another box on my already cluttered desk. Aesthetics aside, I don't see the point of making a desktop machine as thin as possible and sacrificing the optical drive in the process. Laptops I understand, but not desktops. I just hope that Apple bump the spec of the external drive to be Blu-ray compatible (but I ain't holding my breath!)...
 
I purchased a new MacBook Pro with all solid state memory and no disc drive. I did purchase an external Mac USB drive for the 1 piece of software I have that is not (at the moment) downloadable. When I am not using it (which is 99.999999999% of the time), it is in a drawer, so requires no additional real estate.

Not a big deal either way for me . If I recall correctly, Apple was the first to move in the 3.5 inch disc from the 5 inch so the move to no included drive is not a surprise at all.

And as for the inferior WiFi ability of the iPad 3, I have not experienced any degradation. I get the exact same performance from it as I do my MacBook --- both of which run up to 95% of my direct connect speed (depending on time of day).
 
Don't know Keith, nor have I read his comments on Apple, but as per the adage "great minds think alike" he must be a pretty smart guy.

He is ;) Hahaha!!

Steve is an Apple share holder. How are those Apple shares going, Steve? I'm sure that you noticed that the announcement of the iPad Mini and a whole slew of new toys from Apple has failed to give AAPL much of a bounce?

Apple's defenders keep asserting that they are an innovative company. Well, I am struggling to find the innovation in the iPad Mini with a microscope. Where is it? :)
 
It's easy to see that Apple is following a predictable product announcement path, and it's been that way for years. iPod events every September, software and/or hardware Mac announcements at WWDC in July, etc...

There are strategic decisions that we don't know about, that are likely influencing these "one off" announcements, like the iPad 3 at the beginning of the year. Apple is very much worried about the competition, I'd say even more than in Steve's days, and that is translating into more and more rapid iterations of product, in order to keep up with what the competition is doing, but always in the confines of Apple's strict product matrix.

So, competition is good, and is making Apple do more things, faster. And apparently, they can do it. Unlike Microsot, as Amir pointed in a different thread.

At this rapid pace, not every single announcement or product can be revolutionary, most will be just bumps in speed and little improvements here and there, to keep up with the competition. But you can count on at least one major announcement per year, and one big revolutionary thing every couple of years or 3.


alexandre
 
I noticed that the new iMac has no disk drive. Apple is taking an deliberate path here. OTOH, I'm not sure that having no disk drive is a plus. Certainly it contributes to the ability to make the screen thinner, BUT I really like the option to burn and copy discs.
A stand alone unit isn't that great an option IMO. Anyone else feel that this may be a misstep?

The built in drive of my iMac is horrible when it comes to sound quality. It's probably for the best.
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu