Republicoftexas69
Well-Known Member
LOL That is not science just rubbish.If SVS is not enough for you, it's not my problemView attachment 113997
LOL That is not science just rubbish.If SVS is not enough for you, it's not my problemView attachment 113997
LOL That is not science just rubbish.
Instead of quoting theorems, I listen to music and have grown up attending hundreds of live symphonies.True. In an analogous manner, unfortunately those who claim that vinyl is better than digital do their own cause a grave disservice by regurgitating fatal misunderstandings of digital theory ("stairsteps", lack of basic understanding of the Shannon-Nyquist theorem etc).
Instead of quoting theorems, I listen to music and have grown up attending hundreds of live symphonies.
On a lower end or midrange system, digital probably does sound better than vinyl.
True. In an analogous manner, unfortunately those who claim that vinyl is better than digital do their own cause a grave disservice by regurgitating fatal misunderstandings of digital theory ("stairsteps", lack of basic understanding of the Shannon-Nyquist theorem etc).
Actually no, the statements about dynamic range for digital media are factually correct.
As you stated @peraljam5000 point is moot and why are we wasting our time??Actually no, the statements about dynamic range for digital media are factually correct. And as far as I can tell, a dynamic range of 70 dB for vinyl is a quite generally accepted number.
A better answer might be, does it matter? If the dynamic range of most *recordings* isn't that high, which appears to be the case, what's the point?
Also has anyone compared DSD and other hi res files / streaming to vinyl?
It blows away Vinyl so hard it's not even funny .
Actually DSD is the closest to the sound that was recorded in the studio , he can hear no difference to at all
Paul from PS Audio says it himself .
And vinyl "has a sound of it's own " That's a direct quote from him .
Not to mention that vinyl is a copy from the digital master .
Nothing can sound better than the master itself, period .
Lol no amount of facts will change your mind
Also has anyone compared DSD and other hi res files / streaming to vinyl?
It blows away Vinyl so hard it's not even funny .
Actually DSD is the closest to the sound that was recorded in the studio , he can hear no difference to at all
Paul from PS Audio says it himself .
And vinyl "has a sound of it's own " That's a direct quote from him .
Not to mention that vinyl is a copy from the digital master .
Nothing can sound better than the master itself, period .
Enjoy your "superior " format
You can stick with what these sheep have to say, but you will never assimilate us!
As you stated @peraljam5000 point is moot and why are we wasting our time??
Just a note to the discussion--often people are talking about streaming versus playing vinyl. If you are playing purchased high-res digital files the comparison changes a bit.
Get together, drink plenty and play music… what’s not to get enthusiastic about tho I do prefer my jazz without the wordsScandinavian Jazz bands are great, what they lack in talent, they make up for with enthusiasm ! And sometimes having only a rudimentary knowledge of English does not hold them back from singing whole albums in said language !
Interesting that you should say that.I would agree that digital cannot sound as good as vinyl.
Until my Horizon and tube rolling came along.
I am in heaven.
Now I don't stand up every 15 minutes to flip a record, clean, destatic, find albums, etc.
Call me lazy
Instead of quoting theorems, I listen to music and have grown up attending hundreds of live symphonies.
On a lower end or midrange system, digital probably does sound better than vinyl.
(...) You have your opinion, I have mine. The fact that your opinion may be louder ("vinyl blows digital away", per a previous post of yours) does not automatically make it more correct.