Things are heating up at the Inid household! Glad Gary is feeling better. It is not fair Joe. One should not be allowed to experience heaven yet on this earth.![]()
+1 for Gary feeling better.
Thanks Jim,
Your turn will come
Things are heating up at the Inid household! Glad Gary is feeling better. It is not fair Joe. One should not be allowed to experience heaven yet on this earth.![]()
Gary,
As you have experience using the Steve McCormack interocitor with the Burmester 911 mk3 I will ask your advice about a small detail. I have a tube balanced preamplfier (ARC REF40) that needs 6 meters of cable between it and the amplifiers. As far as I understand, in order to use it in a optimal way with the Burmester 911 mk3 I need to use the interocitor, uisng a XLR cable at the output of Ref 40 and an RCA cable at the Burmester side. Should I use a long XLR and the shortest possible RCA cable?
Nice to know you are feeling better from your back.
+1 for Gary feeling better.
Thanks Jim,
Your turn will come![]()
Thanks, Micro.
I don't know if you would really need the Interocitor. The REF40 is pretty capable of driving 6m of balanced interconnect. Since the 911 is a balanced amplifier, I always prefer it using balanced inputs. Why would you want to use an RCA cable at the Burmester side?
If you absolutely have to do it, it is always better to use a long XLR and a short RCA.
Gary,
The only data I cab get about the input impedance of the 911 mk3 says: Burmester 911mk3 input impedance: 22.9kOhms Unbalanced, 1.88kOhms Balanced.
The XLR is surely not a good match for a tube preamplfier and I have found that the REF40 sounds (and measures) better in XLR than RCA.
-----How come you guys are talking so much about heaven here in this thread? :b
LG Life's Good!![]()
Documentation on the web about Burmester - even Owner's Manuals - are notoriously bad.... A recent example was one posted on this forum - that the 909 is 120W.
I would be surprised if the XLR input impedance balanced is really that low. I've driven the 911 with 7m XLR cables with absolutely no problems. What is the output impedance on the REF40?
Congratulations! IMHO, one of the signs of a truly great system is the ability to listen at low levels with all the joy and excitement of listening louder. Give the amps plenty of time to run in - I find that the 911's (and the 909's) improve slowly, and then there is a giant step up at about the 1,000 hour mark (YMMV depending on your music and listening level). With an industrial facility, I can run them loud at nights without any complaints![]()
(...) One of the risks of this hobby is back injury due carrying all these heavy amps around. Just be more careful in future. I've had my fair share of back problems due to moving amps around. (...)
Because it's a Burmester thread, duh!
Ha!
Hi.
Burmester components are very sensitive to the cables used. If you would like to maintain the extreme pure home-sounds you have not so much choices. I tested a lof of cable's manufacture and I found very good at that price the Burmester Silver or if your goal is "no compromise" and "money no object" I highly reccomend the Nordost Top (Valhalla or Odin). Personal reference choice.
Having used the 911 as a reference amplifier now for over three years with about 100 different pairs of speakers, I can't say I agree with the silver cable choice. As always, I'd suggest a demo in your speakers with your system, but I prefer Cardas Clear or Shunyata cable to the silver cables. For what this stuff costs, make sure and get a demo to see if it's to your liking.
I've found the 911 to be relatively forgiving of different cable compared to a few other things I've tried, that's one of the reasons I like the amplifier so much.
Thanks Jeff,
I should have have my amps Tuesday night![]()
Gary, glad to know that you are well now.
On another note, I've read that running amps in mono mode doubles the wattage but halves the current delivery. Is it true? If that is so, wouldn't biamping be better (vertically or horizontally)?
Great news, Joe. Be prepared for sleepless nights!
Halves the current? Is this not counter productive? Current> watts?
That doesn't really make sense. The size of the power supply is not changing. You're pretty much taking a 350 watt per channel stereo amplifier
and converting it to a 700 watt single channel amplifier. That should not cut the current delivery in half.
Not my quote. I was asking if true or not.